Moorlock

Hi Moorlock, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

Editing tutorial, learn to have fun with Wikipedia. Picture tutorial, instructions on uploading images. How to write a great article, to make it an featured article status. Manual of Style, how articles should be written.

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

RC Patrol - Keeping a lookout for vandalism. Cleanup - Help make unreadable articles readable. Requests - Wanted on WP, but hasn't been created. Merge - Combining duplicate articles into one. Wikiprojects - So many to join, so many to choose from...Take your pick!

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 02:00, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hi, welcome and thank you for your contributions but please don't submit material lifted from copyrighted sources. Those edits will have to be reverted.

Regards, Lotsofissues 07:04, 10 May 2005 (UTC) ›››Leave Me a Message‹‹‹Reply

Sorry for the misunderstanding. I found a webpage that contained the same text - it must be your page?

Regards, Lotsofissues 18:19, 11 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I just wanted to thank you for the excellent work you've done to improve the Tax resistance article. Cheers! -- BD2412 ^talk June 28, 2005 18:15 (UTC)

Hello. I noticed that you've created a number of articles on various tax resistors. Do you think you could expand them to include a mention of why they are notable for doing so, as I don't know that just refusing to pay taxes, even for moral reasons, automatically makes someone notable. Thanks --Icelight 19:29, August 2, 2005 (UTC)

Excellent! That's really all I wanted to make sure of. If you have one or two primary sources that you're working from that are accesible online, I'd be glad to help. --Icelight 00:41, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

You just put Sally Belfrage in Category:Tax resisters. This isn't mentioned in her article, and I didn't know about it previously. Where have you verified this? --Ashawley 15:03, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Can I ask what your source is that Mary Russell, Duchess of Bedford was a tax resistor, please? Thanks Craigy (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello. May I ask your source re: tax resistance, regarding my father, Robert Claiborne? Thanks.

Nice articles. I did a few minor format changes and made a category to group them all under. Are you a researcher on such organizations, or were you at one time involved with them? (I've known several Nuwaubians, and almost became one myself) --FuriousFreddy 14:58, 11 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Whether or not York raped those kids is something I'll never be sure of (I never met him, so I don't have any sort of character judgement ot make). But the Nuwaubians that I did meet were some of the nicest people that I've known (except for when I and some others couldn't afford to pay $100 a month--we were college students!-- and the classes stopped), even if some of the beliefs were a bit unusual. They started holding classes among my college friends when were all 19, and I guess me being a insecure and (admittedly) somewhat gullible teenager, I started going too. --FuriousFreddy 16:30, 11 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

I'd like to know what Nuwaubian books if any Moorlock you actually do own. It appears most of the work you've created for this article is coming from user created websites which are notoriously errant. Nuwaubian Hotep 16:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Moorlock wrote:

Please do not correct misspellings in quoted material when those misspellings are marked with "[sic]," for instance, in the Nuwaubianism page, which you have incorrectly corrected three times now. -Moorlock 19:13, 7 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oh dear. I am terribly sorry about this. I do occasionally fail to notice things like this at first, and have to go back and revert myself, but I really should have noticed this by the third time. If anything else, I should have remembered that I had already edited the page twice before, also the [sic] is clearly visible next to the word. Having made more than 5000 corrections of this type – 99.9% of which are hopefully useful – I sometimes get into the habit of not always reading everything through properly before I change it. I add all the pages that I change to my watchlist, which I do occasionally scan for reversions of my edits, but unfortunately this plan has backfired somewhat as there are now over 5000 pages on there, and it's difficult to pick out anything useful from the mass of unrelated changes.

Once again, my apologies for the annoyance I have caused, and thanks for reverting my changes. To be on the safe side I have made a note of Nuwaubianism and not to change it for this word; I will take extra care if it comes up in other searches -- Gurch 20:34, 7 March 2006 (UTC) MOorlock Information should not be relied on, if he really Thinks Dwight York, Started the Yamassee Native Americans over 400 years ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.62.46.153 (talk) 03:42, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please do not correct spelling errors in quoted material when the spelling errors are marked with "[sic]", as you did recently on the Dwight York page.

I apologise for the inconvenience. Welcome to wikipedia. May I suggest you put the quotes around the quoted passages (using two apostrophes '' at either end) so that it comes out in italics as quoted text. ॐ Metta Bubble ^puff 21:42, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

From the Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style:

Quotations

There is normally no need to put quotations in italics unless the material would otherwise call for italics (emphasis, use of non-English words, etc.). Indicate whether using the italics in the original text or whether they were added later.

-Moorlock 22:07, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Also, why have you linked the sic? It's not relevant to the content of the article. ॐ Metta Bubble ^puff 06:16, 11 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I link it because some folks don't know what it means. It's just obscure enough that a clarifying link might be helpful. Judgement call. A good argument could be made against linking it. -Moorlock 06:22, 11 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Maybe we could phrase an introduction to the quotation text so that it isn't confusing? We shouldn't be linking editorial comments. My mistake was more because I was doing 100 edits in a 5 minute, than because I don't know the meaning of sic. Also, if you're having this problem regularly with people editing something that needs to stay (which it seems you are), you can put an html comment into the text so that a message shows up when someone goes to correct the edit. Something along the lines of <!-- MISSPELLING INTENDEED, PLEASE LEAVE -->. Is that helpful? Peace. ॐ Metta Bubble ^puff 06:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

At tax avoidance I edited and, I think, improved the article. My edit was reverted without explanation, anonymously. Did you agree with that reversion? My edit was then reinstated with the comment "rv vandalism". You undid this reinstatement of my edit with the explanation that you disagreed or did not understand the reason for the edit. I suggest that what needs to be judged is the quality of the edit, not the reason given for it. The aim is to improve the quality of then encyclopedia. I'm sure you agree. So, please explain why the version you re-introduced, the one prior to my edit, is better than my version. In the interim I am reinstating my edit. Paul Beardsell 08:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

can you email me the resume? I can't get it. mailinator711@yahoo.com Scratch that, i got it.--Muchosucko 21:37, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi Moorlock, I made a quick search and found [1] which mentions "Mrs. Israel Zangwill". Our article is about a Mr. Israel Zangwill, so some verification/proof would be very much appreciated. Thank you, colleague. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 01:35, 13 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

my bad -Moorlock 02:12, 13 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Template:Anti-war topics is up for deletion. Please weigh in on the discussion. Thanks! SchuminWeb (Talk) 09:36, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi Matt, sweet picture of Frank Chu, I would recommend you update the picture page with the date and time the pict was taken I assume it was bay to breakers 2006 in Alamo square if this is correct it would be cool if your picture had the facts. Date, time, place - cheers --Paul E. Ester 04:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Howdy, I noticed that you and I seem to post in one or two articles dealing with progressive issues in political science/sociology. There's currently a debate beginning in Boston Tea Party as to whether the article should include the category [2]. It meets definitions set in the articles Terrorism and Definition of terrorism, however, there are several self-proclaimed patriots who watch BTP who refuse to recognise the fact. The simple criteria for terrorism generally seem to be intimidation or destruction of property in order to change public policy or public opinion while a state of war has not yet been declared. Some users would rather use recent acts of terrorism as a yardstick, rather than using a firm definition, and hence lose their ability to discuss matters calmly. Would you be able to pop in to the Talk page and join in the discussion? Thanks much, samwaltz 05:08, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nice job on the template! I made the image smaller and the text bigger (I hope you don't mind) so it's less intrusive. Why is it called Thoreauviana though? -- Chrissperanza! chat edits 16:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! — Sebastian 02:24, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

You've twice now edited Nuwaubianism to change "oftentimes" to "often" in quoted text from a source in a footnote. Please do not make stylistic, grammar, and other such changes to direct quotes. If you're going to use a robot to make vast changes for style, spelling, grammar, and such, you need to verify by inspection that these changes are correct and appropriate. -Moorlock 03:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Moorlock. My apologies for changing the quoted text. I do in fact inspect the changes my bot makes before approving them, it's just in this case I slipped up (twice!) and didn't notice that it was modifying quoted material. I might note that I've changed oftentimes to often in >500 articles (and specifically left it alone in a number of others where I saw it was inappropriate to change it), and only got one complaint so far, so I don't think that's too bad a track record. Perfection would be nice, of course, but I'm afraid I'm only human. In any event, I've made note of this exception in my bot and it won't happen again. Cheers, CmdrObot 19:47, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Moorlock, Thanks for your comments on Talk:IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program. However, you only answered one piece of the suggestion. The main point was to merge all the U.S. tax form articles. Perhaps I should have picked a better talk page. The VITA was sort of a additional one I added in last minute as it seemed to relate. I wanted to ask that you take another look and add your support or opposition to merging the U.S. tax forms such as Form 2553, Form 2555, Form W-4, Form W-8BEN, Form W-9, Form 1040EZ, Form 1040A, Form 1040X, Form 1040 into Tax forms in the United States. Thanks Morphh ^(talk) 13:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why did you take down my section on whether or not Dwight York was guilty? The cites were valid and the info was true.

The information in the section you added was inaccurate (as I indicated in the "edit summary" when I reverted your edit). If the wording were more accurate and precise, it could be a useful addition. -Moorlock 23:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Touche. My poor spelling was only reinforced by the redirect for the spelling-impaired. Since the influence of the essay forms a large part of the article, I think it should be noted in the lead; but I'll defer to your judgement. Regards, Venicemenace 00:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Could you please reproduce the section you are referencing in this edit. Specifically, I'm concerned about some of the details: did they cut all telephone communication? who were the 40, were they selected at random? From whom was money or goods taken, etc. Many thanks, Tewfik^Talk 03:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I understand that it could be tiresome to reproduce the text. Perhaps you could just clarify the points above that you are basing the statements on and/or provide specific page numbers for the cited statements? Thank you, Tewfik^Talk 16:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Again, I'd very much appreciate if you could provide specific page numbers for the statements and/or quote the relevant lines. Thank you, Tewfik^Talk 22:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I never asked you to type the section by hand. I made a perfectly reasonable and polite request for either the specific line/s, or their page numbers. Tewfik^Talk 00:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I know exactly where the document is located. I want to know what the page numbers for the assertions are. Tewfik^Talk 00:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I noticed you added Category:American tax resisters to the Walter Lowenfels article. Could you tell me your reasons for doing so? The article is just a stub at the moment, but there is nothing at all about his (supposed) tax resistance. Could you point me to your source for including Lowenfels in this category? Thanks -- hibou 07:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

You wrote:

Zinn co-signed a declaration of tax resistance in 1968)

Would you cite a source for this information?

