Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Welcome!

edit

Hi Calfracsets! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 14:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit

Information icon  Hello, I'm Russ Woodroofe. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Wikipedia is not the place to promote your research. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

Information icon  Hello, Calfracsets. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

Information icon  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 11:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 14:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Stop icon  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fractional calculus. Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources

edit

The rules for reliable sources are discussed at WP:RS. In particular, addition of a large number of primary sources, many with unclear connection to the article and method, as you did at Fixed-point iteration, is not so helpful. Wikipedia prefers secondary sources. A numerical analysis book would be helpful there. Or what is the best of the sources you suggested at Fixed-point iteration? Comment that there is this Springer book by Das that makes the connection with fractional calculus. It might be worthwhile to get the attention of some folks with more expertise from WP:Wikiproject Maths. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 13:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Control copyright icon  Hello Calfracsets! Your additions to Fractional calculus have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fractional calculus of sets (September 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OhHaiMark (talk) 19:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo 
Hello, Calfracsets! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OhHaiMark (talk) 19:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fractional calculus of sets has been accepted

edit
 
Fractional calculus of sets, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Fractional calculus of sets for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fractional calculus of sets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fractional calculus of sets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply