Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Talk:Dil Dhadakne Do/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Ssven2 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 17:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


I will review this article. Thank you.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 17:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit
  • "Akhtar, an avid observer," — Looks like praise. Best to remove it for neutrality's sake even if Akhtar's an avid observer or not.
  • "was partly fiction and partly a fictionalised version of people around her," — repetition of "partly" and "fiction/fictionalised" in the same sentence and at close proximity to each other. Do tweak it.

Aside from a few minor issues which I myself dealt with, the article looks good enough for meeting the GA criteria. Once these comments are addressed, the article is promoted.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 07:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Krish is still active as of yesterday, so I'd leave these to him. But I'd suggest he remove the character names from the plot section to avoid bloating the plot, and overlinking. ----Kailash29792 (talk) 08:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
    Pass or Fail:  

Thank you for addressing my comments, Krish!, and congratulations. The article is promoted.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 13:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply