Talk:WPTZ

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on WPTZ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110629001649/http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db0105/DA-10-2443A1.pdf to http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db0105/DA-10-2443A1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I propose merging the article WNNE into WPTZ, because they are essentially one station now. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disagree. WNNE is a separate station with a unique history in its own right. Although it is a satellite of WPTZ, the articles do not have to be merged. KansasCity (talk) 00:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

• Oppose: WP:BROADCAST suggests that a station (such as WNNE) that was once a full-fledged station and only later became a rebroadcaster/translator/satellite is generally still treated as a separate station for the purposes of having any potential presumption of independent notability from its present parent station (i.e. WPTZ). (After all, notability is not temporary.) WNNE-TV was completely separate from WPTZ, both in operation and ownership, from 1978 to 1990, and even after the stations came under common ownership and WNNE became a satellite of WPTZ from a regulatory standpoint, WNNE still produced its own newscasts until 2001 (and some Upper Valley-specific news inserts seem to have remained in WNNE's simulcasts of WPTZ newscasts as late as 2007) — even a satellite/rebroadcaster that still does (or once did) some local programming separate from the parent station can get the presumption of notability that a station that has been a satellite/rebroadcaster of another station from day one cannot. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disagree WNNE has a significant history that would either be lost in a merger or would make the merged story very confusing.

While they should not be merged, please note that as of August, 2018, WNNE has been completely merged into WPTZ and the transmitter is going off the air.