Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mulshi Pattern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 22:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mulshi Pattern (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM. Wikipedia is not IMdB. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM Spiderone 15:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as have found five full reviews with at least three in national publications; Times of India here, Zee 5 here, Pune 365 here, Marathi News here, and Marharaash Times here. With this significant coverage in reliable sources WP:GNG and WP:NFILM are passed in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – Meets WP:NFSOURCES / WP:GNG, in part per the reviews provided above. My WP:BEFORE searches reveal that more usable coverage exists as well, such as [1], [2], [3], etc. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:03, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the reviews listed above. — Toughpigs (talk) 20:23, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The mentioned article can be relatively notable, and may be better to keep it rather than deleting it, although adding more references can support it more! Ali Ahwazi (talk) 05:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above improvements Donaldd23 (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.