213.8.151.40

  Hello, I'm Blue Edits. I noticed that you recently removed content from Abby Stein without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Blue Edits (talk) 11:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Abby Stein, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Blue Edits (talk) 11:41, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Yitzchok Zilberstein, you may be blocked from editing. ZLEA _Talk\^Contribs 13:25, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Yitzchok Zilberstein. Meszzy² (talk) 18:02, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jewish views of poverty, wealth and charity, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Per WP:BRD when your edit has been undone you should discuss it on the article's talkpage rather than restoring it Meters (talk) 20:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

 

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

  Hello, I'm 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Current events/2023 March 10. Carter00000 (talk) 10:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Temporarily blocked for disruptive editing. Wikipedia content is based on what is said in reliable sources, not on the individual editor's points of view. It is also a collaborative project, so when multiple editors tell you your edits are disruptive it's usually wise to listen to their advice. Just some things to remember for when the block expires. -- Euryalus (talk) 10:11, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply