Karaboom

Fascinated to learn that Beecham won one. Have you any details? Well worth adding to the article, I'd say. Tim Riley 17:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

The details are in the Grammy Awards of 1961 article. I'm just improving the category, not editing the content of the articles themselves, but if you want to write it up, go ahead by all means. Karaboom 19:47, 17 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

That's most interesting. Many thanks. Tim Riley 21:49, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the message you left me. I'm happy you have taken the placement of the editorial templates in the spirit I'm offering them. I, like you, hope somebody with better sources to contribute will come upon the articles and improve them. I also see nothing wrong with building out content in the manner you're doing just as long as we acknowledge the shortcomings of that content as it is at the moment. Happy editing. Erechtheus 00:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Stranger (Hilary Duff song). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 13:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Which one is the real person? The other article will probably need to be redirected or deleted. Spryde 10:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Both are real and different people with different middle names, birth dates, everything. There are reference links. Karaboom 10:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Could you offer your opinion on the discussion on the Ossie Davis Talk Page? Thanks. Nightscream 16:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Gwen Stefani discography. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. 17Drew 22:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated Melanie Castleman, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Castleman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back to Mine: Adam Freeland

Basically, the state of the entire series of Back to Mine, DJ-Kicks, and Late Night Tales is such that if these articles were deleted, all those would be as well. The discussion here may not set any precedent but if these articles are deleted, those will probably be next. Feel free to express your opinion. - McCart42 (talk) 14:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi and thanks for all your contributions to football-related articles. Just a note, we do not link dates anymore. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Aleksandar Radosavljević (midfielder), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreferenced biography of a living person

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ORBuster (talk) 18:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Fabien Debray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 21:03, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Karaboom! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 691 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Marian Palát - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. George Adams (basketball) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Eric Chenowith - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Rafael Bracali - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Alonso Ferreira de Matos - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Cléber Monteiro de Oliveira - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

This user may have left Wikipedia. Karaboom has not edited Wikipedia since since July 27, 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Šarūnas Stančaitis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Šarūnas Stančaitis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J Mo 101 (talk) 13:12, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melanie Castleman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Castleman (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John of Reading (talk) 11:13, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Dilaver Zrnanović has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Igor Aksyonov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article contains no references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 09:53, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Yevgeni Alkhimov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article contains no references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 09:58, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Zurab Arziani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article contains no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 10:19, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Valerian Bestayev has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 11:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Daniel Braga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has no refernces

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 14:17, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of FC Tyumen.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:51, 25 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating AMG Sebastiani Basket Rieti, Karaboom!

Wikipedia editor Yoshi24517 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It's a redirect, so nothing needs to be done.

To reply, leave a comment on Yoshi24517's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

 

The article Kendrick Spruel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail notability criteria at WP:ATHLETE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ifnord (talk) 20:58, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Edward J. Hickox has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. MensanDeltiologist (talk) 19:10, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chicken_Lips. Scarpy (talk) 16:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don Anielak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Anielak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

4meter4 (talk) 13:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of FC Dynamo Vologda.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of FC Tyumen.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Elton Lira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article was created in 2008 and there hasn't been any improvement and there's certainly nothing that warrants this person to have an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Carciano has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:35, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply