Princepratap1234

Ayesha Singh is currently playing a major role in Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin. She also played an important role in a TV Show Zindagi Abhi Baaki Hai Mere Ghost and also did a major role in a movie Adrishya. Kindly requesting to please stop the deletion process. Fierce lady (talk) 05:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Fierce lady,

Please stop badgering other editors. Assume good faith. This editor has the right to nominate an article for deletion if they believe it doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:41, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Respected Princepratap1234 , Ayesha Singh is playing the lead role of SAI JOSHI in Star Plus Most Popular TV Show Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin . Apart from this show , Ayesha Singh has played the lead role of Amy D'Costa in Zindagi Abhi Baaki Hai Mere Ghost . She has debuted in the year 2015 and played a pivotal cameo role in Zee TV Popular Show Doli Armaano Ki as Ratti Sinha . She is the Female Lead in her Bollywood Debut Adrishya . She is TOP-5 TV Personality by FMN and Ormax Rating as well . I have mentioned three major roles apart from the current show Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin . So , I request to take back your vote given for deleting this page . Here's the appreciation article : [1] 49.206.48.15 (talk) 05:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

You've removed some information from the lead section of the following summary with the edit summary 'unsourced'. The informations are not unsourced. The infobox has a link to the show in hotstar. I've replaced a source which indicates the production. So, I request you not to revert them. Thank you. Shinnosuke15, 18:07, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

thanks for reverting my edits on Anupamaa related to Aneri's character. As I was also going to do the same. Because I wasn't able to find out the citations related to same that she has started shooting from yesterday. Though I saw it on post by sbs. But the citations were not provided. Pri2000 (talk) 20:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Can a draft be proposed for deletion? I tried adding the template using {{subst:Proposed deletion}} but I guess that's only for articles. Are there any templates for deletion of drafts apart from MfD? ManaliJain (talk) 06:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

ManaliJain, use this one {{subst:Proposed draft deletion}} and read Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of drafts.Princepratap1234 (talk) 07:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I went through this page but this template isn't working. ManaliJain (talk) 08:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

ManaliJain , use this one {{Db-g7}}.Princepratap1234 (talk) 09:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Alright, thank you! ManaliJain (talk) 10:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tell me one thing, is it okay to directly create an article for a film instead of a draft? Like yes, it's been done by many but are there any chances of the article to get deleted for any reason if being created directly as it's a stub? I want you to have a look on Draft:Tiku Weds Sheru and tell me should I give it for a review and wait or should I create an article directly with the details and sources I have. It's already been replicated once by an editor and I don't want that to happen again. Please give me your genuine opinion on this. ManaliJain (talk) 12:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

ManaliJain, it's not mandatory to create draft ,you can directly create article in mainspace if it's notable. For creating articles on future films, see WP:NFF and WP:FUTFILMS.Princepratap1234 (talk) 17:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Alright, I've seen these two links. But since many of the upcoming films already have their articles so should I also create an article of it instead? ManaliJain (talk) 04:16, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

ManaliJain, not sure but if principal photography has begun then i think you can create a page.Princepratap1234 (talk) 07:14, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Okay, thank you!!   ManaliJain (talk) 08:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, sorry for asking this again, what should I do with the draft now? Just blank the page and not edit anymore so eventually it'll get deleted after six months or should I propose it for deletion again (which I don't think is right coz I had requested it for undeletion yesterday itself). I know it has got messed up but it all started with that sock making it a havoc and now I'm kinda confused with all this. ManaliJain (talk) 11:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

ManaliJain, just leave it , it will be deleted after 6 months.Princepratap1234 (talk) 11:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes alright, thank you again. ManaliJain (talk) 13:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of gal karke.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi, hope you're having a good day. Just wanted a quick opinion on whether GQ is considered a reliable source (according to me, it does)? This one by GQ India [2] mentions Gupta starring in the particular show (though we don't know his character's name yet) but can this one get added to the article? ManaliJain (talk) 05:53, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

ManaliJain, Read this [3] ,can be considered reliable for entertainment related things. Happy new year Manali!. Princepratap1234 (talk) 06:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yess, thanks. Happy new year to you too! ManaliJain (talk) 06:50, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Contact kijiye mujhe ek Article banwana hai ek Actor ke baare mein. Email - susovbloggs.immovableforce@gmail.com 2409:4060:10A:405F:0:0:2B1D:90B0 (talk) 20:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I am not sure if you are aware, this is a courtesy ping. A user has accused you of sockpuppetry here. 2405:201:4013:8136:BCD7:2385:E02A:2FD7 (talk) 23:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

A user is continuously doing false edits on Anupamaa . And that person do exactly same edits like an earlier blocked user on Duryodhana article. Surprisingly both have same names from television series Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai's characters Kartik+Naira=Kaira their son Kairav and new addition Kartik+Sirat=KaiRat. So I feel both are sockpuppet of each other. I'm providing link to their edits also: [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] Now comes her continuous disruptive fake edits on Anupamaa [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] Now on the basis of similarities of edits in Duryodhana, Wives of Karna and Vrishketu and the disruptive fake edits on Anupamaa again and again can we file a sockpuppetry case and disruptive fake edits case against her??? Pri2000 (talk) 20:41, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pri2000, you should file Sockpuppet investigation.Princepratap1234 (talk) 05:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

thanks Pri2000 (talk) 09:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Princepratap1234:I've filed the case. Kindly review it. And tell me if any changes are required

[25]Pri2000 (talk) 12:22, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have shifted your comments to the right place and you didn't reply to my message.Princepratap1234 (talk) 13:26, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

See Mr. Pratap please listen calmly what I'm saying. As I'm also saying this in a calm mood. Even I'm fed up with this fight. I doesn't know who that user is. What I just know is I creates talk pages for new editors. So did I today. Even I did it same for Adoringparas too. And many other new editors in past. I doesn't know how and why copied my language in her comment. But seeing her further sentence now I came to know that it's one other sock of Krishika Sahni aka Kiki. The master of everyone. I previously told you she always do stupidities. As I know her very well. So she did in the form of this new user Gari whatever this girl's further name is in this new account. The language "Huge Fan Following" is only used by her. Earlier also she added his "Insta King of the week" title given by Tellychakkar in his article. So she did today. Maybe she came to know about her sockpuppetry case. I doesn't know from where she came to know about it. Because I blocked her and she blocked me several months back. And I won't tell that ill mannered girl about the same. And sorry for booking case against you. But the editing history of my talk page only pointed towards you. Like you start any conversation with "Hi" and "Hey" so do they. Like you're a citizen of UP like me so do that IP. Even that person repeatedly used exactly the same language which you did. And Manali's email also. Made me observe the similarities between you both. I didn't filed the case intentionally to demean you. I was really fed up with that constant harrasment. Same happened with me last week also. And today you booked me falsely without even discussing like earlier. Like you did at that Tajmashaik time. I clearly told you that girl just copied my text. So the new user today by altering some text. I found that user new. And as per my nature created her talk page with the help of my talk page. But I didn't knew that it'll lead to sockpuppetry case and ugly fight between us. When it started intensifying I warned that user too. And I'm 100% sure she's Kiki. But it kept intensifying from both of us. Now I kept a calm in my mind and left you this message. Hope you'll understand what I'm trying to say. And will help me in filing that Gari in Kiki's case. I promise I'll not bother you. Pri2000 (talk) 14:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pri2000, ok I understand so we should stop all these things here.Princepratap1234 (talk) 14:35, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Princepratap1234:yes. Main apka case remove kr rhi hun. Ap mera kariye. Aur wo new user Gari jo bhi hai usko Kiki ke case mein merge kariye pleasePri2000 (talk) 14:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pri2000, Ok.Princepratap1234 (talk) 14:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I removed you from that complaint. I only mentioned those IPs who mentally harassed me Pri2000 (talk) 14:52, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pri2000, thanks and you are so sweet.Princepratap1234 (talk) 14:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ravensfire,ManaliJain, Pri2000, could you please file SPI case against him [27] as he is sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wefffrrr. Princepratap1234 (talk) 17:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

You retain access to this talk page solely so you can contest your block, not so you can engage in block evasion by proxy. --Yamla (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yamla, sorry but i was correct ,see [28].Princepratap1234 (talk) 13:44, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

For the final time. You have access to this talk page solely so you can contest your block. You will not get another warning. --Yamla (talk) 13:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why are you following Wikipedia editors over to commons? That looks like cross-wiki harassment, and I'm very close to asking a steward to globally lock your account. What was the purpose of those edits, if not harassment? Girth Summit _(blether) 17:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Girth Summit, I was telling her to file SPI as cutegirl1, was sock of Tajmashaik and I was right [29]. Princepratap1234 (talk) 17:56, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please read Yamla's comment above. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:59, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why did you choose that particular editor? Rather than, for example, a commons administrator? And what was that stuff about their college course? (Blaze Wolf, I don't consider them responding to questions from me to be a misuse of their talk page.) Girth Summit _(blether) 18:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Girth Summit,I asked her too [30] and directly to her[31]. Please see my talk page ManaliJain always ask help from me so I am very comfortable with her. I was blocked without being warned, See my contribution to Wikipedia ,I have been very good editor.Princepratap1234 (talk) 18:17, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

You were blocked with this reasoning: "Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse." I'm fairly sure you don't get warned when your account is blocked for that reason. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

You shouldn't need to be warned not to log out and leave harassing messages on people's talk pages from an IP. Again, why were you continuing to leave messages when they had asked you to stop? Why were you mentioning personal information like where they are studying, after they told you to stop pinging them? Girth Summit _(blether) 18:21, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Girth Summit, I am very sorry for that but she mailed to another user about me where she said wrong things about me [32]. See my contribution to Wikipedia ,I deserve a second chance.Princepratap1234 (talk) 18:26, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I mailed her and only revealed that we were been harassed by you behind those anonymous IPs and said the truth. And you really think that people like you who evade Wikipedia rules and harass other users deserve a second chance!? ManaliJain (talk) 18:35, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Revealing personal information about other editors in revenge for anything they have done is completely unacceptable under any circumstances. I have no mandate to investigate what Wikipedians write to each other in e-mails, only what they do on Wikipedia. I have requested Stewards, who deal with cross-wiki abuse, to look at those comments on commons and take appropriate action. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:32, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Girth Summit: @Blaze Wolf: Thank you, I really appreciate this. I've been getting stalked and facing harassment from this user for almost six months now. Earlier he used to do this with different IPs on Wikipedia and now through his user account on Wikimedia. You can check my talk page history and see how brutally he's been doing this anonymously through IPs and now I'm glad that the reality is out. ManaliJain (talk) 18:35, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I would really request you to either initiate a global lock for his account or at least protect my page for a few days, plus kindly make the necessary revision deletion regarding my personal details from Commons as I know he has stalked me severely and have intentionally revealed this information. ManaliJain (talk) 18:35, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

@ManaliJain: Can't. I'm not an admin. Just happened to see this user edit their talk page while blocked when my RC filters messed up. Unless you were referring to Girth ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:37, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I've taken all the steps I can here on enwiki; I've asked a commons admin and the stewards to investigate the cross-wiki stuff. If there's anything else you need, post on my talk; this conversation should end here. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:46, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

ManaliJain, sorry for that ,can I message you on whatsapp, want to sort things.Princepratap1234 (talk) 18:42, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I don't think the Manali would want to have you message them on Whatsapp since according to them you've been stalking and harassing them for six months. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Princepratap1234,

In case you are checking your talk page, please know that editing logged out as an IP editor, just increases the time until you can make a standard offer unblock request. If you ever wish to be unblocked, you should stop editing on the English Wikipedia immediately, in any capacity. Continuing to edit here just makes the chance that an unblock request will be rejected much more likely. You are easy to identify so continuing to edit will only backfire on you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:58, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Balika Vadhu 2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please refer to log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:06, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colors TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colors TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Girth Summit: Hey! Could you elaborate on "hasty." I have apellant over at UTRS. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ima send 'em to the Arbs for the CU block. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

UTRS appeal #77286 is closed. Not very convincing, but sent it to the Arbs. Been > 1.5 years. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:09, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I think 'hasty' referred to revoking their talk page access - I left them blocked, but reistated TPA to allow them to appeal. From what I can recall, this was one of those 'good hand account, badhand loutsock trolling' cases. Girth Summit _(blether) 11:27, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply