Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heraldic Authority of Southern California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. CSD G5 (User:JWJustinianotheGreat) Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:03, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heraldic Authority of Southern California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification. Fails WP:NCORP 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:16, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and California. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:16, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This likely has COI/self-promo issues, and could even be a hoax. All the same, it fails every flavour of notability. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:23, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – no sign of notability. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gigachad5000. --bonadea contributions talk 19:38, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable promo KylieTastic (talk) 19:56, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:A7 at the very least, and possibly WP:A11, as this looks like something the author made up in school one day. --Finngall ^talk 20:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.