Thanks!

Skywriter 18:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for responding.

you wrote:

Howard Zinn & tax resistance

Cite: “Writers and Editors War Tax Protest” January 30, 1968 New York Post (also published elsewhere) -Moorlock :18:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

I appreciate your enthusiasm for tax resistance but do not believe one incident nearly 40 years ago qualifies for inclusion in the category of tax resistance. Tax resistance is not something he has advocated over the years, or do you have evidence of the opposite.

Best regards,

Skywriter 21:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

you wrote:

The category is "American tax resisters" and is meant to include those people who have practiced the tactic of :tax resistance, without regard to how long ago or how many "incidents". (And anyway, he's not averse to putting :in an occasional plug for Thoreauvian tax :resistance even today.) -Moorlock 00:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Great! That works for me. Fresh as the morning muffins. Thanks. I will place your link on the Zinn talk page for reference. Skywriter 03:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi -- I removed your newly added Category:American tax resisters from the Orville Schell entry because it's not cited and I couldn't find any authority for it in a quick google search. I do see that there is an author, Jonathan Schell, who advocates withholding taxes in protest of American war efforts, so perhaps you're thinking of him. Feel free to add it back if O.S. is really a tax resister or advocate but if you could, please add a little content on that and a reference. If it's really J.S. that would be interesting too. Thanks. Wikidemo 04:46, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you pointing out my clear error in overlooking the reference to Crumley's tax resistance in the text. I didn't recall it being there when I had edited the article in the past, and didn't see it on a quick read now. My apologies for the reversion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk/cont) 23:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:FitzHughLudlow.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 00:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Render_unto_Caesar...&diff=90335442&oldid=90334617

No, IMHO, curly quotes do not look nicer, and I went to a great deal of trouble to remove the blasted things. *sigh* Mdotley 02:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please stop reverting the eserver.org linkspam I keep deleting. This has been thoroughly discussed at WPSPAM and COIN. (Requestion 03:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC))Reply

You will be templated if you revert my eserver.org spam deletions. I will give you a moment to undo your reverts. Take this up with WPSPAM and COIN if you have a problem. Besides, 9 eserver.org links on the Henry David Thoreau article is excessive. (Requestion 04:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC))Reply

I agree with your concern about Requestion's mass deletion of apparently useful links (see my comments at User talk:Requestion). Thanks for speaking up about it. -- Rbellin|Talk 04:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry Rbellin but you are wrong. This spam removal is justified and sanctioned. I really don't want to see either of you blocked, so can please stop the reverting? (Requestion 20:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC))Reply

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. eserver.org (Requestion 20:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC))Reply

From the Wikipedia:External_links policy:

Wikipedia articles can include links to Web pages outside Wikipedia. Such pages could contain further research that is accurate and on-topic; information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks); or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to their reliability (such as reviews and interviews).

Some external links are welcome [such as]....

• Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons.
• Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews.
• ...
• For albums, movies, books, and other creative works, links to professional reviews.

The links you have been removing fit this category and do not fit the "Links normally to be avoided" category at all. For instance, you have been removing from the Slavery in Massachusetts page a link to Editorial Savoir Faire: Thoreau Transforms His Journal into “Slavery in Massachusetts”, a scholarly article describing in detail how Henry David Thoreau transformed the content of his journal into the essay that is the topic of the Wikipedia page in question. This cannot be justified under any of the guidelines on the Wikipedia External Links policy page. Please stop overzealously removing useful external links that fit Wikipedia's policy. -Moorlock 00:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

In response to your message on my Talk page: I don't think "vandal" is the right word for what User:Requestion is doing, and I'd like to be careful to assume the good faith of Requestion's edits. But your message just above is completely in the right, and I am similarly frustrated by Requestion's complete non-responsiveness to reasonable concerns about these deletions, and especially by the curt, officious and even borderline threatening responses to our comments ("I really don't want to see either of you blocked," and the inappropriate use of the spam warning template above, both seem like attempts to intimidate rather than resolve disagreement to me). The next reasonable step would be either to leave a brief note explaining the problem at WP:ANI or to begin an RfC proceeding on Requestion, and if you do either one of these you'll have my support. I don't have time to do much work on this, and I usually try to stay clear of Wikipedia proceduralism, so I can't promise much substantial comment, though. (If you do this, be careful not to exaggerate your complaint or drop words like "vandal" too lightly, but instead provide example diffs for specific cases of Requestion's inappropriate behavior so that the people who review your complaint will see the problem for themselves.) -- Rbellin|Talk 02:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm being honest when I said that I don't want to see either of you blocked. Why can't you stop the blanket reverting? You need to understand all that I do is Wikipedia proceduralism and this is a justified maintenance operation. Thanks for the ANI report and thank you for calling me a vandal. (Requestion 17:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC))Reply

  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. eserver.org diff diff diff diff diff diff diff diff diff (Requestion 19:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC))Reply

Once again, Requestion, it's completely inappropriate to use a spam warning template here. You may disagree with Moorlock, and both of you may be repeatedly reverting each other, but neither one of you is spamming. -- Rbellin|Talk 19:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

If ironic is too leading, "perhaps significant" is far too vague. Let us say exactly what we intend, or take it out. Mdotley 17:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

In the first place, if Jesus was opposed to the use of money, Judas would not have been carrying any on his group's behalf. In the second place, the passage never says he isn't carrying any money, (that's merely an inference from the fact that he asks for someone else to show one), and in the third place, "perhaps significant" statements don't belong in an encyclopedia. We should either explain it or drop it, which I will do, if you don't object. Mdotley 20:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Garlawolu.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 21:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Garlawolu2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 21:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, Moorlock, As soon as I spotted Category:American tax resisters on Dorothy Sterling's article, I had a darn good idea who must have added it. :) Would you please be good enough to add a sentence to the article concisely explaining the facts regarding her having been a tax resister? Categories should always be supported in the text of articles. By the way, in the article about Abby Kelley (the subject of one of Sterling's books), I just added links to two terms that have articles: No taxation without representation and tax resistance. Thought you'd like to know! Cgingold 12:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I noticed you put Fred J. Cook in the category Tax resisters but I went back to his autobiography and read some other articles and I can't find anything about tax resisting. There are several Fred Cooks. Are you sure you meant Fred J. Cook? Thanks Garnetpoint 02:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:GarawoluLetter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 19:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:DontStopMyLove.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:LostChildrenOfBabylon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Nuwaubic reference was removed Dec 27. Just a heads up Nuwaubian Hotep (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has nominated Russell Kanning, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell Kanning and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have tagged Image:PassionDwightYork.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:01, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:LuckyDuckyComic.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:DevilDinosaur.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:04, 24 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Could you take more care with your bot not to remove HTML paragraph tags from within blockquotes? When a blockquote contains multiple paragraphs, you need these tags to keep the paragraphs separate. If you remove them, even if there are linefeeds between the paragraphs in the source, the paragraphs will end up concatinated when the wiki page is viewed. See, for instance, your recent changes to Nuwaubianism. -Moorlock (talk) 20:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Moorlock,

Thanks for your message on my talk page. This would be something to bring up at WT:AWB, as I have no control over how AWB formats a page. That is set in motion by the developers of the program. I can set it to not format any pages, but it catches many problems automatically. This is the first time I'm hearing of the problem, and the AWB developers are probably as unaware of the problem as I was. Rest assured that I will revert myself (if you have not already done so) on this article. There has to be, however, a better way than to rely on HTML coding in order to get the text to perform a line break, as there would be no point in using Wiki mark-up if it couldn't be substituted for HTML. Firsfron of Ronchester 20:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article George Benson (Quaker), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Undeath (talk) 16:54, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated Washitaw Nation, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washitaw Nation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Doug Weller (talk) 16:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm working through the backlog and I saw you had a very old outstanding request. I have whitelisted this subdomain. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

• Image:MakuSpeaks.jpg
• Image:Man from planet rizq.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated George Benson (Quaker), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Benson (Quaker). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Undead Warrior (talk) 15:27, 4 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Nuwaubic.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:23, 19 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

In case you're not aware of it, the article Good Germans was transwikied to Wiktionary, and it's deletion is now being contested at Deletion Review. Cgingold (talk) 10:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated Rizq, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rizq. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Deconstructhis (talk) 07:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated Barathary gland, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barathary gland. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Deconstructhis (talk) 07:34, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

ADM, before you go deleting big hunks of the page wholesale, please discuss your proposed changes here. Your "Religious views on tax resistance" page might be a good idea, and might well absorb some of the content on this page, but I'm not convinced of the wisdom of how you divided it up and I think it needs more thought. Have you looked into Robert McGee's cross-cultural/cross-religious studies of attitudes toward tax paying and tax resistance? That might help you expand your new page beyond its current Christian-only focus. —— (talk) 16:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I could expand it, it would not really be very hard to go beyond Christian perspectives. My point though is that it is wrong that the phrase render unto Caesar be understood exclusively in terms of tax resistance, because it is more than just that, it notably includes the concepts of civil allegiance, Church-State separation and political neutrality.

The part about resisting taxes is also fairly irrelevant to the Caesar article because the vast majority of Christians throughout history have accepted not what their own consciences tell them, like what the libertarians do, but what the Church teaches. The global Church has always supported paying taxes, because that's the majority position, and that's why most people have continued to pay taxes.

ADM (talk) 23:30, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don't think there is such thing as "The global Church," and various Christian denominations have a variety of teachings about what constitutes a legitimate taxing authority, what taxes are legitimate, and when the obligation to pay a tax might be overridden by another obligation. Some, like the Mormons, tend to support tax-paying no matter what; while others, like the Mennonites & Quakers, believe that Christians must carefully weigh conflicting obligations before voluntarily submitting to taxation. This article tries, in part, to show how different Christians and different denominations have reconciled their understanding of Christian duties about taxation with this particular biblical episode. Please refrain from mass-deletions like the ones you have recently made. - — (talk) 01:25, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm excluding small sects and cults from my methodology, because those groups are the most likely to literally become outlawed in the real world, outside small rural regions of the United States, which is the only place where their views are given de facto attention. Also, I would like to add that if you don't like the article religious views on tax resistance, then you should propose it for deletion, because it is simply intolerable to have the same exact text in two separate entries. If you don't want it deleted, then you should accept the principle that the text should not be at two places at the same time. ADM (talk) 02:47, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your methodology? Quakers and Mennonites being small sects and cults unworthy of interest? Whatever. If your new page does end up just being a duplication of the bulk of another page then, yeah, it probably should be axed. I was hoping you were just planning to use that information to get you started on something more substantial. I wish you luck on that project and hope it turns out well. — (talk) 03:33, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm not against quoting Quakers and Mennonites per se, I'm just against presenting their views as if they were very important, extremely important. They are actually less than 1 % of all Christians, and we can only present their views after we take into account the other 99 % of Christians. The Caesar page is POV because it looks like a piece of unadulerated Quaker propaganda. ADM (talk) 03:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Alexander Shields has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article lacks context and doesn't state notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 17:59, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

An article that you have edited is currently up for deletion. Please take a moment to respond.Ikip (talk) 00:30, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

It is so frustrating to work so hard to build an article only to see it be put up for deletion. I am sorry to see so many of your contributions put at risk. As an editor of 4 years, I have had over 4000 of my edits deleted. thankfully I have found some wonderful solutions, first this, called userfication:

		The article you created was just deleted?
		All is not lost. Here is what you can do right now:
		Many administrators will be happy to give you a copy of your deleted article, either by putting it on a special user page for you (a process called userfication) or by e-mailing you a copy. List of administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles (empty) no pages or subcategories Once you have the article, you can try to resolve the issues why it was deleted. How to find the reason for deletion (not required to get your article undeleted) You can find out why your article was deleted:   On this log page, once you enter the name of your page, this will show you who deleted it and why. If the reason doesn't make sense, try clicking any links on the reason, or you can ask by typing {{help}} followed by your question on your talk page. Or you can ask any administrator to tell you why it was deleted. 1. If your article is deleted because of notability, it was deleted because you didn't give us enough information to confirm that people had published articles, books, or other publications to verify the claims your article made. You'll simply need to find some published articles that covered the subject of your article. While this may not be possible for some subjects (your cat, your garage band), you'd be surprised how easy it is, and people are happy to help on the help desk or in projects like the Article Rescue Squadron if you ask politely and tell them as much as you can. 2. If your article was deleted because it was a "copyvio", or copyright violation, an administrator removed it because it violated someone's copyright on their work. Only public domain information can be copied without permission — this does not include most web pages or images. You can rewrite the article so that it is no longer a copyright violation, you can request permission from the copyright holder to republish their work, or if and only if you are the copyright holder you can donate your work to the project or release it under a license compatible with Wikipedia's. If you've repaired the article, or you believe the reasons for deleting the article were in error, you can dispute the deletion at Deletion Review. Generally, you must show how the previous deletion(s) were in error, but this is the place to resolve disputes about whether a deletion was wrong.

The second is a wonderful group I found 18 months ago, which I wish I would have found 4 years ago, which changed my whole view of wikipedia. We help rescue articles from deletion, and I would like to invite you to join:

Hello, Moorlock. You have been invited to join the Article Rescue Squadron, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. For more information, please visit the project page, where you can >> join << and help rescue articles tagged for deletion and rescue. Ikip (talk) 00:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ikip (talk) 00:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:PassionDwightYork.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bizarre, I know, but:

[3]

We're trying to track down the cause of the problem at https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22389 . I wonder whether you would be kind enough to let us know what browser/operating system you are using there. Conrad.Irwin (on wikt) 20:58, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ah, it seems you have the LastPass plugin for google chrome installed. Sorry to have disturbed you, just something to watch out for in future. Conrad.Irwin (on wikt) 21:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

That's really odd. I'll disable lastpass for now. -— (talk) 21:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm having the same issue. I'm in contact with the LastPass support team, trying to get it sorted out. What version of Chrome are you running? Throwaway85 (talk) 22:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Chrome 4.0.249.78 (36714) for Windows, LastPass 1.64.1 -— (talk) 22:49, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

So the problem was fixed in the latest lastpass build. It hasn't been released yet, but you can download it here: https://rodan.lastpass.com/lpchromepre.crx

Hello. Doubting Thoreau´s pacifism and his importance for anarcho-pascifism is strange. Please explain this.--Eduen (talk) 01:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thoreau explicitly argued against pacifism and defended the armed insurrection of John Brown. He unambiguously was not a pacifist. I agree that his theories on civil disobedience have been influential in pacifist circles. -— (talk) 01:52, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brother Jed. Jaque Hammer (talk) 19:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for finding this interesting information and adding it to articles. However I am concerned that you might also be saying that some people are tax resisters based on signing it. It's one thing to sign a petition, which is lawful, and another thing to fail to pay taxes, which is unlawful. I don't think we can assume that people actually failed to pay their taxes just because they signed the petition or pledge.   Will Beback  talk  22:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

It was more than a petition; it was a pledge that said in part "None of us voluntarily will pay the proposed 10% income tax surcharge or any war-designated tax increase." I'd argue that such a pledge amounts to tax resistance. —Moorlock (talk) 23:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

The article on tax resistance says: Tax resistance is the refusal to willingly pay a tax because of opposition to the institution that is imposing the tax, or to some of that institution’s policies. It doesn't mention the threat or pledge to refuse to pay taxes. The mere suggestion that one will commit an act is not the same as committing it. If I yelled at someone, "I'm gonna kill you", that does not make me a murderer. It seems likely that for most of the signatories it was intended as a symbolic protest rather than an actual commitment to break the law. Unless sources specifically say that they followed up on their pledges they should not be included in the tax resisters category.   Will Beback  talk  23:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Further, do we even know if this proposed surcharge was even levied? A pledge to not pay a proposed tax seems even more remote from being a tax resister than pledging not to pay an existing tax.   Will Beback  talk  23:56, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

If "tax resistance is the refusal to willingly pay a tax" then saying "we will not voluntarily pay this tax" sounds to me like the genuine item. That's what refusal sounds like. As to whether or not particular signers backed up their refusal with further action, I'm sure you're right that it would require more in-depth case-by-case research. I believe the 10% income tax surcharge was signed into law in June of 1968 and applied to that year and to 1969 and part of 1970 (at a lower rate). —Moorlock (talk) 00:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm looking this up in newspaper archives. Yes, it appears that the surcharge was passed. However I can't find any articles talking about failures to pay it. Without seeing the text of the pledge, it apears off-hand that the signers were motivated by opposition to the Vietnam War rather than to the surcharge or the general authority of the Fedweral government to collect taxes. Additionally, the advertisement is a primary source. This pledge seems to have received scant attention in secondary sources. The New York Times did an article on it which names some of the signatories, but it's mostly concerned with explaining why the paper refused to publish the ad (even though one of their editors was an organizer). Given that WP biographies are generally quite short, I'm concerned that adding a sentence about this pledge may represent undue weight. For the names mentioned in the NYT article, we have a second source. But for those who do not appear in a secondary source I think we'd be better off leaving this out entirely.   Will Beback  talk  00:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think you may be misunderstanding tax resistance. Refusing or resisting a tax because of opposition to the policies of the institution collecting the tax (e.g. the Vietnam War) is very much in the scope of tax resistance. There are also some examples of tax resistance that have come from people who oppose a particular tax or the general authority of the government to collect taxes, but that's not the most typical case. It sounds like you may be thinking about the tax protester crowd, which is a different sort of beast. —Moorlock (talk) 00:50, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Be that as it may, the bottom line is we need sources that specifically call these people "tax resisters". I'm going to go ahead and remove the category from those without such a source, especially those whose only indication of tax resistance is appearing in this ad.   Will Beback  talk  00:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Not sure how you can justify that standard. Seems like if they clearly and by their own formal declaration fall under the definition of a tax resister that you quoted, there's no good reason to find some third-party that has come to the same conclusion that anyone could come to. You don't refrain from putting someone in the "living persons" category until you can find a reliable source that explicitly calls them a "living person," you just conclude from the fact that they're not dead that they belong in the category. I know that on Wikipedia there's always a policy that one can call on to defend any position one cares to take, but really! —Moorlock (talk) 01:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

If a person is quoted as saying "I'm going to kill John Doe" that would not be sufficient to add them to the murderers category. Failure to pay taxes is a crime and we can't say that people have done that without clear evidence. If you think there's sufficient reason to create a category like "people who have complained about paying taxes" or "people who have said they won't pay their taxes", then it might fit some of these people. There'd still be the issue of using a primary source for most of them however. Since you are contesting this, I'll start a thread at WP:BLPN to see what others think.   Will Beback  talk  01:30, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

If it's the seeming-to-accuse-people-of-crime-without-sufficient-evidence angle that's worrying you, not all methods of tax resistance are crimes; saying that someone is a tax resister is not equivalent to saying they are a criminal. As for the primary source issue, I gotta say that it sounds pretty pedantic to me to say that it's wiki-wrong to say "so and so signed this petition that appeared in the newspaper on such-and-such a day" unless you can also say "and the New York Times mentioned their name in particular when they reported about the petition." The latter cite doesn't actually add anything to the reliability and verifiability of the fact (though it may say something about its notability), but only satisfies a legalistic reading of the primary-sources Wikipolicy. —Moorlock (talk) 01:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

It is a crime to refuse to pay taxes but it is not a crime to say that one is going to refuse. The category points to the article, and the article only talks about refusing, not just pledging to refuse. Anyway, I've posted a thread at WP:BLPN#Writers and Editors War Tax Protest. I've mentioned some of your concerns, but I'm sure you'll want to give your side too.   Will Beback  talk  01:50, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

FWIW, I see in a biography of Philip K. Dick that he did refuse to pay and suffered for it.[4]   Will Beback  talk  02:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

OK, the thread at BLPN has been running for about almost a week, and I don't expect further input. Both of the responders have basically agreed with my position. I believe the list at History of tax resistance#Vietnam War, 1968–72 is fine, so long as it simply says that they singed the pledge. Biographies for which there is a secondary source discussing their pledge may keep the mention. That would include Dick, Gloria Steinem, and any others we can find. Only those people who are known to have actually refused to pay their tax bill when presented, such as Dick, should be included in the category. The simplest way to proceed would be to remove the mention and category from all except those articles, and add them back as additional sources are found. Does that sound right?   Will Beback  talk  09:19, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

My feelings on the matter haven't changed. I'm not much of a Wikipedia policy nerd so I don't know to what extent a 3-1 vote on BLPN counts as Official Wikipedia Consensus or just the opinions of two people who follow BLPN and decided to pipe up. I'm willing to entertain the idea that there ought maybe to be some distinct tally for the signers of the petition other than just putting the signers in the "tax resisters" category -- maybe some other list-format (perhaps you could recommend one) or maybe the pledge itself deserves a page. But removing the mention of the pledge from the articles themselves seems overkill. The pledge was a milestone in anti-war activism of the time -- not just another anti-war petition, but a pledge to personally refuse to submit to government demands -- and the appearance of so many prominent names on the list made it both a signal of the increasing radicalism of people of letters and also, if you were asked to have your name appear, a signal of your perceived prominence (and political slant) in the writing community at the time. —Moorlock (talk) 15:38, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

The problem is that we're working mostly from a primary source. I encourage you to write an article on the pledge. That would be an opportunity to find more secondary sources. Meantime, I'm going to go ahead and remove the material and category as described above. Feel free to re-add them where merited by secondary sources which discuss the individuals signatories or their actual failure to pay taxes.   Will Beback  talk  22:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Seeing no further comment, I'll proceed with undoing your edits, though it'd really be better if you'd undo them yourself. I don't mean to discourage you from making edits in compliance with WP policies (whatever those are today), but I do think we need to be very careful about what we add to biographies.   Will Beback  talk  08:30, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:NuwaubianBeginning.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Man from planet rizq.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nuwaubu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuwaubu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 01:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuwaubu. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 01:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

• Sorry for the double notification--I see now that you created the original redirect. Drmies (talk) 01:35, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
• Hey Moorlock, I saw your note at the AfD, but since the article Nuwaupian is substantially different (not in quality, though) I have started a merge discussion at Talk:Nuwaubianism#Another_merge:_Nuwaupian. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:45, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Be nice if you could forward the permissions note you clearly obtained to the OTRS permissions queue(see WP:COPYREQ) to avoid ambiguity :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

In view of your contributions at Nuwaubian Nation,[5] and that Yamassee native americans redirects there, please consider commenting at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Yamassee/Yamassee native americans. Thanks. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 04:48, 5 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.

• Fill out the survey with your username and an email address where your sign-up information can be sent.
• If you need assistance, ask User:Ocaasi.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Credo article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Credo pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Credo accounts/Citations.
• Credo would love to hear feedback at WP:Credo accounts/Experiences
• Show off your Credo access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Credo_userbox}} on your userpage
• If you decide you no longer can or want to make use of your account, donate it back by adding your name here

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.

• If you didn't receive an email, or didn't fill out the survey, please email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com
• If you tried out Credo and no longer want access, email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com

If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:36, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:10, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of tax resistance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Provinces (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Lucky duckies, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Lucky duckies" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 01:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of tax resistance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isle of Pines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on File:PassionDwightYork.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redsky89 (talk) 20:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 16:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

I assume you mean well, but please read WP:REFSPAM and make sure your multiple recent additions of reference to the 99 Tactics of Successful Tax Resistance Campaigns, ISBN 978-1490572741, don't run afoul of it. Not all of them have been useful or needed. Thank you. Novaseminary (talk) 01:23, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Lodin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. Tagged for notability since 2009. No indication of notability Doesn't look like a merge into Ossian will work.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~KvnG 02:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hey Moorlock, I sent you an email about access to WP:BNA about two weeks ago, with instructions on how to register for access. Please follow the instructions in the email, Sadads (talk) 16:22, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the note... the email must have gotten caught in my spam filter. Moorlock (talk) 16:25, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Glad that you found it :) Sadads (talk) 17:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tax riot, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.myetymology.com/encyclopedia/Riot_anti-public_prosecutor.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:12, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peacemakers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karl Meyer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Johnson Family has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article that sounds more like a short start to a essay

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 23:57, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Moorlock,

You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Newspapers.com through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update, to remind you about that access:

• Please make sure that you can still log in to your Newspapers.com account. If you are having trouble let me know.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, to include citations with links on Wikipedia. Links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. Also, keep in mind that part of Newspapers.com is open access via the clipping function. Clippings allow you to identify particular articles, extract them from the original full sheet newspaper, and share them through unique URLs. Wikipedia users who click on a clipping link in your citation list will be able to access that particular article, and the full page of the paper if they come from the clipping, without needing to subscribe to Newspapers.com. For more information about how to use clippings, see http://www.newspapers.com/basics/#h-clips .
• Do you write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let me know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. Your input will help us to facilitate this particular partnership, and to discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you,

Wikipedia Library Newspapers.com account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 18:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Arcadi Oliveres has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Crispulop (talk) 18:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of historical acts of tax resistance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page São Martinho. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have removed most of your addition regarding Jews in Vichy France, 1944 to the above article, as it appears to have been copied directly from https://sniggle.net/TPL/index5.php?entry=26May15, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I may have made a mistake. — Diannaa (talk) 01:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

This edit was a problem. You reverted my edit, but actually added additional content. It was confusing. The fact that it was not explained via an edit summary was also a problem. Thank you for your edit, but please take more care in your edits and in communicating with other editors. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Milkers. Since you had some involvement with the Milkers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 02:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TR icon.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:40, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TR icon s.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:40, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Leo Volpe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Bio of non notable individual. I can’t see the ref cited but the only other source I can find is a blog.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 05:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Francesco Piccolomini (philosopher), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. From AnUnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 22:27, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
13,194		Nineteen Eighty-Four (talk)	Add sources
6		Northern California War Tax Resistance (talk)	Add sources
13		Tancament de caixes (talk)	Add sources
12		Chaeremon of Alexandria (talk)	Add sources
340		Ancient literature (talk)	Add sources
925		Blind men and an elephant (talk)	Add sources
5		Cory Morgan (blogger) (talk)	Cleanup
255		Emmanuel Levinas (talk)	Cleanup
6		Edwin Etieyibo (talk)	Cleanup
8		Rappenkrieg (Basel) (talk)	Expand
9,819		South Korea (talk)	Expand
12		ICAD Inc. (talk)	Expand
87		Timeline of diving technology (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
9		Angelets (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
30		The Education of a Christian Prince (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
32		Catholic lay organisations (talk)	Merge
214		Continuum fallacy (talk)	Merge
1,072		Sign language (talk)	Merge
17		Quantifier shift (talk)	Wikify
3		Eroseanna Robinson (talk)	Wikify
179		Ethics in religion (talk)	Wikify
2		Roman Darowski (talk)	Orphan
13		Dutch philosophy (talk)	Orphan
9		Srilatha Batliwala (talk)	Orphan
76		Commonwealth Fusion Systems (talk)	Stub
9		Thrasymachus of Corinth (talk)	Stub
2		Ascanio I Piccolomini (talk)	Stub
57		Davion Taylor (talk)	Stub
3		Johann Oldendorp (talk)	Stub
2		Antonio Piccolomini (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, John A. Collins (abolitionist), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 22:19, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Honesty

added links pointing to Reliability and Candor

Fairness

added a link pointing to Merit

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Ambition (character trait) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a bit of not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and a bit of WP:SYNTH, as the Julius Caesar portion is pure interpretation of the source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cleanliness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Lunes de Aguas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 1keyhole (talk) 03:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Lunes de Aguas. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and needs more categories. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Economic secession is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economic secession until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grnrchst (talk) 16:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicomachean Ethics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peccadillo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Your edit to Politics (Aristotle) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. See the Ithenticate report at CopyPatrol — Diannaa (talk) 18:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

See my addition on your talk page for my answer to this, and why those edits should be unobjectionable. Moorlock (talk) 18:59, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Replied there — Diannaa (talk) 19:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

You are my hero for finishing that page SpicyMemes123 (talk) 03:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Thomas Sims, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

thanks for your editing.

The wiki EMDR article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_movement_desensitization_and_reprocessing has been mired in a long-running battle about the harm of describing this therapy, that many people have empirically found very helpful for resolving psychological trauma, as a pseudoscience.

Maybe very credible, wise and senior editors could resolve; please could you go there and give a view? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.66.63.86 (talk) 03:48, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Moorlock, you have just made five requests for article copyedits, three more than the maximum. As it says on the requests page, You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Please decide which of these two requests are most important, and withdraw the others. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:31, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Moorlock, I removed without change three of the tags you put into Prussian virtues because I don't see them as necessary.

In the sentence In such a heterogeneous state, the ideas of Pietism, which eventually took on the character of a "Prussian state religion", proved to be a valuable area of commonality, the commonality value is to those living in 'such a heterogeneous state'. Seems straightforward.

About the reference to the cardinal virtues – it's common for e.g. 10 things to spring from 2, so I don't think the phrasing suggests that there were only the four virtues. The many other virtues arose from the four basic ones.

And as to "To be Prussian / Etre Prussien" – both the English and French are complete sentences.

Regards, GHStPaulMN (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Courage, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

I’ve apparently decided that only copy editing this one isn’t good enough for me. I’m bored, it’s sweltering here, and I enjoy the concept, so I’m going to try to take this to GA. I’ve made some major edits, and plan to rewrite the neurobiology section into prose over the weekend. Take a look and see if you want me to mark the copy-edit request as done so you can request another. Regardless what you decide I’m going to, at minimum, continue tracking down and improving the citations, and rewrite that section. ~ Argenti Aertheri^(Chat?) 05:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Faith, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Innocence, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:01, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Intellectual courage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden mean.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect Baa Baa has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 5 § Baa Baa until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Innocence, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello. On the article "Discipline", you have seemed to help me copy edit the article by using ChatGPT (see here). I'm not sure if that's allowed on Wikipedia, so message me back if I got anything wrong. Thanks, Tarantula^TM (speak with me) (my legacy) 17:21, 20 August 2023 (UTC).Reply

@TrademarkedTarantula — here is the wikipedia policy on the use of LLMs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Large_language_models

FYI, here's a prompt I've been using. I'm not a very sophisticated user, but this seems to be giving decent results —Moorlock (talk) 18:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC) Please edit the following paragraph. Preserve all of the information that the paragraph was intended to impart. But change the wording as necessary to express that information in clear, concise, and correct English such as would be appropriate for a general-audience Wikipedia page. Use short, declarative, active-voice sentences where possible. Reword jargon or overly-academic writing into more commonplace English if you can do so without losing precision. Do not rewrite quotations embedded in the paragraph.Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Psychological resilience, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Moorlock. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lunes de Aguas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Moorlock. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lunes de Aguas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I tried my best to resolve the issues like jargon or vaugue statements that you pointed out in your edits https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Modafinil&diff=1147215922&oldid=1146018498 on Modafinil. Can you please review my edits and the edits by other people that aimed to resolve your observation, and let me know whether all your issues that you've raised are properly addressed? --Maxim Masiutin (talk) 16:55, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Russian tax resisters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Factology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't find sources to add to show this is a notable concept.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply