Ritchie333

How do edits work? --Wikiwimmy (talk) 22:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

I just realized you haven't made any edits since July 15. I hope all is well. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:57, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Ritchie333 same; I hope all is well. Roads4117 (talk) 20:06, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm snowed under in real life with things, also being doing stuff like this and I can't think of any articles to write about at the moment, and that's always been the motivation to come here. I think once I fully recharged my batteries, I'll be back. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Fret ye not, Threesie. If this place gets too much for you, don't forget, you can just Beat it! Martinevans123 (talk) 14:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

No worries at this end, Ritchie, but I just wanted to check. Real life is more important than this place. Glad to hear back from you. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hey mate,

I was wondering if I could write biographies about influential people who have made contributions to any company, city, country, or anythings that important? If so, what should I keep in mind to ensure the biographies are respectful and accurate, and avoid any potential issues? --SummoneRise123 (talk) 20:50, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The essential reference is the biographies of living people which explains that we must write about living people and their activities conservatively, using very high-quality source material. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi How can I edit and send my picture So that people will know me well in the network --Sani kaita (S k) (talk) 10:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'd strongly advise you not to - this isn't LinkedIn, but an encyclopedia writing project. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello I would like to create a Wikipedia page about my father who is all over google reserve but don’t have one Wikipedia page I would like to share his experiences his path troughs his studies and challenges . Accomplishments for the country and the integrity he want people to adopt. How do I make a simple page of his bibliography? --UserAfrica05 (talk) 19:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The best advice I can give is to avoid writing anything you have any personal connection with. This essay shows some of the pitfalls you can encounter; particularly, once a Wikipedia article is created, and is deemed to be notable so it should stay, it is very difficult to remove the information. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I got you assigned as my mentor. You seem like a cool person. I hope you're open to questions if/when I have them :) --Bro The Man (talk) 06:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) Yeah, don't worry, Bro. He's deffo too cool for skool. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Ritchie333. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

—asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 16:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

All sorted, with an indef block thrown in too. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is not a merger consensus. Please reconsider the close. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, several "keep" arguments were directly refuted, as were some "delete" views, so the "merge" option suggested by some seemed to be the option that I felt most people who expressed a view could live with. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 20:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

To deletion review it is then. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The only other possible closure is "no consensus" in my view. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion review is the unwanted bonus for admins who close AFD discussions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose (As EEng translates, "Wait for coins to drop, then make your selection") Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello Ritchie333:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) & Alanna the Brave (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

hello, if an editor engages in competitive disruptive editing of an article, what steps can be taken? --Nohorizonss (talk) 20:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The basic guidelines are set out in this page. The first thing to do is start a discussion on the article's talk page, and see if a consensus can be reached. If it can't, then further things can be tried such as getting a third opinion or filing a formal notice for dispute resolution. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 07:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ritchie Thanks for being my mentor! One of the things I would like to do is sort out the "roguelike chronology" page tables. Primarily because the table for traditional roguelikes has become polluted with Japanese rpg listings. Most aren't "pure" or traditional roguelikes (ASCII graphics, etc.) and don't belong there. Many don't qualify as hybrids. So my thought would be to move them into their own category table. BUT I wanted to ask you for advice whether I should or not, and if it is worth doing. It will require research on my part--which I have no problem with at all. I'm happy to do it, but I require your advice first. Thanks! --Wigandbean (talk) 01:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm afraid I don't know what "roguelike chronology" is - my focus has generally been on British architecture and transport articles. As for a general piece of advice about whether you should do something or not; the general view is you should have a go at doing it on one article, and if you get reverted on that, start a discussion and see what happens. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi!

Thanks for responding.

I understand. And I'll give it a go.

I'll make some notes and plan it on paper first. I'll need to do some research too. But I was looking for a "project" in general so I think this will do.  ; )

Best,

RC Wigandbean (talk) 23:33, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have set up an account to add a page. I am using my son's laptop that uses the same Wifi as mine, but when I log into my laptop, an error message appears saying the IP address is blocked. How can I unblock my laptop please?

Thank you --Omar Azami (talk) 15:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply