HariSinghw

Thanks for creating Israna, HariSinghw!

Wikipedia editor Usernamekiran just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi, I removed the list of nearby villages from the article. It is not appropriate. Nearby big city, and one or two important villages or cities can be added. Thanks again for creating the article. :-)

To reply, leave a comment on Usernamekiran's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

—usernamekiran(talk) 21:55, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, HariSinghw. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Manoj Kumar Sinha (Jurist), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Manoj Kumar Sinha (Jurist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ili.ac.in/faculty.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. /wiae /tlk 19:16, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Manoj Kumar Sinha (Jurist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shrikanthv (talk) 09:22, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sushil Yadav".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "R. K. Mudgil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 13:59, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joginder Mor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joginder Mor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —usernamekiran(talk) 20:26, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 20:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Royal CorpTravel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:54, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "R. K. Mudgil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, HariSinghw,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Society for Sustainable Agriculture and Resource Management should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society for Sustainable Agriculture and Resource Management .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, HariSinghw,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether International Foundation for Sustainable Development in Africa and Asia should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Foundation for Sustainable Development in Africa and Asia .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:48, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Boleyn. HariSinghw, thanks for creating Kahni, Rohtak!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has no reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 07:43, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arthur Riedacker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 10:47, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Sri Baba Mast Nath Ayurvedic & Sanskrit Sikshan Sansthan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DannyS712 (talk) 04:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Jagannath Gupta Memorial Education Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Muhandes (talk) 12:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jagannath Gupta Memorial Education Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagannath Gupta Memorial Education Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Muhandes (talk) 06:36, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Mandhan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:01, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, HariSinghw. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 14:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sri Baba Mast Nath Ayurvedic & Sanskrit Sikshan Sansthan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mandhan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mandhan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 13:44, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Centre for United Nations Constitutional Research requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://acuns.org/center-for-united-nations-constitutional-research-cuncr/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Kshitij Adhlakha, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 17:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Eugenia Almand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't pass any of the criteria for WP:NSCHOLAR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:06, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Gautam Goswami, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 23:10, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on S. K. Gakhar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - FitIndia ^{Talk Admin on Commons} 15:10, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HariSinghw, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

- FitIndia ^{Talk Admin on Commons} 16:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Keshavan Madhava Menon v. The State of Bombay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Mahant Totanath, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajesh Kumar Malik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Kumar Malik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RationalPuff (talk) 09:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vageshwari Deswal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vageshwari Deswal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RationalPuff (talk) 13:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kshitij Adhlakha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Rajesh Duggal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable IPS. His wife is an elected politician but nothing notable about his own self. News is mostly about his transfer by Election Comission.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:44, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abhimanyu Rao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhimanyu Rao until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R. K. Mittal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. K. Mittal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Ramesh Chander Bidhan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable IAS officer. No other news apart from transfers of him along with several others. Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajesh Duggal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Duggal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:39, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Keshavan Madhava Menon v. The State of Bombay, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 15:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Haryana police officers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Mandeep Kaur Sidhu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 11:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I can't help noticing that your English is extremely poor, and yet you haven't made any edits on the Wikipedia in your native language, which I take to be Punjabi. Perhaps you would have more success there. Deb (talk) 11:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I agree but pages may be improved and deletion is not a prompt solution you provided to my hard work. You must encourage. Please undo your last edit. HariSinghw (talk) 11:51, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hallo, Thank you for creating Tangra, Punjab. When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Tangra ), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 12:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gautam Goswami, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Rohtash Yadav has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No signs of sufficient notability found per WP:BIO or WP:GNG, an ordinary radiologist in India

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello HariSinghw. You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access to the channel.

