Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dried nasal mucus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mucus. (glad I already had my lunch). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dried nasal mucus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We don't need this article. We have the articles on mucus and eating mucus and this article basically just copies them. This should be deleted and redirected to mucus. Marsbar8 (talk) 19:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to the mucus article. Is WP:EWW a thing? Oaktree b (talk) 19:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  No, it's called WP:NOTCENSORED. If this is redirected somewhere, a better target is nasal mucosa, but none of the relevant articles mention the topic of this article directly, so I'm not sure if a redirect is ideal. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to mucus or nasal mucosa Earth2022 (talk) 23:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.