Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Talk:Athar Minallah

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Dubious article

edit

This seems to be a rather dubious and poorly written and referenced article, possibly written by the subject or someone close to the subject. It contains many self-promotory words and sentences and reads like fan mail more than anything else. Also, very bizarrely, it contains more material about the purported family history/background of this subject rather than material about the subject himself. Almost all of this information is of a 'peacock' nature and totally unreferenced. I would strongly recommend that this article either be rewritten entirely in a brief, clear and objective way, with an adequate number of acceptable/reliable references; or else, simply be deleted. Thank you 39.54.207.44 (talk) 02:13, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Col retd Mumtaz Khan, Abbottabad, Hazara, NWFP, PakistanReply

Quite right. I am now taking the initiative and removing all the material herein that is dubious and/or unreferenced, or untrustworthy; and only leaving basic, referenced material. AsadUK200 (talk) 17:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)AsadUK200Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Athar Minallah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply