Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Vanke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Vanke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unelected political candidate who has not received significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (politicians) Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (yak) @ 14:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (gossip) @ 14:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (post) @ 14:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails notability thresholds. Manzzoku (talk) 14:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Doesn't meet the notability criteria for politicians since running for office doesn't show notability and lacks the coverage needed to meet WP:GNG. Jakejr (talk) 18:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.