Atif.t2

Hello Atif,

I email you a request please read it and feel free to contact me. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinca (talk • contribs) 18:30, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your email has been replied to you regarding the request. Atif.t2 (talk) 18:47, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I am in Love with your Clock, although currently I can not change it to my Time zone, in fact I don't even know what System you used. If you could just edit in the time zones for EST, United States.

Just format it to EST. Thanks.

Rttam (talk) 20:05, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Glad you liked it. I use IST time zone. I am posting two clocks in EST time zone. One is with Daylight Saving Time and the other is not. Pick the one you want. Thanks Atif.t2 (talk) 20:34, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

With Daylight Saving Time

Atif.t2 (talk) 20:34, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey Mate, it seems that the Clock has stopped, I last edited it at 6:44 PM (My Userpage, now redone) and I just checked, it was still there. - I had to re-enter the code, in order for it too work. Rttam (talk) 00:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well the clock seems to work fine on both my user page and the talk page. Maybe your browser didn't refresh the page. Anyway if it still doesn't work leave me a message and I will see what is the issue. Atif.t2 (talk) 00:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Remember the page has to be refreshed to display the current time. If you just leave your page the time will not change. This means whenever anyone will check the page the time shown will be your current time. Atif.t2 (talk) 00:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Additionally you can purge the clock to show the current time by clicking on the date shown in the clock. Atif.t2 (talk) 00:20, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your clock seems to work fine now since I have purged it. Atif.t2 (talk) 00:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

• Much thanks, Atif.t2. And thanks for the help. :) Rttam ^TN_C 17:01, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the feedback. I see what you mean by the Simpsons articles.

I started by noticing on the List of Law & Order episodes page that even shorter articles had already been created with only the six main cast members and the short summaries. Since these shorter articles had been created and not challenged, I added guest cast to them and then created other articles by following the same pattern.

Now that at least some of my additions have been reversed, these articles remain in their originally shorter form. I will add more detail to my future submissions. But I'm not clear as to why these originally skeleton articles were created or remain unchanged.

````Jdlankin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdlankin (talk • contribs) 05:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jdlankin, You can always actively edit the article and make it better. Please add one of the templates on this page while editing. If your edits are reverted follow it up with the persons who reverted it or you can also discuss it in the articles talk page. The articles may have been left like that by the editor due to lack of information. Thanks for contributing. Atif.t2 (talk) 17:17, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for all your vandal fighting! Pikiwyn talk 19:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Atif.t2 (talk) 19:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage yesterday. It's my first userpage vandal, so now I qualify as a real Wikipedian! Besides, now I know that someone's looked at my page other than me. As a token of my appreciation, I undid vandalism to your page. A. Parrot (talk) 00:17, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for spotting out some sneaky vandalism that i obviously missed. Glad there are others like you nuking the vandals. Atif.t2 (talk) 00:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:55, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Courcelles, for the rights, Will do my best to have the queue clear.. Atif.t2 (talk) 21:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Photography is not and cannot be 'art'. How did that get on here? (I am a photographer, by the way.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.23.119.186 (talk) 21:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

As requested on your talk page, please wait for consensus before deleting sections from an article without an edit summary. Atif.t2 (talk) 21:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

This person keep undoing factual information. He is deleting information by one artist and not others showing that this is a personal attack. IP address is 74.176.122.147 I saw you did correct it before and I had to go back and change it again today. Please ban this person. Flavaguy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavaguy (talk • contribs) 15:54, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Flavaguy, I could only find his previous edits, is he using any other accounts!! if so please report him as a sockpuppet or as i am not an admin get help at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Atif.t2 (talk) 16:12, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I've created the page User:Siddhartha Ghai/List of colleges in Meerut. Please review and discuss here.Thanks!--Siddhartha Ghai (talk) 12:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Do not add the French name for the former European kingdom on the island of Great Britain in what is today part of England and Wales back as French is not an official language of the former sovereign state. It's so impossible to do so, however. 156.209.84.53 (talk) 17:26, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

My account was compromised and these edits were unintentional. I have just got back control of my account. Atif.t2 (talk) 09:04, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply