Talk:Juliomys anoblepas

For this article, I drew on a translation of Winge's text by KimDabelsteinPetersen (talk · contribs), given here. I assumed that Winge's measurements were in millimeters on the basis of comparisons of his measurements of upper toothrow length in Calomys longicaudatus and Calomys saltator with those in living Oligoryzomys nigripes and Hylaeamys laticeps (Weksler and Bonvicino, 2005; Musser et al., 1998), which revealed that Winge's measurements, if they were in millimeters, were within the range of variation of the modern species they referred to. Ucucha 00:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:Oryzomys anoblepas/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Airplaneman ✈ 00:05, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):   b (MoS):  

   Technical terms well explained; I otherwise would not have been able to do this review :). Airplaneman ✈ 00:05, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  

   All claims sourced! I know good refs are probably scarce for this topic, but the more [good refs] the better. Airplaneman ✈ 00:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects):   b (focused):  

   I learned something new today. Airplaneman ✈ 00:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:  

   Sure does  Y Airplaneman ✈ 00:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:  

   Yup. Airplaneman ✈ 00:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

   Good here. Airplaneman ✈ 00:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:  

   Definitely GA quality. Airplaneman ✈ 00:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

It's a Juliomys: http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2011/2/zt02788p044.pdf . I'll revise the article in a week. Ucucha 17:00, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Juliomys anoblepas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060223104303/http://www.faculty.uaf.edu/ffmw1/pdfs/Weksler.2005a.pdf to http://www.faculty.uaf.edu/ffmw1/pdfs/Weksler.2005a.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply