Aceusa

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You have been told a number of times before, but you are still adding messages to talk pages without signing. Please take notice. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:28, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:15, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for being so adamant in creating UFC 157. I thought it was strange and unjust how it was the only numbered UFC event without its own article. Hopefully now it will be allowed to stay. Make91 (talk) 21:10, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

No problem. And it will stay. Theepicwarrior (talk) 21:14, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Barak Obama. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 19:43, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm DUCKISJAMMMY. I noticed that you made a change to an article, UFC 205, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Logan Miller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Walking Dead. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Aceusa (talk) 01:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited UFC 213, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valentina Shevchenko. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2003–04 Los Angeles Lakers season have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 13:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to Floyd Mayweather Jr. vs. Conor McGregor has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bitcoin, you may be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to HuffPost. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 12:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Aceusa, Greeting to you. Please note that when a bout is announced by the press, content and sourced are added to the "Announced bout" section. When the bout shown on UFC.com fight card, then the content from the "Announced bout" section is removed and place in the fight card section. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:11, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at University of California. Arbitrarily altering financial information without providing or citing a source. →‎ GS →‎ ☎ → 01:25, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn't the endowment on University of California be the same as University of California, San Diego? Aceusa (talk) 01:27, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC 245. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. You have been informed that only when the "announced" bout has shown in UFC.com fight card then the "announced bout" can move to fight card section. pls do not do it again before checking the status in UFC.com fight card prior editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hunter Biden. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Liz. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Hunter Biden, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Page Six is a gossip column and is not considered a reliable source. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hunter Biden. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 22:13, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:05, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 03:54, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Avenged Sevenfold discography, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 11:31, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hunter Biden, you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:51, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

How did I vandalize the page? I used reliable sources. Aceusa (talk) 20:52, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit to Joey Diaz, as this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. As others have pointed out to you above, Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 04:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Aceusa, pls do not change the headliner name as it is based on UFC.com event page - see here. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 00:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Avenged Sevenfold; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binho24 (talk) 23:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring, as you did at Avenged Sevenfold. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Kinu ^t/_c 08:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Given that you've been blocked for edit warring before, you really should know not to do this by now. --Kinu ^t/_c 08:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to List of National Basketball Association career 3-point scoring leaders has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 01:34, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2009 SEC Championship Game into Game of the Century (college football). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 01:17, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Again at this article, where you copied text from 2010 BCS National Championship Game without the required attribution. Please be sure to follow this important step each and every time you copy text from one Wikipedia article to another. DanCherek (talk) 23:57, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that in this edit to Game of the Century (college football), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr.weedle (talk) 00:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hi Aceusa! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Linkin Park several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Linkin Park, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Please take the dispute to the talk page.. ZimZalaBim ^talk 19:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I was going to give you the standard edit warring warning but then saw you've already been blocked for edit warring...three times? And now you're on the verge of a fourth one. Is there something about the concept you don't understand? Anything I can do to make it clearer? At the very least, make yourself familiar with WP:BRD. Following it could help keep you out of trouble... Sergecross73 msg me 20:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2008 in film‎ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Betty Logan (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply