Talk:Gpl-violations.org

This article could do with some fleshing out, including some case histories, list of successful cases, etc. An impact analysis would also be great. Achitnis 14:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I thought German law didn't recognize Stare Decisis... AnonMoos 21:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The gpl-violations.org website appears to be down, does anyone have news with how the organisation is doing?

Additionally they won a case against Fantec in 2013, not sure if notable, details here Jonpatterns (talk) 13:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Looks like it's back up now. Don't know when that happened, though... 199.58.98.69 (talk) 04:46, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Looks like it went back up in October 2015. http://gpl-violations.org/news/20151027-homepage-recovers/ 199.58.98.69 (talk) 04:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gpl-violations.org. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141007073104/http://gpl-violations.org/news/20060922-dlink-judgement_frankfurt.html to http://gpl-violations.org/news/20060922-dlink-judgement_frankfurt.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gpl-violations.org. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110813092325/http://gpl-violations.org/about.html to http://gpl-violations.org/about.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080605155843/http://gpl-violations.org/news/20080528-fsfe_ftf.html to http://gpl-violations.org/news/20080528-fsfe_ftf.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141031173419/http://gpl-violations.org/news/20050414-fortinet-injunction.html to http://gpl-violations.org/news/20050414-fortinet-injunction.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070426150816/http://ftp.gpl-devices.org/pub/vendors/Fortinet/20050514/ to http://ftp.gpl-devices.org/pub/vendors/Fortinet/20050514/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply