Ruy costa

Hello, Ruy costa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to St Patrick's College may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:01, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Patrick Feehan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• //archive.org/stream/lifeofpatrickaug00kirk#page/24/mode/2up The Life of Patrick Augstine Feehan]] Rev. Cornelius James Kirkfleet OP, Open Library, Matre & Company Ltd., Chicago, 1922.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to William Abraham (bishop) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• A Compendious History of the United Dioceses]] by Patrick Power, M.R.I.A., D.Litt., UCC.</ref>.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Vincent P. Martin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 00:56, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on New Beginning (Advisory Group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 05:24, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Remember, always, that Wikipedia is not here to promote your cause, however noble you perceive it to be. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:52, 7 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Liberties, Dublin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ], [[Digital Skills Academy]]<ref>[http://digitalbiscuit.ie/?page_id=468 Digital Skills Academy]] Digital Biscuit.</ref>, [[Iveagh Market]] (currently awaiting redevelopment), Vicar Street music

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richmond Barracks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Collins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Richmond Barracks may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• stationed at Richmond Barracks. In 1907, it became a sub depot for the Royal Irish Constabulary]]<ref>[http://www.politicalworld.org/showthread.php?14480-Richmond-Barracks-Inchicore Richmond

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:22, 17 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Santry may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Catholic parish and served by the Church of the Holy Child, and by Blessed Margaret Ball, Church (named after one of the Dublin Martyrs. The Church of Ireland community are served by St. Pappin's

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:International Federation of Catholic Universities, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 22:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irish wine, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mallow and Lusk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas Joseph Power, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlow College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Brady (Bishop of Boston) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• bc.edu/cgi-bin/bostonsh?a=d&d=BOSTONSH19100115-01.2.7 The Sacred Heart Review], Volume 43, Number 4], 15 January 1910 </ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Brady (Bishop of Boston), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diocese of Boston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walter Blake Kirwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Louvain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Preston (Alderman), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ballyroan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Walter Ball (Alderman)

added links pointing to Robert Ball and Edward Ball

List of Lord Mayors of Dublin

added a link pointing to Walter Ball

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newman College Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cork. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 19 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Synod of Maynooth(1975) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jinkinson talk to me 17:33, 6 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shane O'Donoghue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane O'Donoghue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NickGibson3900 ^{Talk Sign my Guestbook Contributions} 10:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Patrick's College, Maynooth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlow College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newman College Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ballykelly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ALONE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ALONE until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Olden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WIT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Michael Olden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG: Unable to identify any demonstrably independent and reliable sources offering significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^T 18:40, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Olden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Olden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —swpb^T 17:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating Joseph Brendan Whelan, Ruy costa!

Wikipedia editor TonyBallioni just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hey, thank you for contributing articles about Catholic clerics. I really appreciate it. I've come across several and noticed they aren't formatted like most biographies. You might want to read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies for help!

To reply, leave a comment on TonyBallioni's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi again. Just wanted to echo my above sentiments: both about how grateful I am that you are creating articles about Irish Catholic clerics, and how it would be useful to conform them with Wikipedia's manual of style. I can catch them on New Page Patrol, but as evidenced by some of the other deletion nominations here, others might not get that most of the articles you create are about notable clerics. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Ruy costa, thanks for creating Walter McDonald (professor)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs references providing substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 16:26, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gay and Lesbian Equality Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HSE. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Please have a read of WP:CITE and the linked guides - you should be putting references in a proper format, not just including a bare reference. Thanks in advance. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 21:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Thomas Flynn (Columban priest) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTMEMORIAL, nothing to suggest that passes WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 15:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Peter Fallon (Columban Priest) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NORMEMORIAL. No credible assertion of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 15:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Owen McPolin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen McPolin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 15:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Fallon (Columban Priest) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Fallon (Columban Priest) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Flynn (Columban priest) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Flynn (Columban priest) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:11, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to John Heneghan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:35, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Maurice Kearney has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A local parish priest who happened to deal in cattle and used the money for the parish is not notable enough to pass WP:BIO. The source are a personal website, a local website, a mention of the fund set up in his honour and an offline book. No WP:RS here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ww2censor (talk) 10:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Patrick Thomas Brennan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to notability outlined in the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 14:37, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Aedan McGrath has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to notability established in the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 14:43, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Ciarán Ó Coigligh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established in article. (College he is president of appears to be a completely private one, i.e., a business.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:00, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Rory Hearne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established, does not appear to meet either WP:ACADEMIC or WP:POLITICIAN

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:05, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aedan McGrath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aedan McGrath until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Scope creep. Ruy costa, thanks for creating Fachtna O’Driscoll!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add an image of the person. Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

scope_creep (talk) 23:17, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Scope creep. Ruy costa, thanks for creating James Moynagh!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add an image

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

scope_creep (talk) 16:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating Cornelius Tierney, Ruy costa!

Wikipedia editor Scope creep just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

How about an image.

To reply, leave a comment on Scope creep's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

scope_creep (talk) 15:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Dave Cullen (Computing Forever) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:BIO. The sources provided do not discuss him significantly, and I cannot find such sources through a Google search for "Dave Cullen" "computing forever" (fewer than 100 results, just mentions on web sites and blogs).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 19:58, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nuala McGovern, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drumcondra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave Cullen (Computing Forever) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Cullen (Computing Forever) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 19:48, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Ruy costa, since you edited the article, do you know of Dermot Whelan is in this image. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:10, 26 September 2019 (UTC) Ruy costa (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2019 (UTC)I think that is a different dermot whelan.Reply

 

The article Rowan Croft (Grand Torino) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable subject, fails to meet notability guidelines, largely unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rowan Croft (Grand Torino) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rowan Croft (Grand Torino) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 20:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've no idea if the person you've named in two separate articles now is or isn't the person in the video who actually throws a milkshake over the builder and former British soldier, but I can't find any verifiable or reliable sources that name the alleged assailant, nor can I find any reliable sources saying there was anything other than a milkshake in the cup. The Liberal is most certainly not a reliable source. I think those edits might actually need oversight. I also definitely think you needs to properly source your edits, per WP:V and WP:RS. Discussing here to hopefully avoid having to bring to AN/I. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Donie O'Sullivan (reporter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not seeing independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources either in those cited in the article, or elsewhere online.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edwardx (talk) 10:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 09:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ruy costa. If you restore the disputed material again at Rowan Croft (Grand Torino) you will be risking a block under the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Restoring deleted content policy. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:31, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sir Thomas Esmonde, 9th Baronet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Esmonde (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Theophilus O'Flanagan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 09:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Ruy costa,

Thank you for creating William Coppinger (bishop).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Large chunks of prose remain unsourced. Even if they are reused sources, there should be sources after almost every sentence of the page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 03:09, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The article William Henry Krause has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of encyclopedic notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Richard William Beaty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looking like as not notable as per the references provided

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pokaiᗙ Happy New Year! 17:54, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Ruy costa,

Thank you for creating Mike Garde.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Mike Garde, but it currently accomplishes little more than a repeat of his resume/CV. Consider finding more robust coverage of his activities and reactions to them. This is the type of information that helps with notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Irish College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capranica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Ruy costa

Thank you for creating Matt Treacy.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start!. I'm marking as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:56, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Liam Swords, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 01:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Ruy costa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Theophilus O'Flanagan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Desmond Clarke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UCC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Galway Business School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable and promotional

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 08:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your edit. However you have added "SSC" without any explanation of what it means. And you added information about work in Nebraska without a citation. Could you please resolve these. Thanks Kerry (talk) 22:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hallo, Thank you for creating John Norton (bishop) . When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie John Norton ), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. .

Please also remember to include birth and death dates in the lead sentence. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 04:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Patrick Devine, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 01:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ruy. I'm aware English may not be your native language, but just to be aware, ordinary nouns are not normally capitalised in English. So, peat briquette and communications manager, not Peat Briquette and Communications Manager. The names of religious denominations, however, are capitalised, so Protestant not protestant. Regards, Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 20:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Similarly, Quaker is always capitalised. While I'm here - any chance you can learn how to cite references properly? It really isn't hard. WP:BAREURLS are to be avoided. Also note that references go after sentences, not just randomly in the middle of sentences. Cheers. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Are you just deliberately trolling me now? I mean, I've mentioned this to you several times now, and a certain level of comptence is required. Seriously - will you use the Preview function (it's right beside the Save button and under the Edit Summary field - which you should be using)? Proper capitals when they're needed, none when they're not, proper citations (using the template) rather than bare URLs, references after punctuation - c'mon, these are basics. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Galway Anti-Racism Network, is not suitable as written to remain published. This is because it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources that will demonstrate the article's notability (see: WP:ORG and WP:GNG). (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. If you need more help, you can click this link to ask a question, or just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks. Seagull123 Φ 15:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

One could almost be forgiven for thinking the article was created solely in order to include the anti abortion commentary, as they are pro choice; and to attack the left-wing election candidate mentioned. Those "controversies" would obviously be removed if the article returns to mainspace: one is oddly lacking the response from the organisation, which refutes the allegations; the other is a complaint about an individual, which apparently did not result in prosecution or conviction, and the individual is no longer involved with the organisation. WP:COATRACK, WP:DUE and WP:NPOV all come to mind. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 19:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colombia Three, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael McDowell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Ruy costa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patrick Devine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Ambrose Wellesley Leet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NBIO as a non-notable clergyman. A BEFORE search finds nothing but trivial coverage in directories and genealogies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:43, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Derek John Christopher Byrne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Most of the sources seem to be from the Catholic church and do not prove notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aerin17 (talk) 01:51, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Ruy costa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Liam Swords, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Ruy costa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Galway Anti-Racism Network, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St Patrick's College, Maynooth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archdiocese of Armagh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Once again, can you use proper citations. It. Really. Isn't. That. Hard. cite web| url=thewebaddress.com| title=The Article Title| publisher=Some website or book or journal| date=date of publication| access-date=the date you add it. That's it. Just wrapped in ref tags and the template curly brackets. If you don't, well, WP:LINKROT is much harder to fix.

Gript has been ruled to not be a reliable source. It will be removed if you use it. Edit summaries are a thing - whether using this account, or your logged out and using the IPv6 2A00 addresses. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:36, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, The Open College, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JBchrch talk 16:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adam Averell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mullan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Could you make one, Ruy? To learn how to add references properly? It's not hard!!! cite web| url=thewebaddress.com| title=The Article Title| publisher=Some website or book or journal| date=date of publication| access-date=the date you add it. That's it. Just wrapped in ref tags and the template curly brackets. If you don't, well, WP:LINKROT is much harder to fix. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 23:34, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Dublin by Lamplight has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, not properly referenced, bare URLs, random punctuation, etc. "Dublin by Lamplight" was not the name of laundry and female penitentiary. The editor's NPOV characterisation of who used laundries is unreferenced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 23:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Ó Fiaich Institute of Further Education, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

• Could you make one, Ruy? To learn how to add references properly? It's not hard!!! And I'm fed up fixing them for you because you appear to be too lazy to do them properly. cite web| url=thewebaddress.com - if a book, not a link to Google Books | title=The Article Title| publisher=Some website or book or journal| date=date of publication| access-date=the date you add it. That's it. Just wrapped in ref tags and the template curly brackets. If you don't, well, WP:LINKROT is much harder to fix.

• References go after punctuation, not in the middle of sentences.

• 'Protestant' takes a capital, just like Catholic does.

