- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 18:49, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Heso magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable magazine - mostly the topic on Wikipedia of repeated spam by Brettathus (talk · contribs). All the article states is "the magazine exists and writes about a bunch of stuff". It does nothing to assert notability. Biker Biker (talk) 22:50, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence found (Google, Highbeam, Questia) to establish notability. Happy to change my view if suitable Japanese references are identified though. AllyD (talk) 22:32, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No third-party sourcing or coverage, so no indication of notability. --DAJF (talk) 02:28, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as completely lacking in depth coverage in independent third party sources. If such sources get added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:49, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.