An article you recently created, Indian Journal of Criminology, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Randykitty (talk) 21:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manish Yadav is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manish Yadav until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GermanKity (talk) 05:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Indian Journal of Criminology (IJC), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Randykitty (talk) 16:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dear Sir, As you know that it meets the notability guidelines and almost 50 years old Journal. The article may also be improved by the world wikipedians and visitors of the page. HariSinghw (talk) 16:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

• Hi, please have a look at WP:JWG and perhaps also at some of the better academic journal articles (e.g., Genes, Brain and Behavior). At this point, your draft is deficient and not ready for main article space. Being 50 years old is not a guarantee for notability. Your draft does not list any selective indices that include the journal or any reliable sources that are independent of the subject (see WP:NJournals), so for the moment notability has not been shown. Please do not move it to article space again without it going through review as described above. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 17:13, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks HariSinghw (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gautam Goswami".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi thanks for creating new articles on this topic. It looks like there is only a couple of sentences in each one, and in one case, a single source. It is unlikely that the articles will survive in this form and my suggestion is that you create a single article on date palm farming in India, with paragraphs about each state. There is certainly enough material for an article about the whole country, which is more useful to the reader anyway than having to navigate between a number of stub articles. Mccapra (talk) 08:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for guidance and I will improve these articles. I love to be honest (talk) 08:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Tangra, Punjab, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 10:16, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sagar Dhankhar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagar Dhankhar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Johnnie Bob (talk) 13:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.hsamb.org.in/about-us. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EN-Jungwon 17:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on District Jail, Jhajjar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Broken external links, single citation is a PDF of a photocopy and does not qualify as a source, article is uninformative, shows no signs of WP:GNG at all, and the remaining information is uncited.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Tautomers_{(T C)} 07:16, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

It is being improved with more references and information. I love to be honest (talk) 08:03, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello HariSinghw,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Faculty of Law, Maharshi Dayanand University for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 12:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article District Jail, Jhajjar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/District Jail, Jhajjar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--Tautomers_{(T C)} 19:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. You may find a direct link to this here: Troublesome Unlearning Editor --Tautomers_{(T C)} 21:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Additionally, please review WP:Competence is required as a primer for why I created this ANI, and to be clear I am assuming good faith. --Tautomers_{(T C)} 02:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

The Administrators' comments at the ANI trended toward your having shown some competence in creating articles, but need to improve quality. Perhaps return to stub articles you have created, to improve those, or seek out existing stub articles on topics that interest you and improve those. My opinion is that you are often creating very weak articles without going though AfC, and this is of no benefit to Wikipedia. Instead, all it does is waste the time of other editors who feel obligated to start a deletion process. Specific examples of articles that in my opinion should not have created, or need work to become articles useful to viewers:

• District Jail, Jhajjar
• District Jail, Rohtak
• District Jail, Bhiwani
• District Jail, Rohtak
• Central Prison, Ambala content, but only one ref
• Sojat Bar Association
• Date palm farming in Gujarat
• Date palm farming in Rajasthan
• Rohini Bar Association
• Hisar Bar Association
• Karontha
• Lakhan Majra
• Sagar Dhankhar at AfD
• Chhagan Singh Rajpurohit

You also have a habit of creating minimal content drafts, and then doing no further work, so that in time these fallow drafts need to be deleted. Examples of recent very short drafts:

• Draft:Sports in Haryana
• Draft:Hisar-Jakhal line
• Draft:Incarceration in India
• Draft:Rajasthan Sociological Association
• Draft:Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board

Please consider slowing down on quantity and focusing on quality. Copying Tautomers who had submitted the ANI. David notMD (talk) 10:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Great advice David notMD, and thanks for outlining this. I would ask that HariSingw please take some time over the next few days to try and improve the articles listed here. If you can't move them to draft space or pose them to be deleted yourself. Since you have more intimate knowledge of these places and topics, and are local to the area you're in you are one the most equipt people to create and triage if they are WP:GNG worthy when creating them. I'll circle back later this week and see if they've been spruced up. --Tautomers_{(T C)} 20:18, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Maharshi Dayanand University indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Template:List of prisons in Rajasthan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of prisons in Rajasthan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of prisons in Rajasthan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Indian Society of Criminology, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:17, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bar associations of Haryana, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bar associations of Haryana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

sir in our odisha Lord Bisnu ji's Kalyug incarnation Lord Jagannath is's panchaskha is very famous, out of those 5 ...Achyutanand Das is Yadav caste... who had written predictions as to how Kaliyug would end, the name of that Purana is Malika Purana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . And he has written a lot of puranas …it would be nice if you write about him on yadav dynasty Wikipedia....thank you..Jay Jagannath AVINASH MANIA (talk) 12:10, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

You are requested to provide more details of these articles. I love to be honest (talk) 14:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

There is already a page name Achyutananda. I love to be honest (talk) 14:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manish Gupta (chancellor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manish Gupta (chancellor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

XOR'easter (talk) 19:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Bar Associations of Haryana indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Sumer Singh Yadav, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 06:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

You are creating biographical articles regarding which I suspect you have a conflict of interest You are the person who formerly edited here as Austereraj (talk · contribs) & numerous socks, aren't you? It won't impress your peers if you are blocked yet again, surely? - Sitush (talk) 18:39, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Crime in Haryana, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi @HariSinghw:,

Have proposed a New Tag & Assess for WikiProject India here. Do let us know your view. :) Happy editting! AshLin (talk) 04:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Zarpur Pali railway station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:07, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, HariSinghw

Thank you for creating Salhawas tehsil.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Add population information from censusindia.gov.in/pca/Searchdata.aspx. Also rewrite the lead sentence to look more like other tehsil articles.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rohtas Kanwar Yadav, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shubhra Sanyal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Indian Journal of Criminology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mahant Totanath".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Keshavan Madhava Menon v. The State of Bombay, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tangra, Punjab, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:S. K. Gakhar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rajasthan Sociological Association, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sports in Haryana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indian Journal of Criminology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:23, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Incarceration in India, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Indian Society of Criminology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indian Society of Criminology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:31, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sumer Singh Yadav, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, List of villages in Jhajjar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:09, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Salhawas tehsil, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:10, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Sita Ram Vyas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable biography. Not a single source used covers the subject in-depth and only has passing mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article K. M. Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable BLP. Article presents nothing of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

You have continued to create articles without improving them by adding adequate sourcing or expanding them. If you're going to create an article, please read Wikipedia:Notability on how to better improve them, but also think if the article you are creating is deserving of one. Like most, I'm tired of having to nominate your articles for deletion for failing to do this basic task. Please take this as a helpful pointer. If you keep creating them without improving them and just for the purpose of creating, you are most likely going to be subject to another ANI which is what we should try to avoid. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dear Sir, I will update as per your instructions. I love to be honest (talk) 11:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Your edit to V. K. Garg has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article K. M. Singh Committee Report on Civil Defense has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable subject. No reliable or adequate sources regarding the subject. Fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Crime in Haryana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zarpur Pali railway station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on List of prisons in Andhra Pradesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://ncrb.gov.in/sites/default/files/Executive-Summary-2019.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

An article you recently created, Odhan, Sirsa, is not suitable as written to remain published. I've moved your draft to Draftspace where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's General Notability Guideline and ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 09:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Crime in Haryana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:07, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zarpur Pali railway station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Jai Rup Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Malikul Mout (talk) 17:06, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, HariSinghw

Thank you for creating Odhan, Sirsa.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The article's title is Odhan, but the population figures seem to be from a town called Dhamana. Search for the village's name in https://censusindia.gov.in/pca/Searchdata.aspx and use that as a ref for the population figures

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:11, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hisar-Jakhal line, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Keshavan Madhava Menon v. The State of Bombay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:27, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Jai Rup Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Lakhan Majra railway station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 15:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Bathinda-Rohtak line has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of importance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 15:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Bhartiya Shikshan Mandal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello HariSinghw,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bhartiya Shikshan Mandal for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of villages in Jhajjar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, HariSinghw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Salhawas tehsil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, HariSinghw

Thank you for creating Mithri, Sirsa.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, HariSinghw

Thank you for creating List of law schools in Punjab.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, HariSinghw

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meena, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Bathinda-Rohtak line, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meena}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– Meena • 22:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Meena This page was also nominated for deletion but it was not deleted because of its notable value and about 42 railway stations are there.I love to be honest (talk) I love to be honest (talk) 10:09, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, HariSinghw, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Meena, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Bathinda-Rohtak line, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bathinda-Rohtak line.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meena}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– Meena • 10:15, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bathinda-Rohtak line, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bathinda-Rohtak line until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of villages in Jhajjar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:01, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Salhawas tehsil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I noticed you removed the tags on Saman Tabrez Ansari in this edit. The only reason you gave is that the edits were made by an anonymous user. I'm not the user who made that edit, but anonymous users have just as every right to edit as logged in users. This is not a valid reason to undo someone's edits. Bennv123 (talk) 17:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hi HariSinghw! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. User4edits (talk) 04:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Jai Jai Wanti railway station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 18:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raj Kumar Yadav (academic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raj Kumar Yadav (academic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

User4edits (talk) 03:58, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jai Rup Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jai Rup Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KSAWikipedian (talk) 02:03, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

He has worked as vice chancellor of two universities in India.I love to be honest (talk) 02:08, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

To the best of my understand that is not enough to establish notability, I am mistaken please point out the policy or consensus and I will gladly revisit my nomination and may even withdraw it. KSAWikipedian (talk) 02:13, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@KSAWikipedian Dear Sir, you must check guidelines before doing such destructive things, pls check even a Dean of the University deserves page, OMG. you are using rights without having knowledge of the same. I Apologise if you feel offended. Do whatever you like.I love to be honest (talk) 02:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I am by no means perfect. If you have reference to policy or consensus that vice chancellors of a university are inherently notable, please do share with me an educate me. Thanks. KSAWikipedian (talk) 02:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nishtha Jaswal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nishtha Jaswal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KSAWikipedian (talk) 02:08, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@KSAWikipedian She is vice chancellor of National Law University. what are you doing man.I love to be honest (talk) 02:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tarun Arora (academic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarun Arora (academic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KSAWikipedian (talk) 02:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Buta Singh Sidhu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buta Singh Sidhu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KSAWikipedian (talk) 02:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wait I send you guidelines. Pls don't delete all pages. I have spent lot of time in creating articles.I love to be honest (talk) 02:24, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@KSAWikipedian He is also Vice chancellor. I love to be honest (talk) 02:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please do send the guideline that show that being a vice chancellor is enough to establish notability. If such a policy or consensus is found, I will revisit all my nominations and see if I have other reason to keep the WP:AFD nomination, if not, I will withdraw my nominations. KSAWikipedian (talk) 02:29, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I reviewed all criteria again Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#Specific_criteria_notes particularly number 6. If Vice-chancellor is indeed the highest office in India then you can argue whether or not these are "major academic institutions," I still think these article should be deleted, but you can make your case in the WP:AFDs. Nothing personal dude, just doing what I think is right, including helping you defend yourself. KSAWikipedian (talk) 03:29, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes Sir Vice Chancellor of University and Dean of a school is highest academic position in India. I love to be honest (talk) 12:13, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S. P. Singh (jurist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. P. Singh (jurist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KSAWikipedian (talk) 02:31, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R. K. Mittal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. K. Mittal (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KSAWikipedian (talk) 02:35, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vageshwari Deswal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vageshwari Deswal (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KSAWikipedian (talk) 03:05, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Kila Zafargarh railway station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:35, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! KSAWikipedian (talk) 16:42, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, HariSinghw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sumer Singh Yadav".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! KSAWikipedian (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, HariSinghw,

I'm not sure why you received this notification but this was not a valid speedy deletion tagging and the draft page has been restored. Sorry for the unecessary notification. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, HariSinghw. Please only cast one boldfaced !vote per AfD. You've attempted to double-!vote on two occasions now, at at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Kumar Malik last year and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raj Kumar Yadav (academic) just now.

Furthermore, can I ask, do you know Mamtakuhu20 outside of Wikipedia? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 20:05, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, HariSinghw. Can you please answer this question before you continue editing? Thanks. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 23:51, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Tamzin: He has continued to edit made 2 edits in the last week. Just thought I would bring it to your attention and leave further action or inaction to your discretion. KSAWikipedian (talk) 21:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply