Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Wikipedia

Talk:Svetlana Kuznetsova/GA4

< Talk:Svetlana Kuznetsova
Latest comment: 12 years ago by TonyTheTiger in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago201 comments3 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 14:55, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

All images need {{personality rights}}--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Done--GoPTCN 16:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

The following issues seem to remain unresolved from GA2 by reviewer Philcha (talk · contribs)--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • "Kuznetsova's win over World No. 11 Anastasia Myskina in the second round of the Pacific Life Open in Indian Wells, California was her first over a top-10 player this year" - World No. 11, top-10 player? --Philcha (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC). Reiterate now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Done
  • Done
  • And "At..." or "In ..."? Please check this right through the article. A long time ago, a French teacher told me prepositions are the hardest thing to master in 2nd languages. --Philcha (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC) Given wimbledon example above, I reiterate this.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • I am pretty sure it is "at the doubles". Also I think you can say both "at Wimbledon" or "in Wimbledon", but I am not a native speaker...
  • Done
  • Thanks, done
WP:LEAD
  • "and never broke this record" should probably be something like, "which remains her career-high"

Note: I have been making copy edits to the beginning of the article (Lead, Early life, Career: 2000, 2001-2002 and 2003) to assist GoP in his efforts but realize that TonyTheTiger is now conducting his review. To prevent further risk of our edits & review getting their wires crossed I'll wait until the outcome of the review before making any further edits. Two final observations for GoP: there are a few deadlinks and the subsection "Playing Style" does not belong in the "Off-Court" section.--Wolbo (talk) 14:20, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

If your copyedit will take less than a week or so, I would prefer if you complete it before I finish my review.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
(2x ce) Thanks for your copyedits. I will fix these issues. Regards.--GoPTCN 15:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
I have expanded the playing style, fixed the dead links and formatted the last sections.--GoPTCN 15:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
TTT, I think it would probably be best if I finish my 'non-review review/copyedit' and it should not take long at all, certainly not a week. GoP, is that OK with you or do you want to proceed directly with the GA review? As you are the one who requested the GA review I'll leave the choice up to you.--Wolbo (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well, I am a participant at WP:CUP, so I don't want to lose in this round. If this passes I get 60 points and will probably advance.--GoPTCN 16:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
The copyeditor was already ahead of where I am in the article. I am still working on the LEAD. Even without a copyedit, I am not sure this would pass within the next week. I have not looked at /GA3 and have only read the LEAD other than look at /GA2. Are these your only potential points?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
I have Otis Redding in reserve, which is a good candidate considering its history of turbulent nominations...--GoPTCN 17:29, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Try to get your points with Redding. I am not sure this one will make it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Finalized my review and (significant) copy edit session. --Wolbo (talk) 23:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
2000
ITF Junior Career
  • You have never said when she appeared "In Minsk, Belarus". If I understand rankings correctly, they are dated as of the end of a specific week. I am asking you to say something like "receiving her first ranking of 889 during the week ending Month DD, YYYY", after adding the date of the tournament.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 11:21, 23 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
2001–2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
  • The match was the longest recorded women's Grand Slam match in the Open Era, with a final scoreline of 6–4, 1–6, 16–14, and the second-longest women's match in the Open Era. - I think there is a link for longest matches and some have articles.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
2012
Fed Cup
Coaches
Appearances in video games

Review of progress

edit
  • I count 8 weeks at number 3 (7 consecutive) not 5.
  • You are correct. Done.

The third point is not a dealbreaker.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I am also not pressing for a mixed doubles record.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:27, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Great work. Good Luck in the WP:CUP. I am going to pass this.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:04, 27 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Svetlana_Kuznetsova/GA4&oldid=1051730375"