Mac Edmunds

 

John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 12:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

That's good to see. Many congrats. KJP1 (talk) 13:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Amazing! @KJP1, thank you for your help in getting the article to a submittable standard - it looks great.

Mac Edmunds (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Ca, Thank you for reviewing the article - much appreciated.

Mac Edmunds (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome! Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arthur Wellesley, 4th Duke of Wellington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to John Dodd (engineer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Facebook and Youtube are not reliable sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:24, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I agree that it should've been a draft. Having had my first article, John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar, approved, I can now approve drafts myself. It seems to automatically approve itself, so I am unsure as to how I can create a draft. Please could you let me know for future reference? Mac Edmunds (talk) 19:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The original article still exists, and has now been connected to the relevant WikiData page. Is there a way that it could be deleted, to avoid confusion while I work on the draft? Mac Edmunds (talk) 19:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I will request the article's deletion on your behalf. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Mac Edmunds (talk) 20:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello again,

Just to point out, I agree that social media platforms of Facebook and YouTube ilks, are usually unreliable sources, as not peer reviewed. However, the Facebook posts have been made by children of Dodd, who I am sure are reliably informed for obvious reasons. I can accept that this does not prove notability as it is a primary source, however I maintain that it is accurate.

As for the YouTube sources, each come from reliable independent journalists, who have columns and websites outside of YouTube. Here is a list of the relevant videos and why they're reliable:

Car & Classic: This is the platform that sold "The Beast", meaning their information would be accurate, as supplied from the Dodd family themselves.

Throttle House: Two reliable independent journalists, who have formal content outside of YouTube, and whose information would be accurate as supplied by "The Beast's" current owner.

TLBS: Presented by Jonny Smith, a reliable independent journalist who has written for magazines, and formal television programmes.

The only other video(s) are from Suzanne Dodd, daughter of John Dodd, whose information would be reliable for obvious reasons, although does not prove notability.

Mac Edmunds (talk) 21:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The fact that they're journalists outside of YouTube doesn't affect their reliability, unless they're considered experts, in which case they might be reliable outside of publication in a traditional media outlet. I recommend working on the draft more and submitting it through AfC. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey! I'd recommend that you make an article on "The Beast" itself, as it seems that interestingly, it has a better claim to notability than John Dodd himself. OhHaiMark (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @OhHaiMark

I did consider that when I made the page, especially considering ‘The Beast’ is the main topic of the page.

However, I think Dodd gains notability from the engineering feat of building an aero-engined car, and not the other way around. Plus, his eccentric life outside of his car is also interesting.

Mac Edmunds (talk) 15:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notability is about what sources say. If the sources primarily discuss the Beast, the article should be about that. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Princess Olga Dolgorouky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 14:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for reviewing the page!

Mac Edmunds (talk) 14:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lord Berners, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 21:18, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @BlueboyLINY. Apologies for not giving a reason. When the template was added (07/12/2015), the article only had 8 citations. As it has 28, I thought that validated my removal of the template.

Mac Edmunds (talk) 06:38, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply