Troydevinny545

Hello, Troydevinny545, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lego James Bond, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Rorshacma (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lego James Bond, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rorshacma (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shag (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shag (film) was changed by Troydevinny545 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954565 on 2014-04-07T02:54:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Home on the Range (2004 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 15:26, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 34th Golden Raspberry Awards may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• home a single prize. That film has the most golden raspberry nominations without a single win (beating the tied [[Cannonball Run 2]] and [[I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry]]''.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to List of films with a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes does not have an edit summary. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page.

The edit summary appears in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! SummerPhD (talk) 15:31, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to The Birdcage, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 15:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Not Without My Daughter, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 20:36, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Not Without My Daughter, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 17:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please block kelapstick now.

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to T-Force (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhD (talk) 00:57, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Frankie and Johnny (1966 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 01:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2nd Golden Raspberry Awards. You need to cite a reliable source for the specific claim you are adding. You did not present a source. The claim is unsourced. SummerPhD (talk) 23:41, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

You do not seem to understand that you need to cite sources, not just state in an edit summary that you have them. Please read WP:CITE and discuss the issue on the articles' talk pages before restoring the unsourced material. You are about to be blocked from editing again. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:16, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

You seem to be having trouble figuring out Wikipedia's core policies. In order for your edits to remain (and you to not get blocked), you will need to follow them.

To make things a bit easier, I would strongly encourage you to consider our adopt-a-user program. If you sign up, you will be paired with a more experienced editor who will help you find your way around and avoid some of the problems you've been having.

The choice is yours to make. - SummerPhD (talk) 23:52, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

When/if you return from your block, please consider the adopt-a-user program I've suggested. In any case, you will need to discuss the issues on the articles' talk pages. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:22, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Troydevinny545 (talk) 00:43, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

PLEASE PLEASE BLOCK Monty845 RIGHT AWAY!Troydevinny545 (talk) 01:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Listen to Me. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fuck you, SummerPhD, Universally Means That a Film received a 0%-6% Rating on Rotten Tomatoes, Widely Panned Means That a film received a 7%-20% rating. DO NOT REMOVE THIS! YOU NEED TO RETIRE FROM WIKIPEDIA! Troydevinny545 (talk) 17:04, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Additionally, I would point out that, should you achieve an unblock, your petulant and unsubstantiated requests to have admins blocked will not in the long term prove helpful to you. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:23, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

You are Even Worse then SummerPhD. Fuck You, Anthony Bradbury. Also, Another Message to SummerPhD: Fuck you Too. Troydevinny545 (talk) 19:41, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please Block Both SummerPhD and Anthony Bradbury Right Away!Troydevinny545 (talk) 19:45, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

• I've revoked your ability to edit your talk page, you were warned by Anthony Bradbury, and continued abusing your talk page access. Any additional appeals will need to be made through the Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System. Your block duration is now 1 month. Monty₈₄₅ 19:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Troydevinny545, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SummerPhD (talk) 17:40, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Troydevinny545, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SummerPhD (talk) 22:38, 2 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

As a blocked editor, you are not allowed to edit Wikipedia until your block expires or is lifted. All of your edits have been reverted and the clock on your one month block has been restarted. Further sock puppetry will result in your block being extended, eventually leading to an indefinite site ban. - SummerPhD (talk) 13:03, 3 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Also, as a blocked user, you are not allowed to request a new account via the request an account tool. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 01:04, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Following the appearance of Troydevinny545backup2 (talk · contribs), I have made your block indefinite. Favonian (talk) 15:50, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Meow indeed.

Iowamutt (talk) 07:08, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have modified your block to allow talk page access, solely so you can request a block review. Any request must note that you've engaged in block evasion as recently as this week, as 184.4.120.8 (talk · contribs), and should (but does not have to) include a note that you've been warned for inappropriate edits made there, even aside from your violations of WP:BLOCK. I suggest you are not eligible for unblock consideration at this time and your best hope is WP:SO, but I'll let you make your case here. To the reviewing admin, note that I am not the blocking admin and don't have any particular insight into what lead to the original block, here. --Yamla (talk) 19:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I strongly suggest replacing the talk-page block once the unblock request has been made; I lifted it solely so this user could make a single request. --Yamla (talk) 19:44, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

{unblock | reason=Sorry that I was vandalizing Wikipedia a few years ago and I won't do it ever ever again}

This doesn't address your inappropriate editors nor your continued violations of WP:BLOCK. I told you that your unblock request had to address these. I'll give you a few minutes to specifically answer these concerns in your unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 20:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

You aren't retired. That's deliberately misleading. You are blocked. As you haven't bothered writing a sensible unblock request and as you are just wasting our time, I have once again revoked talk page access. This leaves you with WP:UTRS. I strongly suggest you'll need to wait at least six months (with zero edits, whether or not you are signed in) before making a request via UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 20:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply