Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesuit Centre for Faith and Justice, Dublin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jesuit Centre for Faith and Justice, Dublin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fail WP:GNG, promo. The Banner talk 10:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, very poor evidence of notability. I looked for independent secondary sources and found only 3 at all likely ones out of the 18 (!), two of which are 404 not found — not sure what to do with those — and the third an article in The Irish Sun which was basically an interview with a representative of JFCJ. Pretty dubious as an independent source. If by some quirk it's kept, the section "Projects" (=about 85% of the article) certainly needs removing. Bishonen | talk 11:51, 11 February 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland -related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 12:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations -related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 12:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No independent reliable sources found and article's tone is questionable. GN-z11 ^☎ ^★ 16:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Jzsj (talk) 14:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Making sentences out of routine and trivial mentions does not transubstantiate the source material into significant coverage. The article subject lacks significant coverage in multiple independent sources, and does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH. Bakazaka (talk) 21:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I find it hard to believe that a ministry with 6 staff manages to be WP-notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:24, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note. I just placed a request for this discussion to be close here. Thank you all! ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 21:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MattLongCT, that isn't necessary, as admins sweep through AfD regularly. Bakazaka (talk) 23:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.