Helper201

Hello. The accounts submitted to the EC actually have this membership figure on them. There used to be a citation on the page showing this but it has since been removed - apparently the citation isn't open to the general public yet, but it should be shortly (it's actually over-due but the snap general election has slowed down the electoral commission some what). It's a bit of a waste of time to edit the graph only to change it back in a week or two - especially when I know the information to be valid.

The mention of the body does not say that she is dead. But it does connect to her late father’s wish to give her a proper Christian burial. If you are willing to accept that, pls undo previous edit. If not, pls mention in the Talk.

Dear, I have noticed that you edited Awami League page back to original one and I'm delighted that you have done that. Unfortunately, users like Vif12vf|,Nzs9|, and ShrewMoon| take down good edits. I strongly advice you to monitor, Awami League page. It is being vandalized by users that are putting on false information and arguing about topics that they do not understand.2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:5A4:16B3:2839:64DB (talk) 18:47 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Nzs9|, is keeping on editing on Awami league page. He does it and then even has it undone. I would advice to monitor him and report him so he gets a ban from editing on Awami league page.2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:5A4:16B3:2839:64DB (talk) 14:27 20 March 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:D4B6:874C:1C1F:7A6 (talk)

Hello, i saw you put 27 RUK councillors, this is outright false, on the source it says 28, and a further one via this email i got sent Yes, Sean Hind was elected last Thursday in the by-election for the Heanor East ward of Heanor & Loscoe Town Council. The full result is available on our website https://info.ambervalley.gov.uk/docarc/docviewer.aspx?docguid=b028c610d7484292a40d49f9cb207002 Update the page. Spookybunny8 (talk) 10:16, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Spookybunny8 this got mixed up in a prior revert. Regardless it said 29 the witch was Wong. I've now corrected it to 28. Helper201 (talk) 15:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Its 28+1, the one coming from the above link, this depends on what locak government goes down to, County? District? Town? Parish? Spookybunny8 (talk) 02:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Spookybunny8 This discussion is better suited to the article's talk page. Please discuss the matter there so others can take part. Helper201 (talk) 15:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

listen mate reform h=now have 29 local councillors link here to prove it. https://www.clactonandfrintongazette.co.uk/news/24653573.former-frinton-mayor-leaves-tendring-first-join-reform-uk/

also Reform uk has changed their slogan to Family, Community, Country. this was confirmed at the reform uk party conference on the 20th September 2024 if you watch the video you will see the slogan in the back ground of all speakers at the conference. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f37kbgiw-M0

they also have 90 thousand paid members now it was confirmed by the official social media page of the party this is from a real source.

JY-LIVE Just cite your claims using a reliable third party source. You didn't, that's why it was reverted. You changed information to what the sources provided on Reform UK's Wikipedia page did not say. Helper201 (talk) 02:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I saw you reverted an edit which I had made to the Bulgarian 2024 Election Campaign citing the WP:ELNO policy (which was valid). However, I had sine changed the table to exclude all external links, except to the official campaign websites of the parties. Instead, what had been done is adding the slogans of the parties without the websites, and with a reference from the parties leadership/social media which generally does NOT violate wikipedia policy, especially as pertains to political campaigns. It seems you have decided to once again remove all the slogans which had been added. In fact, it seems you even removed parts which had the official campaign websites of the parties added. Now, it can be argued that these party websites are a violation of WP:ELNO in which case the whole section should be reworked, however your arbitrary editting (which seems to have no concern for the actual content of the article or the work that editors have put in to researching the subject) is undermining any progress that can be made. Bulpoliticsedit (talk) 12:11, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bulpoliticsedit We should keep to only including what reliable sources state and not use social media. If I removed anything stated by official website then that was a mistake. Helper201 (talk) 23:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Specifically, "As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body." This is why you are getting reverted by multiple editors. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Trainsandotherthings my apologies, I didn't see that these were already linked in the main text. Helper201 (talk) 10:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi.

I've re-removed the lines mentioning their town or parish level councillors from the article's lead. While it made sense and was notable enough for inclusion in the lead section (and by notable, I'm not referring to the GNG but rather the contents of the article as a whole) when that was their highest level of representation, the fact they now have a councillor elected to a principal authority effectively renders what made the mention of their town/parish councillors as justifiable to mention in the lead moot.

Rambling Rambler (talk) 19:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

It's still notable in terms of the party's overall representation, given how limited it is. Helper201 (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

It's suitable for inclusion within the article, but putting parish and town council seats in the lead when they have higher levels of representation is highly unusual, as the lead is meant to summarise the most important points. Now they have any amount of principal authority representation, the parish/town level is now not the most important level to summarise, similar to how we don't detail the number of councillors in the lead for parties with MPs. Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply