Eruhildo

I don't really understand the edit summary field. What do I do with it? Thanks!

See Help:Edit summary, which discusses it in detail, hope this helps :-) Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 06:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

He is too fast, same answer here :) I remove the helpme tag, if you have further questions don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page or to put the tag back. Happy Editing! -- lucasbfr ^talk 06:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wow, you guys are fast. Thanks for helping out a newbie. --Eruhildo 06:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Eruhildo!

Thank you for joining WikiProject Middle-earth and contributing to improve Tolkien-related articles. We are glad to have you join in the effort!

Here're some good links and subpages related to our WikiProject.

If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to ask on our talk page.

Thank you for your contributions and have fun editing! (In response to your question, to what areas do you feel like you can contribute the most to? Also, if you could participate the discussion going on here as a member, that'd be great. :) Thanks!) —Mirlen 03:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I found the history tab - now I understand why the edit summary is important. --Eruhildo 06:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Viewer dude of Japanese anime (BLOOD+)!???!--Ken Miyagi 00:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Silacoid pic.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Silaciod pic.png. The copy called Image:Silaciod pic.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wow, and here I was wondering what to do with the first image (name was misspelled), but a bot already took care of it for me. How cool is that?! --Eruhildo 02:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please stop redirecting every x-com related creature to the "terror from the deep" list. There were several games in that series, and this is going to take a while to clean up now. i kan reed 18:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm really sorry about that. I made a stupid mistake and then copy and pasted it to a dozen other pages. I've fixed it now. Thanks for pointing it out to me - I never would have caught it otherwise. --Eruhildo 21:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Before starting on trying to make character articles, you have to make sure that you have out-of-universe info to justify a separation from the character list. This is especially concerned with Blood+ since the article page isn't exactly long enough to really justify character articles to conserve space. Saya is an exception since she's the central character in the series, movie, and manga related to the Blood franchise and finding info/expanding on current info can really make a great article. But for Haji and the rest of the characters, there really isn't that much we can do apart from coverage of their roles in the anime and that isn't enough to keep admins/users who would nominate the article for deletion and redirect the content which just causes problems for everyone, especially the people contributing to the article. So for now just concern with improving Saya's article since she's the only character that really has a shot at keeping her independance alive. Fox816 (talk) 04:08, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I didn't know that. Thanks for telling me - it will save me from wasting a lot of time on articles that will get deleted anyway. ^_^ I don't really know what counts as out-of-universe info - is there a policy or guideline on that? I'd like to read up on it. I'm still kind of new here, so I don't know all the rules yet, so to speak.

Also, what about David and Lewis? They were both in the movie and I think David was in one of the manga too. I know there's not enough on them for separate articles, but I don't know were to put the data about them outside the Blood+ series. --Eruhildo (talk) 18:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Read WP:WAF. Basically out-of-universe info is anything credible and cited that bridges the fictional work with the real world. Anything relating to the character within the ficiton, e.g- a character's role in the anime or information about that character that is written as if they were writing about a real person, is in-universe and shouldn't be too extensive. Out-of-universe info is along the lines of comments about the character from the director, creator, designer, etc..., character popularity, influences from other works, etc...basically any encyclopedic information. As well, plot information should be generally written as if you're talking about a work instead of having the "personal feel". David and Lewis, I wouldn't count on it passing. In terms of finding material, Saya would be our best bet since her popularity impact is far more widespread. Fox816 (talk) 02:30, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for your help. --Eruhildo (talk) 18:30, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The article was deleted initially as a result of the Afd - (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9th Elsewhere). I am not an admin so can only assume the article has been speedily deleted for the same reasons as previously. Always mentions in the deletion log lack of importance. Regards Hammer1980·^talk 18:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

• From looking at the page log, it appears that it has been deleted multiple times for the same reason: It appears to be a website with no indication of importance and/or significance.—Travis^talk 18:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your help. I understand what the log is now, and I think I know what I need to do with the article to get it up to spec. --Eruhildo 20:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello Eruhildo,
I notice that you have some knowledge of Quenya. Would you like to participate on the Quenya Wikipedia? The project has been dormant for quite some time, but as of late there seems to be renewed activity. For the survival of this Wikipedia the creation of new articles is greatly needed. Faultless Quenya is neither expected nor required.
Your help would be highly appreciated.
- Troy 19:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lol, I thought about creating such a thing about a year ago, but I didn't know there already was one. I'd love to participate. After my finals are over next week, I should have enough time to study up on Quenya again and write some articles. I'll look forward to it. Oh, do I need a separate account over there, or will the one I have here work? --Eruhildo 20:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. While looking at the Blood+ category, I noticed you had created this page User:Eruhildo/Chiroptera as a "back up" of an article that was up for AfD, and failed so is now redirected. Per the Wikipedia user page guidelines, specifically Wikipedia:User_page#Copies_of_other_pages, such pages are not appropriate and are subject to deletion, so you may want to go ahead and blank it then CSD it. The same would apply to User:Eruhildo/Saya Otonashi and any other "back ups" you've made. Collectonian (talk) 22:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I didn't know that, thanks for telling me. ^_^ --Eruhildo (talk) 22:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I began a discussion here concerning the categories. I hope we can settle this. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 08:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cool, thanks for telling me. --Eruhildo (talk) 16:53, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you and I'm sure I'll let you know once I found a good and reliable site for information but I can't guarantee if I could find any. Like at one site I looked into, instead of the name Eirene they call it Helen and their information is somewhat unreliable. About Hilga's name, I just found out after watching SoltyRei again in Episode:22. Though I've watched it many times, I ignored the English subtitles so I don't know that name of this huge vessel was already in front of my eyes. Stupid of me. My suggestion is to watch SoltyRei again and based on what you understand of the story. Of course original Japanese, English dubbed is somewhat unsure. That is how I come up the idea about Hilga. Do you have an original copy? If so, that's good.

The episodes I have are Japanese with English subs. I'll check ep22 again and see how they pronounce "Hliga". --Eruhildo (talk) 19:57, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I re-watched ep22 and it sounded like Solty said Hilga (ヒルガ, Hiruga) or Hilda (ヒルガ, Hiruda). I know that Hilda is a real name, but I don't know that Hilga is. Do you know what she said in the English dub? The more I listen to it, the more it sounds like Hilda, but there's a lot of noise during that scene so it's hard to tell. I'll check some Japanese sites to see if either one is listed. --Eruhildo (talk) 23:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sure, I accept the adoption.

By the way, the "leave a message" link at the top goes to another usrs talk page.ɫ§Veonyx§ɫ ^talk_{to me} 22:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lol, that's what I get for copy and paste. Thanks for telling me. If you need any help with anything, let me know. --Eruhildo (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, um that was me. I forgot to log in and well yes it is shared by vandals. Don't worry, next time I will log in.

ɫ§Veonyx§ɫ ^talk_{to me} 22:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lol, mine too. And here I thought I found another good editor to join Wikipedia. Oh, and don't worry about forgetting to log in - we all do it at some point. --Eruhildo (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Template:Anime voices multi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for telling me. I should have tagged it myself already, but I completely forgot about it. I made it before a change in policy, so it's wholly unnecessary now. --Eruhildo (talk) 23:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:Riku, George, and Saya.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:Diva (Blood+).png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Sure, I'm happy to. My edit summary read (contains solid assertion of notability (50 million users) but no sources.) An article that has a strong assertion of notability isn't really suitable for prod deletion. If the article's to be deleted, it'll need AfD. By removing the prod notice, all I'm doing is saying that prod isn't suitable; I'm not saying notability is clearly demonstrated, just claimed. And you're right, it's currently unverified. If you take it to AfD, the AfD will judge if it's unverifiable, which is grounds for deletion, rather than unverified, which is not. Cheers. --Dweller (talk) 22:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I get it. Thanks for the explanation. --Eruhildo (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem. --Dweller (talk) 23:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

i've currently stopped playing dragonfable and editing all they pages so take me off it lol. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew22k (talk • contribs) 09:15, March 15, 2008 (UTC)

Sure thing. Thanks for responding. --Eruhildo (talk) 18:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

In fact would you mind putting me back on the list im going to start editing again so give me a shout if anything needs done.Andrew22k (talk) 23:05, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

That'd be great - we can use the help. --Eruhildo (talk) 16:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello from StrategyWiki :). For your question about SD3, yes that info is relevant to us. It probably should go under the controls section, or maybe even the gameplay section (once someone creates it). Do feel free to register and add any information you can. -- Prod (Talk) 16:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I just might do that. --Eruhildo (talk) 18:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey there! I haven't been on much, so I'm sorry I'm being a slacker apprentice ;) I wanted to ask you a question about that IP user who keeps editing the SoltyRei page. Is there anything that can be done? This is turning into an edit war, and so far he hasn't seen fit to discuss the content with us in the Talk page, even though I keep leaving him messages in HTML comment markup. What is the proper procedure? In keeping with the assuming goodwill paradigm, I'd like to say that I'd like to consider his viewpoint, but it just doesn't seem to be supported by the anime. If multiple editors are in disagreement about content like that, should it just be left out? And is there any way to enforce such a thing, or might this be a long-term edit war of sorts? I'd hate to see that happen.  Elunah であります  Rawr!  20:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I was just thinking the other day how I haven't checked up on you lately, so I guess I've been a slacker mentor :P. What you've done so far with reverting and leaving notes and such is good. There's not much else you can do. Leaving notes in html comment tags is the best way to let IP users know something like that - I've found that a lot of new users don't check the history (try asking your friends if they even know there's a history tab - my friends so far have all said no). Still, it's good to leave an edit summary as it makes it quick for other editors to see what's happened with an article. As you haven't had the same IP editor make the edits a whole bunch, you probably won't be able to get him blocked (espcially if he's made good edits too). You'll have no luck getting IP users blocked from the page - that's only for heavy vandalism and stuff. So for a while all you can do is keep reverting it. If things get really bad you can try WP:Requests for page protection (read WP:PROTECT) and WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (read WP:BLOCK and WP:Blocking IP addresses). By the way, I'm not on much right now and I'm really busy with one article (lots of non-notable stuff getting added by forum kids and stuff; and you think you have it bad) so I may not be able to reply to you the quickest when you need help. Sorry. If you need help quick you can ask Collectonian - she's always fast about replying. Wow, that's was long. --Eruhildo (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I forgot to mention before that if an editor is violating Wikipolicy, you can give them a warning with the templates listed at WP:WARN. That should usually be done before trying to block them. The Facts section would apply in this case. Who knows, he might take notice. --Eruhildo (talk) 19:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the advice! I may end up trying some of those things, but to be honest, I don't think it's a terribly big deal. It's a revert every once in a while. If it gets really intense, like multiple changes in a day, I may have to resort to different measures. Hopefully I can continue working on the side version of the character list. I've been leaving it off because of papers at school =( So much writing! Anyways, thanks for the help, and good luck with those kids!  Elunah であります  Rawr!  02:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I know what you mean about school - I keep getting hit with tests and stuff. Things have slowed down a lot on the page I was busy with, so I'm not having anymore real trouble, but thank for wishing me good luck! Good luck with school and keep up the good work with Wikipedia. ^_^ --Eruhildo (talk) 07:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Per your request, MechQuest has been unprotected. —Travis^talk 20:59, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Could you request for a 2-week semi-protection the Talk:DragonFable page? IP User 137.154.16.30 vandalized it, saying DragonFable is boring. Fortunately, I reverted it. Captain | contribs 10:17, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Protection is only for pages that are being vandalized repeatedly and things like that. As that IP user only vandalized once, it's not nearly enough of a reason to lock the page. So the answer is no. However, if he starts doing it repeatedly, I'll ask to have him blocked from editing. --Eruhildo (talk) 18:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are beginning to annoy me like a fly.........and i enjoy squashing flies.......

--Wizzeled (talk) 02:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

...uh, that doesn't make any sense. I'm just trying to keep the MechQuest article up the MOS standards on external links, which can be found at WP:VG/EL and WP:EL. If you have a problem with Wikipedia policy, then you should stop editing Wikipedia. By the way, it's spelled "gnat". --Eruhildo (talk) 18:32, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, thanks for fixing that article link on the WP:Anime page. Since those couple of lines revolved around that article, which I couldn't get to work, I ended up having to take it out. Thanks for the edit, fix, and readd. Fox816 (talk)

No prob. I'm always trying to use double brackets when I need to use single ones, so I've gotten use to looking for such things. --Eruhildo (talk) 04:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Here is what Enterprise has suggested for an update to the AQ article:

Updates on the AQ article?

What exactly do you mean by "updates"? ɫ§Veonyx§ɫ ^talk_{to me} 22:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Uhhh...It seems to me that the AQ article hasn't been touched for a while.I wish there were pictures of the classes so other people know what it looks like, including me. I haven't played AQ for a long time. Captain | contribs 01:16, 12 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hmm... that is a good idea but to include pics for every class will take up a lot of room and it will look messy. I will check with Eruhildo to see if there is a way to include the pics (I can upload all of them) into the class tables we have set up. We'll see...

ɫ§Veonyx§ɫ ^{~Talk to Me~}_{~My Acts~} 23:56, 12 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

So like I said above, is there ANY way I could get the pics to fit into the wikitables we have for the classes? If not, I could include the links to the pics or can we not do that?

ɫ§Veonyx§ɫ ^{~Talk to Me~}_{~My Acts~} 00:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have uploaded pics for ALL classes. They can be accessed by typing into the wikipedia search engine: Image:AQ(class name goes here).jpg. Make sure you use lowercases in the class name and no () or spaces ^_^. Please tell me if they are ok. By the way, I now know how to insert the pics into the tables, just that they will have to be scaled down, especially the wizard one.

ɫ§Veonyx§ɫ ^{~Talk to Me~}_{~My Acts~} 05:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I couldn't respond sooner - I haven't been online in two days. Ok, here's the deal on pics: if they're non-free, like these are, they must appear in an article or they will be deleted (FU7). Also, one should try to use as few non-free pics as posible in an article (FU3). For more details on non-free content, see WP:NONFREE. I wouldn't suggest putting in pics in the tables as it look kind of messy (and the tables look great now). Well, you might be able to fit one at the start of the Classes section, but it's up to you. You won't be able to use most of them (if you had a single snapshot showing several classes together, that might work). I suggest you add {{subst:orfud}} to the images you're not going to use, otherwise a bot will do it for you and put a bunch of annoying messages on your talk page (I5). --Eruhildo (talk) 14:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, can I ask what the source is for the vol 7 chapter list you added to Gunslinger Girl? It hasn't been solicited yet. Also, are you sure that Triela and Claes on the cover? The two women I'm looking at seem to be adults, so unless something has dramatically changed in the story, I don't think that's them. Collectonian (talk) 06:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sure. Chapters 35 and 36 are in English, chapters 33, 34, and 37 I translated. 33: 彼女の箱庭 (I've seen this translated as "The Girl and Her Minature Garden"). 32: 約束 (this one is pronounced "yakusoku", you may have heard it in anime or something before). 37: 勇者は恐れず. I haven't gotten to the point in the volume where they change Triela and Claes, but I glanced through and noticed older versions of them. This discussion mentions it. Is that enough? --Eruhildo (talk) 06:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

EDIT: Finished the volume. Triela and Claes basically got makeup jobs and changed clothes and stuff to make them look older and more "hip". The way they look on the cover is the way they look in part of the manga. --Eruhildo (talk) 07:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ah, okay. They look weird to me, but oh well. :P Now, let's see if ADV releases it before 2009....Collectonian (talk) 07:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Eruhildo, I know you don't really do many University articles, but could you do a review for McGill University? It's located at Wikipedia:Peer review/McGill University/archive1. Take your time please, as I want to help get this article to FA. And please respond on my talk page if you can. Thanks --Sunsetsunrise (talk) 12:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I do know that i hadn't help 1000 articles yet. it's just a joke, no need to get pissed —Preceding unsigned comment added by Estarrol (talk • contribs) 00:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. Just delete my post - I was being stupid. --Eruhildo (talk) 00:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Is there a way to state that a major edit is happening and that it would be kind not to edit a particular page? Ronan Alifar (talk) 21:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, check out Wikipedia:Edit lock - it explains how to use the {{inuse}} template. --Eruhildo (talk) 21:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm familiar with the spoiler policy, but there are still times when you need to make a judgment call. The spoiler policy is not intended to suggest we have to include spoilers, only that we not be concerned about spoilers interfering with the completeness of the article. In this case, the entire ending to the book is actually destroyed if you know the narrator's name; if you only read the manga, you don't realize the scale of it (which is why it keeps getting added.) Since nobody would ever expect the character's names to have an effect like that, I think his name is better addressed in a separate section - which would need sourcing on the importance of the unnamed narrator. As it stands, I think the significance of the narrator's name does not outweigh the damage caused, and an exception needs to be made. Doceirias (talk) 19:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok, you've convinced me; however, the article currently says: "an unnamed male narrator" - that is incorrect and should be changed. Perhaps something like just "a boy" or "a boy who remains unnamed until late in the story" or something like that, and then of course explain why in another section. --Eruhildo (talk) 19:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

ummm.. thanks for the heads-up, but I wasn't trying to editwar. (to be honest, I have no idea what the subject of the article is). I was reverting stuff like this and I had to wait for an admin to block the guy. Just wanted to let you know. Regards. Thingg^⊕⊗ 20:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I see what you mean. Probably both MQ and DF need cleanup for style! Alinnisawest (talk) 17:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're probably right, I haven't been through them in a while and I've had trouble keeping up with the changes a bit, so I'm sure there are spots I've missed. Thanks for all your hard work lately. --Eruhildo (talk) 18:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome... I'm on a lot because I pretty much have nothing else to do, so if I notice something, I try to fix it. Alinnisawest (talk) 21:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'd be happy to. I'll add your name at the status page at WP:ADCO and give you a formal review in a bit. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 04:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I look forward to your guidance. --Eruhildo (talk) 05:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Note that I haven't forgotten you, I've just been pushed for time recently. I'll get that formal review to you as soon as I can (a "formal review" from me is really long, see User talk:Gary King/Archive 4#Comments from your coach or User talk:Vivio Testarossa/Archive 3#Coaching offer for what that means, and feel free to read them for tips). Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 23:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wow, that is long. Don't worry about taking a while, I'm in no rush. Just to let you know so you don't have to go checking whether I do, I don't ever use scripts or Twinkle or anything like that. I just like doing things by hand (don't trust computers to think since I write software). --Eruhildo (talk) 02:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Eruhildo. I was wondering: Could I put that template back? It seems a lot neater and more organized with the template in there. If not, why? Ronan Alifar (talk) 21:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hmm.. the list looks messier than I expected. Ok sure, just move what you wrote to the talk page since I think it will be helpful. --Eruhildo (talk) 22:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I was expecting...well, I actually am not sure of what I was expecting. Anyway, the template deletion tag has been removed, everything is (hopefully) organized now. Ronan Alifar (talk) 00:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Eruhildo. I have a quick question... Is it possible that every time someone new joins the project, is there any rule prohibiting the members of said project to send a kind of...almost like a welcome template, with links to Video game guidelines, and such? 'cause I wrote something like it that could be used for WikiProject AE.

Thanks for letting me waste your time. Ronan Alifar (talk) 20:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I brought that up on the project talk page a while back but got no responce. I'd love to see what you've come up with. Sorry for the late response - I was out of town for the weekend and forgot to mention it in my notice at the top. --Eruhildo (talk) 22:49, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, I have the wiki markup assembled, I was wondering how it would be best to send it to you. Should I post it on this talk page? Or on the WikiProject Discussion/Main Page somewhere? Ronan Alifar (talk) 00:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why don't you create a sandbox and drop the code in there. That would be the easiest thing. Plus it will let you see how it would look and give you a chance to tweak it. --Eruhildo (talk) 03:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've had some very very personal issues that have stopped me going on here. Forgive my lateness. Here is the sandbox...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ronan_Alifar/templatetest Ronan Alifar (talk) 02:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's ok, I haven't been on much the last few days anyway. Wow, really good job with the welcome template. I'll add it too the project right away. --Eruhildo (talk) 07:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wow, thanks! Ronan Alifar (talk) 01:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Also, successfully created and used template on the new user! Ronan Alifar (talk) 19:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

For five stars! I exceptly adore that image. This reminds me teams of justice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MagnusLordN (talk • contribs) 21:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Uh, you're welcome. --Eruhildo (talk) 03:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I'm glad to hear you're interested in getting some organized manhwa work going! Right now, Wikiproject Comics has a World Comics working group that, at present, doesn't include the Asian comics category. I thought this would be a great place to stick manhwa, since manhwa will probably never attain the kind of massiveness that the Anime & Manga project has, and because it will allow for consistency with other "related" types of comics like Chinese manhua. I've left a message there asking if we can add manhwa (and other non-Japanese Asian comics, once a little more research is done) into the scope, and then we can "move in" and really get rolling. Does that sound amenable? The idea is just the same, just with a little bit different organizational structure, and I don't see there being any stepped-on toes or conflicts of interest in working with the existing comics project. Most of the folks there are focused on American comic strips and (mostly) the extensive Marvel/DC types of American comics, so we'd be pretty self-contained, I think. Based on your experiences, do you agree? Whatever the organizational structure winds up being, I look forward to working with you!! --hamu♥hamu (talk) 19:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've just been informed that manhwa and other Asian comics have a home in the Comics Wikiproject's World Comics working group! Their omission from the scope was an accidental oversight, and will be rectified in the near future. Please head over to the project and add your name to the general participants list as well as the world comics participants list, and start tagging manhwa articles' talk pages with the group's template. Go ahead and add Korea Wikiproject's template, too, if it's not already there. Please also check out the working group's talk page, where I'm about to start a very rough list of possible tasks. I'm really excited and look forward to working with you! --hamu♥hamu (talk) 04:00, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cool! Thanks for telling me. I get started when I have a chance. --Eruhildo (talk) 16:59, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Faln angel82 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I think your doing a great job on Atrix Entertainment Article's. Cheers!

Hey, I told you a while ago that I would be your admin coach, and I find now that I really don't have the time or the mindset that I imagined I do for that kind of thing. You've certainly done a lot of work, much of it that would be considered gnoming, but if you want to be an administrator, you need to participate in administrator-specific fields, namely WP:AFD, tagging articles for speedy deletion using Special:Newpages, reverting vandalism and making reports to WP:AIV (which nowadays, requires WP:HUGGLE or WP:TWINKLE to even have a remote chance of catching vandalism before it is reverted by someone using the aforementioned tools), and more. I recommend that you try to seek another administrator coach at WP:ADCO, although I am always open if you want advice or anything of the sort. Best wishes, Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 21:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's ok, I've been pretty busy lately too, so I haven't been here much. Yeah, I do a lot of gnoming, though I have revamped a couple of articles. Been meaning to write several, but haven't got around to it yet. I'll take your suggestions and hopefully work myself closer to adminship before looking for another coach. Thank you so much for the help and the links! --Eruhildo (talk) 04:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

This is an example of one of the narrations at the end of Trigun(English Version):

"People who sin say this:"That they had to, to survive." People who sin say this:"It too late now to stop." The shadow called "Sin" dogs them steadily from behind, silently with out a word. Remorse and Agony are repeated only to end up at despair, in the end. But the Sinners just don't know that if they'd only turn around, there's a light there. A light which keeps shining on them ever so warmly, a light that will never fade." -"Vash the Stampede", Trigun Episode Seven: "BND"- *Some of the notations and format could or need to be corrected but this is ruffly the words that was said.*

My reason is many of the "end episode" narrations may contain a Christian context. As such, it can be seen that these pieces of epilogue-like dialog reflect the spiritual/and or religious beliefs of Vash due to his character and his actions displayed in the series. Maybe it should be a small mentioned in as a part of of the themes found in Trigun.( More concrete research is required.)---AKIRA70 (talk) 03:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're right, the end narrations did have a kind of deep/spiritually theme to them. I didn't think Vash said them, though I've only seen the Japanese version and it's been a while. As much as I would love to add that into the article, it falls under original research (a.k.a. "no go"). If you could find a review or a book or something that says something like that, then we could cite it and put it in the article, but otherwise we can't include it. Thanks for providing an example and coming up with idea though. --Eruhildo (talk) 04:13, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

No prob. Anything I can do to Help.--AKIRA70 (talk) 06:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Also: I would like to Invite you to talk on my talk page under a new topic of mine titled "Can Wikipedia Change, Should it Change?" Also feel free to invite anyone else you think can contribute to this topic. Go all over Wiki is necessary. I'll try to do the same to. I thank you for reading this even if you don't respond to it. And if you do . . . Yaaaaaaay.:~)-BTJM--AKIRA70 (talk) 08:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, cool. Would you be Jacob? What edit of mine did you see? --Dan Hudlow (talk) 02:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, I think you need to see this comment on the talk page for the AE article: Talk:Artix Entertainment#Staff Section. Do you think it's for real? --Alinnisawest(talk) 23:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, update. I emailed Safiria at safiria at battleon dot com, and she replied and confirmed it was true, so... I suppose we should remove them then? --Alinnisawest(talk) 23:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for bringing this up to me - I wouldn't have seen it otherwise (I'm a bit behind ^_^;;). I think you handled the situation well. I left a comment on the talk page explaining my view on it. --Eruhildo (talk) 23:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for leaving me a message and the request to join! I will join, Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dacheatcode (talk • contribs) 23:03, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I would like to tell you, the project leader, I unfortunately will have to pull out from the Artix Entertainment project as:

• My knowledge on either games, MechQuest and DragonFable has become rather ancient, and thus will not help. And I doubt I can catch up anytime soon because:

• School. Need I say more?

• And probably most of my free time that I can use on Wikipedia will be mostly taken up working on McGill or the Blue Jays.

However, I would like to come back to the project a year from now after McGill has been finished and I've caught up with the plot of MechQuest and Dragonfable.

Thank you,

Sunsetsunrise (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

P.S. Please reply on my talk page.

Well, sorry about your lack of time recently, but I know how school goes. You might want to come over and check what I've done with the thing though, I think it looks pretty good now. --erachima talk 01:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

It looks great! I'm a little confused as to what the refs linking to each volume's Amazon listing in the chapter list are for though. Also, I would suggest trimming the plot section way down (like to one paragraph) and taking the paragraphs about each volume and putting them in the appropriate Summary fields in the chapter listing. That done, I'd call it a B class article. Good work. --Eruhildo (talk) 03:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I plan on tracking down a few more reception references and trying for GA with the thing. (I'll probably also end up wussing out and page referencing the in universe info so that the reference count looks better, though frankly that shouldn't be necessary and doesn't improve the page AT ALL.)

To address the questions you brought up, the Amazon refs are just convenience links for ISBN and release data. For plot summary, I think the current length is acceptable, especially since it covers the setting and terminology as well. Splitting it up into individual volume summaries would be unhelpful for two reasons that I see: first, it would require a lot of redundancy between the media and plot sections, and second, volumes 2-4 have almost nothing happen in them, so their summaries are best combined. Otherwise, we'd have to give excessively detailed retelling of the fight scenes to pad the paragraph lengths up to grammatically acceptable standards. A lesser reason is that I've never seen a page use the summary field unless it was an independent list (ala List of Bleach chapters), though I'll admit I haven't exactly gone looking.

On a somewhat related note, have you seen this yet? It looks like a major article improvement drive is in order if our project is going to be ready for 0.7 next month. --erachima talk 04:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dear (manga), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Regards, Ben Aveling 20:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK. My position isn't that the topic is non-notable, just that from contents of the article, it's not clear that it is notable. Thanks, Ben Aveling 00:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can you explain what your edit summary here means?[1] It sounds like these are summaries taken from somewhere else, which is a really big no no. For now, I've reverted pending response. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ah, I guess I should have been clearer. I definitely wouldn't take them from some place else! They were written by someone I know from a Gunslinger Girl focused forum for the purpose of updating the article here. The other members don't have accounts, so they've just been having me make all the updates. Sorry for the confusion. --Eruhildo (talk) 23:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay...I think that might be a bit fuzzy on the copyvio line, though, since forum posts are copyrighted. It would probably be better if he did the updates himself (he doesn't have to have an account to do it), but not going to worry about it too much. :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I've been thinking about telling him that. Basically, there's several forum members that have gotten together to work on cleaning up the Gunslinger Girl articles and I've been clarifying Wikipedia guidelines and stuff to them as none of them are familiar with them. I've also been making edits as they point out stuff to me that needs to be fixed. --Eruhildo (talk) 01:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry to trouble you during your wikibreak but I need your help. Please refer to:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AdventureQuest&diff=253983025&oldid=253786063
• User talk:Marasmusine
• User talk:Mark Chung

User:Marasmusine thinks the sections he/she deleted is a bit unsourced and breaks Wikipedia policy guidelines. What do you think?

Please respond both here and on my talk page, please.

--Mark Chung (talk) 13:21, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I'm late - I haven't been on Wikipedia since before Thanksgiving (was out of town). Everything Marasmusine was saying seems reasonable - having verifiable sources is important. It seems the two of you have worked everything out now, right? If you want to look for sources, I suggest starting at the WP:VG's list of sources. Oh, and I do have an AQ account, but I rarely use it 'cause I'm busy and I prefer DF. --Eruhildo (talk) 03:57, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Do you have an AQ account? Please answer on my talk page, and here (if you like). --Mark Chung (talk) 13:23, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

You have forgotten the planet zargon on mechquest. rescue the superheroes, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.7.176 (talk) 01:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I read Talk:AdventureQuest and saw:

{{maintained}}

How are you nominated/chosen/qualified?

Can I have your charater page? Mine is

1. http://aq.battleon.com/build30/charview.asp?temp=53188974 2. http://www.aqstats.com/charinfo.php?id=53188974#

Thanks!--Mark Chung (talk) 06:00, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Answer on my talk page, please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Chung (talk • contribs) 06:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to go ahead, close the discussion, and perform the big merge using the stuff in my Sandbox. If you still want to change the headings in each entry as you proposed in the merger discussion, go ahead; I don't have any opinion on that. Thanks, MuZemike 05:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Meh, it's not a big deal. Now that I look at it again, I think it's probably more readable the way it is. But thanks anyway! And thanks for your hard work on the articles! --Eruhildo (talk) 06:21, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I know I've been away for a while (what, four months or so?), but I just wanted to let you know I'm back on the Wiki, and I hope to do some work on the articles. I cleaned up AQWorlds today, because it needed some serious work, and was going to look around and see where else I'm needed.

Are you still on the Wikiproject? Or has it sort of died out again? Sorry again for leaving without any notice, I had personal problems. --Alinnisawest,^{Dalek Empress} (extermination requests here) 21:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yay! Long time no see. I've been pretty busy the last couple of months so I haven't been around much either. With the two of us fairly inactive, the project has been rather quite. Some new members have shown up (mostly for AQW), but they could use some experienced help. I can't wait till I have the time to do major revisions and write up guidelines. Thanks for cleaning the AQW article - it's needed it badly for a while. --Eruhildo (talk) 19:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I saw the new people... I was looking over the MQ article, and you could tell it hasn't been watched over as carefully as it could have been. There was a lot of little bits of misinformation- the sort of thing that just gets shuffled in there and no one really notices it. I cleaned it up, but haven't had a chance to look at the DF article yet. --Alinnisawest,^{Dalek Empress} (extermination requests here) 19:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:Angelica Gunslinger Girl.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:Beatrice Gunslinger Girl.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on List of Gunslinger Girl characters/TOC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Editor437 (talk) 03:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have finished drafting the article and moved it out of my user space. I did the best I can with translations and rōmaji, but I'd like it if you gave it a onceover. However, I think up to chapter 8 has been released in English in Yen Press' Yen Plus, but can't find official English titles. In addition, I used the cover of the first volume rather than the collection as I'm not sure if the FUR will hold. Expansion on that is found here. Reply or look at it at your leisure. ~Itzjustdrama ^{? C} 20:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The translations look good except for the ishi ones, but those are... messy. Half of them are just combinations of kanji and not actual words as far as I can tell. I fixed some of the rōmaji - when は is used as a particle it's romanized "wa", and when you see something like された at the end of a verb that's part of the conjugation. --Eruhildo (talk) 23:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The ishi ones have all いし as furigana. So that's what I put them down as in the rōmaji. ~Itzjustdrama ^{? C} 00:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The rōmaji for the ishi ones was fine, it's the translations I find a bit questionable, at least going by the character's meanings. --Eruhildo (talk) 02:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The translation, yeah, are kind of weird. I find most of them okay, have to force them a little. But 移徙 and 以次 I can't make heads or tails of. ~Itzjustdrama ^{? C} 02:34, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, those were the ones I had the biggest issue with. I would translate 移徙 as "Move" instead of "Change" as both characters have that reading according to EDICT and in Chinese it means something like "migration". As for 以次, I would say something like "hereafter", "from now on", or "the future" would be closer than "plus". A similar word is 以後 (wiktionary:以後, wiktionary:ja:以後); I'm guessing the mangaka just needed a character that could be pronounced shi and chose 次. --Eruhildo (talk) 03:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Those are a lot better translations. I'll go add them onto the list. I think I'll change seat to chair as chair is actually what it says. ~Itzjustdrama ^{? C} 03:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I noticed the subject article is on your list of things to do. I'm starting to edit it, TV Episode list first. My bandwidth is not particularly high, so changes aren't going to happen very fast (weeks, not hours or days). Feel free to leave me messages back here, on my talk page, or on the article's talk page. --Unready (talk) 19:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oh good, the article has needed that for a while. I was working on the character summaries before, but I got busy in real life and haven't been on Wikipedia for a while. I'll try to get back on that soon and then we can make a good article out of it. ^_^ --Eruhildo (talk) 22:48, 19 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in the recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

• Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
• Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

—WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:26, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Eruhildo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 401 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Kazumasa Hirai (author) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Artix Entertainment. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artix Entertainment (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

 Template:AE-nav has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Izno (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 Template:WikiProject Artix Entertainment has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Reach Out to the Truth 20:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Are you still active? Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 03:57, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

They seem ready to delete an article added most of the content on, Watashi no Ōkami-san. Just wanted to say, I imported it to the manga wiki, full history and everything, so it will be preserved somewhere. If you want you can continue editing it over there, along with over seven thousand other manga related articles. http://manga.wikia.com/wiki/Watashi_no_Okami-san Dream Focus 08:39, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're awesome. Thank you for saving it. --Eruhildo (talk) 04:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Sig-time has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AE for Artix Template.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:19, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Vndb has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. JC · Xbox · Talk · Contributions 01:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply