Khenamothara

Great work, really spiffs up the article! MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. In The Dreamer (Etta James album), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page All The Way (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback!

We have created a brief survey intended to help us understand the experiences and impressions of veteran editors who have participated on the Teahouse. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages some time during the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 01:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

 

Hello, Khenamothara. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Worm^TT(talk) 17:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

A little more there. Worm^TT(talk) 17:25, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Council.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on File:Council.jpg|this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Nazer and Manzur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Pouyakhani, thanks for creating Pari Zanganeh!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. To avoid deletion, please provide reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

 

The article Pari Zanganeh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References fail to meet criteria for WP:MUSICBIO in number, depth, and reliability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:59, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Soheil Zarrin Kelk, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello Pouyakhani. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Soheil Zarrin Kelk.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Soheil Zarrin Kelk}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! Thanks for joining Wikipedia Asian Month. Here is some information about participating in the event:

1. Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
2. Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
3. Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
4. If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
5. Wikipedia Asian Month is also held in other language Wikipedia and count independently. Check for other language editions.
6. If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes,--AddisWang (talk) 16:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello Pouyakhani,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Imamzadeh Yahya for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello Pouyakhani,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hovhannes Abkarian for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pahlavi family tree, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ali Reza Pahlavi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Hadavand tribe, from its old location at User:Pouyakhani/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 19:23, 3 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

No consensus whatsover has been reached regarding those articles. You haven't even written anything on the talk page of the articles. So please stop redirecting them. --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi I’m a new page reviewer and I’m looking at this article you created a while ago. As far as I can see, the sources you have provided don’t support the notability of the book. Do you have sources that discuss the book, rather than the architectural periods described in the book? Thanks. Mccapra (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Mccapra: I actually believe that the page for this book and the pages about the proposed "styles" be speedy deleted or at best be merged in the Iranian architecture. The claims made by this particular book and its so called "styles", are only found in itself; therefore it is not possible to find other reliable sources discussing either the book or the styles. The so-called styles and their "names" have caused some misunderstanding too. For example Azeri style, according to this book is a series of buildings erected in Iran (and greater Iran) during the Ilkhanid and Timurid era and not architecture in Azerbaijan in North western Iran and south Caucaus. I proposed the merger following the merger in Persian Wikipedia. Khenamothara (talk) 21:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

ok thanks. I’ll think about those options. Mccapra (talk) 21:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Noon Khe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Thank you for your contributions. Just a quick clarification. I don't necessarily think a category of Muslim female rulers are uneccessary. But it has the wrong name. "Queen regnant" is not just the name a a woman who rules. Its the term for a queen who rules. But not all female rulers were queens. Some were princesses, duchesses, empresses - or sultans or khatuns. They could have many different titles. "Queen" is a title, so only women who had that title could be placed in such a category.

If you wanted a category to gather all the muslim women who ruled, then the category should have a different name. For example, if it was called "Muslim women rulers", then all Muslim women who ruled could be placed in it: it would not matter if they had the title queen, sultan, khatun - all women rulers could be placed there. But with such a specific name for a category as "Queens regnants", only a small number of Muslim women rulers can be placed there.

So: I don't neccessarily think the category is wrong (although there is not such a category for any other religion, so why should there be for Muslims?) I just think it has the wrong name. So you can write "Category as the wrong name" instead of "apparently uneccessary" in the speedy deletion request if you want, because that would be more correct. Just to clarify the problems with your category! Have a nice day!--Aciram (talk) 13:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Aciram: Hello, thank you for your clarification. As you pointed out, women rulers from other religions have not been categorized this way. Although it took me hours to create this, I now think it is unnecessary to categorize people from such different contexts and backgrounds into one category. Khenamothara (talk) 14:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hadavand tribe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chenar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hadavand tribe, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:07, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Category:Wives of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 09:27, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Varamin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vahram.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply