Excommunicato

 

Welcome to Wikipedia, Excommunicato! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. If you wish to contact me on this page, please use {{Ping|HiLo48}} such that I get notified of your request. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 06:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

I am always trying to be helpful --Eliskuya2 (talk) 21:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph Anton Blatter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Temporal power. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I invite you to comment at Talk:Bhat#Requested move 20 March 2021 with an apology for this mess-up by me (I didn't receive the ping sending notification for the second time, hence I'm writing here to be sure). Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 06:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Very nice work on Alexandre Perregaux. I'm not sure if any of the article came from the French article, but if it did it's important to give a link to the French source, for copyright attribution. I usually go to the history of the French article and then copy the last version. It can be put in any edit comment on ,the En page, or there is a template called Template:Translated page that can be used. In any case, welcome and congrats on the article!--- Possibly (talk) 00:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey! I did take one reference from the French article, thanks for the advice! Excommunicato (talk) 03:14, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bon-Adrien Jeannot de Moncey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moncey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Portuguese conquest of French Guiana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capitulation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2021 Rio de Janeiro shootout

added a link pointing to G1

Dominique Jean Larrey

added a link pointing to Battle of Abukir

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited French Basque Country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Basel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Excommunicato, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Louis-Eugène Cavaignac, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.ohio.edu/chastain/ac/cavaig.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Louis-Eugène Cavaignac and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en wikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Louis-Eugène Cavaignac, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Louis-Eugène Cavaignac. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Louis-Eugène Cavaignac with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Louis-Eugène Cavaignac saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 14:29, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I see by your recent edit summary that you believe removing the citation means that a re-write is not longer necessary. That's not true, because the copyright text is still present in the article. Removing the citation does not remove the copyright violation.— Diannaa (talk) 16:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

The copyrighted website itself took its content from an academic work (cited as Frederick de Luna above Bibliography) that is already being directly used as reference in the article. As you can see, I didn't simply remove but replaced the citations, as the information taken from the copyrighted source is the same as in said work. The same applies to https://www.ohio.edu/chastain/dh/frpres.htm, which was cited only once, with the exception that its information is now sourced by a work from a different author. Excommunicato (talk) 16:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonas Furrer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Federal Council.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

When I say “better quality” I mean that it looks better in the article. And images in the info box look much better when looking towards the text. And an exact date does matter it gives the reader more context and information. If you have two good images one has the exact year and the other has the exact decade you’re going to pick first image. Orson12345 (talk) 22:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please note that the Cato Encyclopedia of Libertarianism has an article on Constant. And Constant has an important role in the development of liberalism. In turn, classical liberalism is a core component of libertarianism. Including Constant in the scope of the WikiProject Libertarianism is entirely proper. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 03:44, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Quid Est Squid (talk) 21:42, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Addis Emmet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cork.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wilfried Martens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Federal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samuel Frisching (II), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Academy of Geneva.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stecklikrieg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey—just a reminder, reverts of edits other than obvious vandalism are definitionally never minor edits, per WP:MINOR. Remsense诉 23:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply