Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Talk:Cy Twombly

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 96.38.160.52 in topic Lexington High School/Darlington School?

Kissing a painting

edit

I added this news and the arrest. --Juanatoledo 08:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Twombly is notorious for producing meaningless scribble that looks like a hamfisted parody of a style that was already looking dated decades ago. But what can you do? He is recognised by some of his peers, and so he should be treated respectfully on Wikipedia. Perhaps a couple of quotes from reputable critics would be in order (negative and positive), simply to demonstrate the divergence of views. Patrick Neylan 20:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Funny, I can't find any negative critics online — even Google is helpless. How can that be? Anyone making a all-white canvas for $2m should have its critics. Solian en (talk) 15:26, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
The Emperor's clothes are magnificent.108.24.200.163 (talk) 18:32, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Da'tanshay WilliamsReply
The king is in the altogether - The_Emperor's_New_Clothes
"The Emperor's New Clothes" (Danish: Kejserens nye klæder) is a short tale written by Danish author Hans Christian Andersen, about two weavers who promise an emperor a new suit of clothes that they say is invisible to those who are unfit for their positions, stupid, or incompetent – while in reality, they make no clothes at all, making everyone believe the clothes are invisible to them. When the emperor parades before his subjects in his new "clothes", no one dares to say that they do not see any suit of clothes on him for fear that they will be seen as stupid. Finally a child cries out, "But he isn't wearing anything at all!"

Copyvio?

edit

Trying to determine if some of the copy here is copyvio (some prose in question). There are lots of hits for very similar phrases. Of note is this. Any insight is appreciated. ./zro (⠠⠵) 02:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

"copyvio"? Is that Wikispeak for something? Is there a reason why English isn't used? It would then be intelligible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.0.167 (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Absolutely right. There is no such word as 'copyvio' and anyone who thinks that there is shouldn't be contributing to an encyclopaedia. I know that Wikipedia is more of a community mish-mash than an actual encyclopaedia but it should still have standards of basic literacy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.56.70 (talk) 20:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sexuality

edit

I am hesitant to add any references to Twombly's homosexuality, but it seems a bit inconsistent to discuss Twombly's romantic involvement with Robert Rauschenberg on the Rauschenberg page and completely ignore it here, particularly because the two artists became sexually involved before Rauscenberg's divorce. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.89.116 (talk) 21:16, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Added reference with citation. AV3000 (talk) 16:47, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
So which sneaky person has removed the reference, without explanation? Suggest it is reinstated forthwith, for the reasons originally given. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.0.167 (talk) 18:55, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Eh? See Work section: "he became a prominent figure among a group of artists including Robert Rauschenberg – with whom he had a relationship[10]". AV3000 (talk) 23:53, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Any photographs of him In flagrante delicto? Any public statements by Twombly regarding this topic? Any reliable witnesses? Just another baseless Wikipedia innuendo?98.110.67.68 (talk) 22:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)The Honourable Ronald AdairReply

Whence the name Twombly?

edit

Does anyone have info about the idiosyncratic family name "Twombly" -- especially where it comes from? Thanks, Maikel (talk) 15:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

And can somebody who knows please add to the page how to pronounce it? "Two" like "tomb"? So like "womb" or like "Womble"? The last part like "crumbly"? "b" silent or pronounced? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.113.106.24 (talk) 20:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Cy Twombly exhibition at MOMA.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Cy Twombly exhibition at MOMA.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 18:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Twomblypaint.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Twomblypaint.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Art Market - the November 12, 2014 auction

edit

Last night I happened to watch the video documenting the auction sale of November 12, 2014 at Christie's. I thought it was interesting enough to be added as a footnote link to the reference of that record sale in the Art Market paragraph. Thus, because, to my mind, watching it you get the distinct impression that people who attended that auction felt they were witnessing something special (maybe even somewhat unexpected). Unfortunately, my modest editing was swiftly undo, and without any comment. So, instead of starting some sort of editing battle, I shall post the link here, so others could consider whether it can be added back as a footnote link to the main article. Michal. http://www.christies.com/features/In-The-Saleroom-Cy-Twomblys-Untitled-5230-3.aspx

--93.173.139.93 (talk) 02:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Cy Twombly/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

of COURSE its art, and its good art. just look around. man i thought the days of "anyone can do it" (pollock) were behind us.

Last edited at 13:53, 23 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 12:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Cy Twombly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cy Twombly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cy Twombly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://magazine.art21.org/2011/08/12/ink-twombly%E2%80%99s-poetics-in-print/#.YQmMAo5Kj3R. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 18:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

More at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Smokyhallow. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Lexington High School/Darlington School?

edit

There's no source for the claim Twombly graduated from Lexington High School. I was able to find one, but didn't add it, because it doesn't make sense to me that he only then attended the Darlington School, which is a k-12 college prep school. I think it's an unusual enough claim to require some clarification. 96.38.160.52 (talk) 16:36, 27 December 2022 (UTC)Reply