Talk:Digitaria iburua

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image is of the wrong species

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The image in this article is not Digitaria iburua but rather some other grass, probably a species of Setaria, which might have been growing as a weed by the D. iburua sign in the botanical garden where it was photographed. The Digitaria compacta article has the same issue and its image comes from the same location and photographer. I have found an image of a preserved specimen of this species from the Kew herbarium which appears to be under a CC license (https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:398884-1/images), but I don't know if or how I can add it to Wikimedia Commons and/or this article. I would appreciate help from a more experienced Wikipedian. 35.23.57.41 (talk) 17:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic