Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anisha Ambrose (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Courcelles 06:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anisha Ambrose

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR, as an actor with only one released role. May be likely to qualify eventually. (Should userfy to either original poster or current active editor.) Nat Gertler (talk) 03:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and possibly usery for now. I endorsed a PROD last month and it's pretty much the same. One released role with more in production and the news articles are mostly for that, new to the industry and never thought of being an actress until being noticed. No prejudice towards a future article. SwisterTwister talk 03:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. czar ♔ 03:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. czar ♔ 03:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 20:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep her second film Areyrey is releasing where is the heroine or main actress and this is verifiable.Prefer Keep to Userfy here.However no prejudice to usefy strictly speaking she fails WP:NACTOR marginally for now. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:21, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources and notable projects. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.