Happy New Year! Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 21:10, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add: Just to note, this is the kind of work you make for other editors when you don't bother properly citing something and just stick in a bare URL. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

So your answer is a big fat 'no', then - just two fingers to fellow editors? Right, so noted. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Digital Skills Global has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Defunct private training company - of questionable notability anyway, with a poorly-written article. I see no reason to invest time to improve and retain.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SeoR (talk) 08:25, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Ruy costa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Open College, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Ruy costa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Open College".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christian Leadership in Education Office (CLEO), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cork.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Ruy costa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ó Fiaich Institute of Further Education, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Irish Rosary, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 19:32, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on James Creedon (Journalist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Osarius 14:38, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Ruy costa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ó Fiaich Institute of Further Education".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

A biography you recently created about a living person, Declan Marmion, is not suitable as written to remain published. To avoid possible deletion it needs more citations from reliable, especially independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:49, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St. Saviour’s Priory, Dublin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Studium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:49, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ruy costa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Damien Brennan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 11:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Ruy costa,

I saw your comment at Talk:Damien Brennan but the comment was made after the article was already deleted so the deleting administrator didn't see it. You might consider contacting them if you are interested in having the article restored and moved to Draft or User space. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article James Creedon (Journalist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ruy costa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Thomas Raymond Hyland for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 00:13, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ruy costa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Richard Alphonsus Sheehan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 00:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Thomas Keane (Christian Brother), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 08:24, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for contributing to the article Four Courts. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 08:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Denis Coffey (physician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:37, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I've had to move this to drafts because of insufficient referencing. Two sources, each only once cited, is not enough to support the article. While this person may be inherently notable per WP:NACADEMIC on account of the UCD presidency, that claim needs to be substantiated with references. Also, three of the four paragraphs are entirely unsupported by citations, which begs the obvious question — where is the information coming from? Please add more sources and cites before republishing. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Francois Anglade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established for either GNG or Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Secondarily, article is poorly written - e.g., random and/or absent capitalisation, tortuous, unclear sentences.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:12, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article André Darré has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established for either GNG or Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Secondarily, article is poorly written - e.g., random and/or absent capitalisation, tortuous, unclear sentences.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:12, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Louis-Gilles Delahogue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established for either GNG or Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Secondarily, article is poorly written - e.g., random and/or absent capitalisation, tortuous, unclear sentences.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:13, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Pierre-Justin Delort has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established for either GNG or Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Secondarily, article is poorly written - e.g., random and/or absent capitalisation, tortuous, unclear sentences.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:15, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louis-Gilles Delahogue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis-Gilles Delahogue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:03, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francois Anglade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francois Anglade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:05, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article André Darré is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/André Darré until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:06, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pierre-Justin Delort is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre-Justin Delort until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:06, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St Flannan's College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bishop of Ross.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Jill Kerby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:33, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Matt Treacy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable and largely unreferenced. Publications are self-published.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:15, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Ruy costa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thomas Keane (Christian Brother), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for contributing to the article Adelaide Hospital (Dublin). However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 17:48, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I think you may be wasting your metaphorical breath, Dormskirk - this user knows our WP:V and WP:RS policies by now, and knows where WP:CITE is - they just refuse to bother trying. See multiple requests above. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 18:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Ruy costa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thomas Keane".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:23, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Dardistown Cemetery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Woodtown Cemetery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gript is not a reliable source. Please stop trying to shoe-horn it in to articles. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 13:29, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Like, if it's something such as dyslexia that results in you capitalising words that shouldn't be capitalised, and omitting capitals where they are required, I could understand it. Maybe include a note to that effect on your userpage if that's the case? But please use the 'Preview' function before you hit 'Publish'. You'd catch lots of basic errors that way, surely, such as run-on sentences, incorrect tenses, "seen" instead of "saw", etc. It would also really help if you'd use the proper citation templates instead of referencing things with bare URLs. Have some consideration with other editors, and readers who are visually impaired and need to use screen readers? Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please engage? I don't want to have to revert your additions, but I don't see why I (or others) should have to patrol all your edits to fix mistakes. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Phair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conwal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear Ruy Costa, I wanted to thank you for your attention to a number of Irish biographies, some of which are on my watchlist. It is interesting for me to talk to you as you are a Wikipedian quite similar to myself with regard to edit count and interest in Irish biographies. You added the category [[Category:Burials at St Michan's Church, Dublin]] to 14 Irish biographies. You seem to have a reference about burials at St Michan. Can you please share it with me, if this is easy to do? I checked some of these biographies and in some cases the text seems to contradict the category or make it unlikely. The article Charles Hamilton, 5th Earl of Abercorn, says he died in Strabane (Lodge 1789), which makes a burial in St Michan, Dublin, a bit unlikely. The article Callaghan MacCarty, 3rd Earl of Clancarty, says he was buried in Christ Church Cathedral, Dublin (DIB). The article Christopher Plunket, 2nd Earl of Fingall, says he was buried in St Catherine (DIB). The article Justin McCarthy, Viscount Mountcashel, says he died in France. The article Thomas Butler, Viscount Thurles, says he drowned at sea. It might be that some are mistaken identities and that people of that name were indeed buried at St Michans but they are not the subjects of these articles, they just have the same names. Some of these first names and surnames are quite common in Ireland. However, I might be wrong. Contradictions between sources are also not seldom. One would have to check the dates and titles given in your source against those in the articles and then carefully correct or extend the articles. With many thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 10:38, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I will check, the Hamilton vault is in st michans, maybe it was a different charles earl, there is lots of re-internments into family vaults, and memoriums added, and when other churches closed and were de-consecrated. I will go through them and remove those where there is doubt Ruy costa (talk) 11:16, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

