Olef641

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to John Barrymore has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: John Barrymore was changed by Olef641 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962816 on 2014-04-05T04:42:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:43, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Olef641, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ... however late, sorry about that. Please sign your posts on talk pages, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

There is no consensus to include an IB on the Olivier talk page, so please do nor try and force one on there just because it may be your personal preference. There is a talk page thread on the matter (to which you have already contributed), so if you wish to join in further, that is the place to deal with the matter, not through edit warring. - SchroCat (talk) 06:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

• There is an established consensus for no info box to be included on the Laurence Olivier article, as SchroCat has explained to you above. Please stop re-adding unless you are able to overturn the consensus. Thanks. SagaciousPhil - Chat 07:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

• Re your edit summary "This I the ONLY article about a person I have EVER visited on Wikipedia in all the years I have been using it that has no infobox." If that is the case then you have been unlucky. There are many, many articles which do not hold an IB, many of them are of FA or GA standard. I suggest you do not edit war furthert to your own personal opinion, but use the talk page instead. - SchroCat (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Paris Themmen, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 02:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Olef641, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to The Famous Ferguson Case has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Win Ben Stein's Money, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 5. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Lilith page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Louie Anderson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Funny You Should Ask (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Anabaptism does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited That Certain Woman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Phillips (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rockville Stone Chapel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockville Stone Chapel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stainless Steel Stalinism (talk) 11:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

≈== Block appeal ==

 

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olef641 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't understand what has happened. I have been a responsible Wikipedia user for a long time, both under this ID and my previous one (which I accidentally changed to the current one). Can you tell me why I was blocked? In any case, please unblock my access. Thank you.

Decline reason:

This account is not directly blocked. That's good news, it probably means the block isn't targeted at you. If you've been using a proxy or a vpn, please disable it and try again in 24 hours. If not, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to edit. This will allow us to find the block affecting you. Yamla (talk) 21:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Watson family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boys Town.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madlyn Rhue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Route 66.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Posse from Hell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Wills.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have removed your addition of a date of birth to Jo Ann Pflug. Unfortunately, IMDb is not a reliable source for use in Wikipedia articles. You might want to look at WP:IMDB and WP:USERGENERATED for comments about user-generated sites and names of some other sites that are in this category. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Star-Spangled Banner (flag). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 05:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

One lousy reversion and I'm engaged in an edit war?!?! olef641 (talk) 08:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Goodbye to Berlin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hi Olef641! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply