- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:52, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Castle Trust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Absolutely no notability. Candidate for a speedy delete in my opinion. 95.150.248.199 (talk) 23:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- note This nomination was not processed correctly. I have no opinion as to its merits. Mangoe (talk) 23:49, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:25, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:25, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JodyB talk 05:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete unless the article is expanded to show that the subject is significnat. It appears to be seeking to raise money to lend on equity-sharing mortgages, a form of finance that has not been popular historically; requiring a large deposit, where borrowers will probably be able to raise finance anyway. It may have some success with over-priced London houses, but I do not see its role elsewhere. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.