Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Simonetti
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 18:35, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Lauren Simonetti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No real coverage in outside sources. The two sources cited are her bio from the company (not outside) and a wedding announcement. Nothing I can find describes her as notable independent from her role as a reporter. Ducknish (talk) 21:18, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A close call perhaps, but I'd lean towards saying she's notable. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • AAPT) 01:54, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - Reporters are tough as far as notability goes, because most coverage is written by them, not about them. Consequently, it is difficult to establish notability per WP:GNG. I still think Wikipedia should have a notability guideline for reporters, but as it stands, I don't believe Simonetti passes the general notability guideline. Go Phightins! 02:04, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteShe has literally no third party independent coverage. Considering http://www.silive.com/weddings/ the wedding announcement doesn't count. Ryan Vesey 07:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.