SpiritedMichelle

  Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --SubSeven (talk) 03:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, SpiritedMichelle. I understand you're a new editor, and your enthusiasm is beneficial and constructive. Welcome aboard. A couple of things: As per the guideline at WP:DATED, Wikipedia can't say things like "currently" or "recently" since such terms quickly become meaningless with time. Best to use such phrasing as "As of October 2013" or similar.

Also, I've noticed you enter a lot of raw URLs for citing. I ask you not do so but rather add properly cited footnotes, which include, at minimum, an article's title, date, newspaper/magazine name, and author (last name first). It's also good to add the date the article was accessed. You can find more information at WP:CITE, WP:FOOTNOTE and related pages.

Finally, I've noticed you sometimes add uncited claims in Reception sections, saying things like, "Many critics felt that this was the best episode of the season." Aside from Wikipedia needing exceptional sources for such superlative claims, you need to actually find and quote critics saying that particular thing.

I know this seems like a lot to take in, but like anything else, being a Wikipedia editor takes practice. The most important thing to keep in mind is that this is an encyclopedia. If newspaper are the first draft of history, an encyclopedia should be the final word: impeccably sourced concrete statements as neutral and accurate as humanly possible. Thanks again for joining us and Happy Wiki'ing! --Tenebrae (talk) 05:48, 31 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome, SpiritedMichelle. I've reverted or changed your edits to Thiago Soares, Marianela Núñez, Federico Bonelli, Lauren Cuthbertson, Sarah Lamb, Zenaida Yanowsky, and Maria Kochetkova that added the phrasing "As of November 2013..." to the lead sentences. See above, or send me a note, for an explanation.

Also, thank you for decapitalizing the title "principal" in those lead sentences. Dkreisst (talk) 03:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Spirited Michelle. Thank you for the note, that was a fine use of user talk space. Often, users like to keep both sides of a conversation on one page. If you feel this way, post your response here on this page: I will be monitoring it for any response.

Your edits were perfect based on the information User:Tenebrae gave to you with the link to WP:DATED. I changed the sentences because I felt that, while it seems that dancers' hierarchical positions do change pretty regularly in the ballet world, the status of the dancers was permanent enough that a specific date did not need to be attached to the time the article was last updated. That is, when the intro sentence reading "X is a British ballet dancer dancing as a soloist with the Royal Ballet" is no longer true, due to a change of company, promotion, or change of profession, the sentence can simply be updated when that happens. I found the style page Wikipedia:As of useful when trying to figure this out.

If you feel that the article would not be updated quickly enough, feel free to change it back. If you have any other questions about wikipedia, please feel free to drop me a note. Also, consider checking out Wikipedia:WikiProject Ballet and remember to be bold! Dkreisst (talk) 06:55, 12 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

You are doing just fine. Thank you for your work and for your patience in dealing with wikipedia policy. Let me know if you have any more questions. Dkreisst (talk) 00:57, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to San Francisco Ballet may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ], is notable for being the only uniquely San Francisco ''Nutcracker''. It features sets (including “a backdrop of San Francisco’s Victorian houses (known as “painted ladies”)<ref name="

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.

Hi! Thanks for adding the visitor numbers info to the British Museum page. Sorry to keep on about this (as it's been mentioned on your talk page before), but that wasn't a minor edit (as you actually added information and a reference). You do a lot of grammar corrections, which is great, and are classed as minor edits, even though they're important. But when you're adding info or categories or references, then they're not minor.

Anyway, any more info you've got for the British Museum would be great - given how important it is it'd be good to improve the page!

Thanks and all the best, GPRutter (talk) 09:05, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi again. Thanks! Yes, that's fine to respond there, or here - people tend to check back when they've left a message (on your contributions list it shows whether your edit is the current last edit or not). No problem, and do ask if there's anything that you're not sure about (although I've just re-started editing, so they've made some changes!). GPRutter (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Charming Charlie may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• <ref>{{cite web|title=Charming Charlie|url=http://stores.charmingcharlie.com/#fbid=KPZIGtb2zvh <ref

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi SpiritedMichelle, please note that I have reverted your addition of a DOB to Jess Weixler as you used IMDB as the source of the information. Per long standing consensus, IMDB is not a reliable source for biographical statistics in biography articles. You can read more about the use of IMDB here, here, and here.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 18:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ModCloth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Accessories (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Sustainable landscape architecture page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 3 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amsale Aberra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Couture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 3 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Event cinema, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Current affairs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maria Doyle Kennedy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |Episodes (3 episodes0

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Winter's Tale (ballet), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Watson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. See here and here for why I undid your format of the Critical reception section at the Orphan Black article. Per MOS:PARAGRAPHS, "Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading." Flyer22 (talk) 01:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Judd Hirsch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forever (TV series). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sara Mearns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swan Lake (ballet). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited La Mamounia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Five-star. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Svetlana Zakharova (dancer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sleeping Beauty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Orphanage

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Orphanage for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (speak) @ 18:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crown Princess (ship), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whittier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello everyone! I was just working on responding to a couple bug reports for a script that I worked up as part of a request from this project, and I noticed that only a couple people (who weren't even on this mailing list) are actually using the script. A little history on the script: In March of 2014, Jim Cartar came to my user talk page and said he needed some help in acquiring a script for a backlog drive that he was working on that could keep track of and score deOrphanings for a scored backlog drive. I took that request to the project's talk page (BackLog Drive "DO" (De-Orphaning) script proposal) and there was near unanimous support for this. I thought about the proposal and decided the best way to do it was to build a new script (which is still no where near as comprehensive as Manishearth's OrphanTabs) and build into it a mechanism that will make BLD scoring easy.

What I'm wondering at this point is, since there appears to be only two people using the script, should I continue to develop this script with a goal of using it for scoring BLDs or just debug the existing script and leave it at that. Thanks for any replies or comments.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

• This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 14:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mezzo-soprano may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * Ariadne, ''[[The Minotaur (opera)|The Minotaur]]'' )[[Harrison Birtwistle|Birtwistle]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:56, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, was it your intention to remove sources and content that was properly cited or was this an accident?4meter4 (talk) 02:31, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

No I did not.SpiritedMichelle (talk) 03:41, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ten Thousand Villages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Products. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Could you please take a look at TAFI. I have nominated both Gustaf and Bill Skarsgård. Could need some more input. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 06:13, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

…at the Gilsig article, assist us on preventing the continued addition of material without sources. See ALL CAPS messages appearing in the article in edit mode. Le Prof [Leprof_7272] 73.210.154.39 (talk) 17:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, SpiritedMichelle! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 21:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I redirected it as I don't believe it merits its own article. Firstly, all the info in the page is already on the Jessica Jones page. Secondly, its the only episode that has its own page (so far). Its also an orphan so no other pages on WP reach it. So my decision to create a redirect. Just my 2c Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Ana María Martínez at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

In addition to the c/e, I removed the uncited career section, per BLP; please ensure any further material you add there is properly cited from reliable, third-party sources. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sonja Sohn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Originals. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Brianhe. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Belstaff seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 23:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stella Abrera, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Stella Abrera".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 01:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anna Valentine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luxury. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prabal Gurung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nepalese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Michal Negrin, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michal Negrin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juana Matias, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Women in the United States House of Representatives into Draft:List of Women in the United States House of Representatives. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List current female members in the United States House of Representatives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 09:45, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I am falsely accused of getting paid by the wiki editor... I hereby state that i have no personal relationship with the celebrity. I am an honorable journalist who saw something wrong and went ahead to correct the mistakes. Kindly observe that all sources are credible n verified. Yet the template is giving a wrong message about our favorite celebrity and me when im just an honest editor. I seek clean up of the templates as i was being a honest journalist. VeronicaJoseph5 (talk) 02:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC) VeronicaJoseph5 (talk) 02:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I don't know if you realized this, but the explanation for the nomination is missing from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Park furniture. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please stop renaming articles while ignoring its content. The content of the article should come first, not its resembles with the titles of the other articles. When you title an article "Dance in Ukraine", the implication is that the article will describe the dances of different nationalities within the same country, which are clearly more than just Ukrainians, there are quite enough minority groups, which also have their own dances. However, the article instead describes the national dance of Ukrainians as an ethnic group and also covers its performance outside of the country in other countries. It turns out that the title of the article does not correspond to the content at all, whereas the previous one was correct. And that's not to say that renaming the articles on traditional dance to general dance of the country is also wrong. Especially given that the article continues to be linked with an article in another language describing only traditional dances. Solidest (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Book of the Month, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little Fires Everywhere. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

What Do I See On The Seat Of This Costume,Worn By Rachael Flatt?:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/FlattEx1a.jpg Jackjohnson52183 (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

You recently removed from the Stardust article the only non-lede mention of the fact that the novel was adapted into a film. Given that it was a major feature film with big-name stars, frankly it deserved more space in "adaptations" than the one sentence it had. A (sourced) sentence about the film remains in the introduction, and given that the introduction is supposed to be a summary of the body of the article, it should appear in that adaptation section as well.

I have retired from article editing, or I'd reintroduce the material myself. I do request that you review your edit and consider reinsertion. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I see you’re a member of the Fashion WikiProject - I’ve made some proposals to update the article about Daphne Guinness, posted here Talk:Daphne Guinness#Request Edits for February 2023. Because I have a conflict of interest, I can’t do these edits myself. Could you have time to look at these and consider? Thank you very much.YhSA99b3tTnCnLdr (talk) 19:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

That's from 2019 and I only see it now, new to that wikiproject. Since you took the photos then you're owner of these photos and they're welcome at commons. If an event is recent enough, see also n:Wikinews:Photo essay. Does this help? Have you attended an event and photographed it recently? Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 23:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Drew Meekins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny O'Shea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply