Talk:Georgia in the American Civil War
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
editArticle reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Info Box has several structural errors
editThe info box on this article has several stylistic errors, i.e. brackets, image tags and more. This is more complicated than other info boxes I have dealt with, so I am at a loss as to how to correct the errors. A Softer Answer (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Page moved: it is very clear where this is going, so I won't raise the issue of soldiers from the Caucasus participating in the US Civil War. Ground Zero | t 17:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Georgia (U.S. state) in the American Civil War → Georgia in the American Civil War – Disambiguator is unnecessary here because no one will reasonably expect this to be an article on anything but the U.S. state of Georgia. In the context of the American Civil War, this is the clear primary Georgia. This is also consistent with other titles relating to Georgia in U.S. history, such as Trustee Georgia and Georgia in the American Revolution. bd2412 T 14:47, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support, top points for nominations, Gregkaye ✍♪ 17:56, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support - Seems logical.--Yaksar (let's chat) 18:07, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support - per nom. Rjensen (talk) 18:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support - logical name convention ... GELongstreet (talk) 19:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support. Nom's argument makes sense. Egsan Bacon (talk) 23:37, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support there is no reason for anyone to assume that the country of the same name was involved in this war.--69.157.252.247 (talk) 00:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Snow Support. No need for a parenthetical disambiguator in this article title; the rest of the article title is a natural disambiguator (per WP:NCDAB). Since this pagespace has been moved and moved back previously, User:Hmains might have better served the community by creating a requested move discussion like this one prior to the last move. It appears consensus doesn't agree with that editor's reasoning given in edit summary, "standard name convention for such articles". BusterD (talk) 01:21, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- comment I changed the article name to match its parent category name, Category:Georgia (U.S. state) in the American Civil War and other subcategories within that parent category. This discussion makes no mention of this category situation and is thus incomplete and misleading. And we all know that the category names, with (U.S. state) in them, will not change: all requests to change any of them are repeatedly rejected. Why insist on having a main article of a category not match the category name? What is the benefit here to the WP reader? Hmains (talk) 01:35, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- I'll bow to Hmains's more extensive history with the naming issue here. However, since recently there was a rather spirited discussion in CFD (a process I follow on an irregular basis), I would have liked to have been made aware of it in this space, by edit summary or talk page entry. I see good points on both sides. For my part, I find the criteria at WP:NAMING leads me to prefer NOT having the disambiguator in this pagespace, consistency being a lower priority (IMHO) than conciseness, naturalness, and precision. We may need to host a larger discussion, since this process so far is quite one-sided. BusterD (talk) 02:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- It is common to drop disambiguators or otherwise use shorter forms for titles on subtopics where there is little chance for ambiguity. See, for example:
- Madonna (entertainer), but Madonna bibliography
- Usher (entertainer), but Usher discography
- Brandy Norwood, but Brandy discography and List of songs recorded by Brandy
- Hillary Rodham Clinton but Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2008
- Wolverine (character) but Wolverine in other media
- and of course Georgia (U.S. state), but Georgia in the American Revolution.
- bd2412 T 03:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Also, by the way, this extends to distinctions between articles and their containing categories. For example, Category:Madonna (entertainer) concert tours is the category, but the lead article is List of Madonna concert tours. Cheers! bd2412 T 15:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- It is common to drop disambiguators or otherwise use shorter forms for titles on subtopics where there is little chance for ambiguity. See, for example:
- I'll bow to Hmains's more extensive history with the naming issue here. However, since recently there was a rather spirited discussion in CFD (a process I follow on an irregular basis), I would have liked to have been made aware of it in this space, by edit summary or talk page entry. I see good points on both sides. For my part, I find the criteria at WP:NAMING leads me to prefer NOT having the disambiguator in this pagespace, consistency being a lower priority (IMHO) than conciseness, naturalness, and precision. We may need to host a larger discussion, since this process so far is quite one-sided. BusterD (talk) 02:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Strong support and also move the category Red Slash 20:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support Per nom and later explanation by nom. (I would not quarrel with BusterD's comment.) Donner60 (talk) 01:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support and WP:Speedy close/move. --В²C ☎ 07:40, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support. Whilst I believe Georgia usually does require disambiguation on Wikipedia this is a clear case of where it does not. Zarcadia (talk) 12:45, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Since the contribution of the area of Russia (as it was then) to the ACW was doubtless negligible at best! Disambiguation for dogma's sake is pointless and makes Wikipedia look daft. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:21, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
New lede 22/12/15
editI realise that my new lede does not entirely summarise the main article. But the earlier one didn’t either, and I feel that the new one summarises the topic better, so it might be the main article that needs to be edited accordingly. Valetude (talk) 11:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 7 external links on Georgia in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://civilwarcauses.org/reasons.htm
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/civil-war-overview/why-non-slaveholding.html
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.americanheritage.com/content/south%E2%80%99s-inner-civil-war-0
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.americanheritage.com/content/south%E2%80%99s-inner-civil-war-0
- Attempted to fix sourcing for https://books.google.com/books?id=N48LAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA97&lpg=PA97&dq=%22howell+cobb%22+%22soldiers+of+slaves%22&source=bl&ots=kxO5xZwwr3&sig=HV6CCacydzUmjOpdEhjJ3uKR8rU&hl=en&ei=d8fETLXiB4G0lQfN9IEG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result#v=onepage&q=%22howell%20cobb%22%20%22soldiers%20of%20slaves%22&f=false
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://deadconfederates.com/2015/01/08/real-confederates-didnt-know-about-black-confederates-2/
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://cwmemory.com/2015/01/07/the-most-pernicious-idea-150-years-later
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Georgia in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060724050759/http://www.gmrdc.org/docs/planning/rabun_county_plan/Chapter%207%20-%20Historic%20Cultural.pdf to http://www.gmrdc.org/docs/planning/rabun_county_plan/Chapter%207%20-%20Historic%20Cultural.pdf
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5QVXNUZmW?url=http://www.westegg.com/inflation/ to http://www.westegg.com/inflation/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Georgia in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19980128034930/http://sunsite.utk.edu/civil-war/reasons.html to http://sunsite.utk.edu/civil-war/reasons.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)