Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Colombia, Ankara
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 17:25, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Embassy of Colombia, Ankara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:ORG. embassies are not inherently notable. they need significant coverage of its activities LibStar (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move toColombia-Turkey relations and broaden scope. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:39, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- the article doesn't exist. LibStar (talk) 19:56, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Which is why it is a redlink. We can add http://www.mfa.gov.tr/relations-between-turkey-and-colombia.en.mfa http://www.ntn24.com/news/news/turkey-and-colombia-scrap-visa-requirements etc. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:43, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Then Keep In ictu oculi (talk) 02:17, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Which is why it is a redlink. We can add http://www.mfa.gov.tr/relations-between-turkey-and-colombia.en.mfa http://www.ntn24.com/news/news/turkey-and-colombia-scrap-visa-requirements etc. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:43, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
1st source you provide s a primary source. LibStar (talk) 09:46, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 01:53, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 09:47, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:ORG. Edison (talk) 15:33, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:ORG, embassies are not notable unless they cover significant relations (like Embassy of the United States, London) or were involved in a significant historical event (like Embassy of the United States, Tehran) Revolution1221 (talk) 16:18, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.