Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Pocketful Of Sunshine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Shaiju Mathew. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:07, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Pocketful Of Sunshine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an upcoming book. Fails WP:BKCRIT and WP:CRYSTAL. - Mr X 13:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Shaiju Mathew. I can't find anything to show that this book passes notability guidelines. For that matter, the author's article is looking a little suspect as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the coverage is on his debut book's article, so I'm thinking I'll merge all of the book info from both articles into his and redirect. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:45, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still thinking the author's page is of dubious notability. He's received a little coverage over his first book, but not very much. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:16, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. I'd support keeping the author article. -- GreenC 06:57, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - As nominator, I support redirect based on the reasons articulated above. - Mr X 11:59, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.