There is also sometimes confusion with burials in St. Michans; since there is St. Michan's Catholic Church, Dublin which we know really as Halston Street church, the the likes of Bishop John Linegar is buried in St. Michans catholic church - is sometimes incorrectly registered as being in the Church of ireland one. Thanks again for your advice Ruy costa (talk) 11:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Ruy costa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dardistown Cemetery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Ruy costa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Woodtown Cemetery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Where do you get your information from? I ask because, in a recent series of edits to St Catherine's Church, Dublin (Church of Ireland), you didn't add a single inline reference. Nor did you use any edit summaries. You are not a new user, so I don't need to highlight WP:VER and WP:BURDEN, but can you please explain/support your edits as expected. Otherwise they are indistinguishable from made-up/hoax material and any other editor could quite reasonably simply remove any of that content (as unsupported). Guliolopez (talk) 20:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Ruy costa,

Thank you for creating Irish Dominican College, Louvain.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I've reviewed this article, and it looks like a good start, however, more inline citations may be required in order to verify information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|IceBergYYC}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

IceBergYYC (talk) 07:29, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Like IceBergYYC, I have also reviewed the article. It contains your usual ungrammatical errors such as Camel Case, not capitalising words that should be capitalised, capitalising words that shouldn't be capitalised, and tortuous run-on sentences. And this is after someone else has already taken a decent copy-editing pass over the article! Once again, you've not bothered using proper citation templates, instead just including bare URLs, which will lead to link-rot and make things harder for other editors to fix. Also, an almost complete lack of edit summaries. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 09:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

You created the article, but you don't say exactly where the Friary (monastery) was, the article lacks the location of what you have written. You wrote "on a site granted by Ulrick Burke, Earl of Clanricarde," I've changed that to Ulick Burke, 1st Marquess of Clanricarde, and what site??? The article the way I see it is very poor, can you please go back to it and fix it up better, thank you. Govvy (talk) 11:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Independent Party (Ireland) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Independent Party (Ireland) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iveagh Gardens (talk) 17:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, can you tell me the meaning of your edit It has also hosted Tiaze meetings and services.? Regards Denisarona (talk) 16:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Denisarona, the editor in question, unfortunately, does not seem to bother with proof-reading, spell-checking, using Any Sort of Capitalisation system The manual of Style would recognise, using the cite template, or engaging with anyone else on talk pages. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 13:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nemeton TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemeton TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:00, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sure, I'll appeal to your better nature again. Can you please use proper citation styles and templates when adding references? It's really not hard, and prevents link rot. All that's needed is the information you already add, with a small bit of formatting! Like this:
<ref name="optional">{{cite web | url= |title= |last= |first= |publisher= |date= |access-date= }}</ref> That's it! You can even omit author's last and first names! Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 13:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Church of Ireland Historical Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Ireland Historical Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Historical societies based in the Ireland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply