Nisingh.8

  Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ritvik Arora have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ManaliJain (talk) 13:45, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your due diligence, I am aware of MOS:FILMACCOLADES and had also reviewed pattern and references being used under general awards and recognition sections for other notable Hindi television and cine pages. Lions Gold Award finds a recurring mention at multiple pages. Please see List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra , List of awards and nominations received by Parineeti Chopra, Divya Khosla Kumar#Awards and nominations, Bharat Ka Veer Putra – Maharana Pratap#Lions Gold Awards

Some other news references on SOL Lions Gold Awards are here [1] or [2]. I hope you will review your reverts in light of these. Thanks again for reading! Nisingh.8 (talk) 14:20, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of British champions in decathlon/heptathlon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Begonia rex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Light intensity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

SerialNumber54129 15:57, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Squared.Circle.Boxing. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. The edit you templated CSB over is 18 months old, and your claim that your reversion is 'per talk' is misleading. Such discussion is buried deep in the archive, which only goes to indicate how long this material has been the status quo. SerialNumber54129 15:57, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Asaram. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:29, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply