Ranally city rating system

The Ranally city rating system is a tool developed by Rand McNally & Co. to classify U.S. cities based on their economic function. The system is designed to reflect an underlying hierarchy whereby consumers and businesses go to a city of a certain size for a certain function; some functions are widely available and others are only available in the largest cities.

The system was developed for Rand McNally by geographer Richard L. Forstall and released in 1964. The city rankings are updated periodically in the Rand McNally Commercial Atlas and Marketing Guide, an annual two-volume set, which is available in many libraries. Among the criteria for categorization are retail sales, newspaper circulation, and the presence of universities and hospitals and corporate headquarters. The size of the city's tributary area is critical to determining whether it will be rated a 2, 3, or 4. As of 2006, there are 1492 cities rated.

The system consists of a number and a letter. The number reflects a city's importance in the national hierarchy. Nationally important business centers are ranked 1. Regional business centers are ranked 2. Significant local business centers are ranked 3 and business centers whose importance is purely local are ranked 4. the letter reflects its importance in its own area. Doubled letters serve to distinguish centers within a class. The most important center in a market (trading area) is given some kind of A. Other business centers in the same market area will be given B or C depending on their importance. For example, Dallas is rated 1-AA (a nationally important business center) and Fort Worth is rated 2-BB. B cities constitute basic trading centers, while C cities do not.

Rand McNally divides the country into basic trading areas (487 as of 2008), each of which has exactly one A-rated city. The basic trading areas are aggregated into major trading areas, of which there are 51. The Federal Communications Commission uses these areas for determining wireless territory boundaries.^[1]

New York City has always been given the unique rating 1-AAAA due to its preeminent status in the national hierarchy. Chicago was originally the only other city rated 1-AAA as having influence over a large area of the country. In 1988, Los Angeles was similarly given a 1-AAA rating. Thirteen cities are given the rating 1-AA as major national business centers: Atlanta, Boston, Cleveland, Dallas, Detroit, Houston, Miami, Minneapolis, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C.

Ranally city rating	Description	Examples (* indicates a complete listing)
1-AAAA	Unique rating for New York	New York City*
1-AAA	Unique rating for Chicago and Los Angeles	Chicago, Los Angeles*
1-AA	Major national business centers	Atlanta, Boston, Cleveland, Dallas, Detroit, Houston, Miami, Minneapolis, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. (13 cities)*
1-A	Other national business centers	Baltimore, Cincinnati, Columbus, Denver, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Milwaukee, New Orleans, Oklahoma City, Phoenix, Portland, San Antonio, San Diego, and Seattle (14 cities)*
2-AA	Major regional business centers	Albany, Albuquerque, Allentown, Austin, Baton Rouge, Birmingham, Buffalo, Charlotte, Columbia, Dayton, Des Moines, El Paso, Grand Rapids, Harrisburg, Hartford, Honolulu, Jackson, Jacksonville, Knoxville, Las Vegas, Lexington, Little Rock, Louisville, Madison, Memphis, Nashville, New Haven, Norfolk, Omaha, Orlando, Peoria, Providence, Raleigh, Richmond, Rochester, NY, Sacramento, Salt Lake City, Shreveport, Spokane, Springfield, MA, Syracuse, Tampa, Toledo, Tucson, Tulsa, West Palm Beach, Wichita, and Youngstown (48 cities)*
2-BB	Secondary major regional business centers	Akron, Fort Lauderdale, Fort Worth, Oakland, St. Paul, St. Petersburg, San Jose, Wilmington, DE (8 cities)*
2-CC	Same as 2-BB, but not constituting a basic trading center	Newark*
2-A	Other regional business centers	Amarillo, Anchorage, Augusta, GA, Bakersfield, Beaumont, Canton, Charleston, SC, Charleston, WV, Chattanooga, Colorado Springs, Corpus Christi, Davenport, Daytona Beach, Erie, Eugene, Evansville, Fayetteville, NC, Flint, Fort Myers, Fort Wayne, Fresno, Green Bay, Greensboro, Greenville, SC, Huntington, WV, Kalamazoo, Lafayette, LA, Lancaster, PA, Lansing, Lubbock, McAllen, Melbourne, Mobile, Modesto, Montgomery, Pensacola, Portland, ME, Reading, Reno, Roanoke, Rockford, Saginaw, Salem, OR, Sarasota, Savannah, Scranton, South Bend, Springfield, IL, Springfield, MO, Stockton, Worcester (51 cities)*
2-B	Secondary regional business centers	Clearwater, Newport News, Tacoma, Trenton, Virginia Beach, and Winston-Salem (6 cities)*
2-C	Same as 2-B, but not constituting a basic trading center	Ann Arbor, Bridgeport, Riverside, and San Bernardino (4 cities)*
2-S	Suburbs analogous to 2-C cities	Anaheim, Arlington, Costa Mesa, Dearborn, Hialeah, Hollywood, FL, Long Beach (the largest city classified by Rand McNally as a suburb), Mesa, Paramus, Pasadena, Santa Ana, Southfield, MI, Stamford, Torrance, Troy, MI, White Plains (16 suburbs)*
3-AA	Major significant local business centers	Abilene, TX, Albany, GA, Alexandria, LA, Altoona, PA, Appleton, WI, Asheville, NC, Atlantic City, NJ, Bangor, ME, Billings, MT, Biloxi, MS, Binghamton, NY, Bloomington, IL, Boise, ID, Brownsville, TX, Burlington, VT, Cedar Rapids, IA, Champaign, IL, Charlottesville, VA, Columbus, GA, Decatur, IL, Duluth, MN, Eau Claire, WI, Elmira, NY, Fargo, ND, Florence, AL, Fort Smith, AR, Gainesville, FL, Huntsville, AL, Jackson, MI, Johnstown, PA, Kingsport, TN, La Crosse, WI, Lafayette, IN, Lake Charles, LA, Lakeland, FL, Laredo, TX, Lawton, OK, Lima, OH, Lincoln, NE, Longview, TX, Lynchburg, VA, Macon, GA, Manchester, NH, Mansfield, OH, Medford, OR, Midland, TX, Monroe, LA, Muncie, IN, Muskegon, MI, New London, CT, Ocala, FL, Odessa, TX, Parkersburg, WV, Poughkeepsie, NY, Provo, UT, Pueblo, CO, Rochester, MN, St. Joseph, MO, Salinas, CA, San Angelo, TX, Santa Barbara, CA, Sioux City, IA, Sioux Falls, SD, Tallahassee, FL, Terre Haute, IN, Texarkana, TX, Topeka, KS, Tuscaloosa, AL, Tyler, TX, Utica, NY, Visalia, CA, Waco, TX, Waterloo, IA, Wheeling, WV, Wichita Falls, TX, Wilmington, NC, Yakima, WA, and York, PA (78 cities)*
3-BB	Secondary major significant local business centers	Durham, NC, Fall River, MA, Gastonia, NC, Hampton, VA, New Bedford, MA, Niagara Falls, NY, Monterey, CA, Ogden, UT, Pawtucket, RI, Schenectady, NY, Spartanburg, SC, Springfield, OH, Waterbury, CT, and Wilkes-Barre, PA (14 cities)*
3-CC	Same as 3-BB, but not constituting a basic trading center	Boulder, CO, Everett, WA, Oxnard, CA, Racine, WI, Santa Rosa, CA, Ventura, CA, and Warwick, RI (7 cities)*
3-SS	Suburbs analogous to 3-CC cities	Alexandria, VA, Arlington, VA, Aurora, CO, Aurora, IL, Bellevue, WA, Beverly Hills, CA, Bloomington, MN, Brockton, MA, Burlington, MA, Cambridge, MA, Cherry Hill, NJ, Concord, CA, Danbury, CT, Edina, MN, El Cajon, CA, Fairfax, VA, Framingham, MA, Fremont, CA, Fullerton, CA, Glendale, CA, Greensburg, PA, Hackensack, NJ, Hayward, CA, Huntington Beach, CA, Jersey City, NJ, Joliet, IL, Kansas City, KS, Lakewood, CO, Lawrence, MA, Livonia, MI, Lowell, MA, Mountain View, CA, Newport Beach, CA, Newton, MA, Norwalk, CT, Orange, CA, Overland Park, KS, Palo Alto, CA, Pomona, CA, Pontiac, MI, Rockville, MD, San Leandro, CA, San Mateo, CA, Schaumburg, IL, Scottsdale, AZ, Santa Monica, CA, Skokie, IL, Sterling Heights, MI, Vancouver, WA, Walnut Creek, CA, Warren, MI, Waukegan, IL, Wayne, NJ, Woodbridge, NJ, and Yonkers, NY (55 suburbs)*
3-A	Other significant local business centers	Athens, GA, Anderson, IN, Cheyenne, WY, Fond du Lac, WI, Fort Pierce, FL, Grand Forks, ND, Hagerstown, MD, Redding, CA (200 cities)
3-B	Secondary significant local business centers	Meriden, CT, Fitchburg, MA, Johnson City, TN, Port Arthur, TX (58 cities)
3-C	Same as 3-B, but not constituting a basic trading center	Ames, IA, Rock Hill, SC, Troy, NY (51 cities)
3-S	Suburbs analogous to 3-C cities	Arlington Heights, IL, Chula Vista, CA, Edison, NJ, Midwest City, OK, New Rochelle, NY, North Charleston, SC, Somerville, MA, Wyoming, MI (180 suburbs)
4-A	Other local business centers	Sierra Vista, AZ, Bemidji, MN, Kalispell, MT, Rolla, MO (79 cities)
4-B	Secondary local business centers	Cedar Falls, IA, Kearney, NE, Springdale, AR, Urbana, IL (90 cities)
4-C	Same as 4-B, but not constituting a basic trading center	Carson City, NV, Conway, AR, DeKalb, IL, Dover, NH, Lodi, CA (155 cities)
4-S	Suburbs analogous to 4-C cities	Carrollton, TX, Compton, CA, Hillsboro, OR, Kirkland, WA, Mount Vernon, NY, West Haven, CT (361 suburbs)

Notes: The B and C cities are secondary because they are in the same market area as a city rated A.

While those are only abstract examples of the ratings, consider how the system works in practice with the example of Ohio. Rand McNally conceives of Ohio as consisting of nineteen markets (trading areas) with some peripheral counties being contained in trading areas of other states. The table below shows the nineteen trading areas in order of hierarchy. Each has an A-rated city. Some also have other rated cities and suburbs.

Example: Ohio

Trading area	A-rated city	Other cities	Suburbs
Cleveland-Akron	Cleveland (1-AA)	Akron (2-BB), Wooster (3-C)	Elyria, Euclid, Lorain, Mentor, Middleburg Heights, Parma (all 3-S), Barberton, Beachwood, Bedford, Brooklyn, Cleveland Heights, Cuyahoga Falls, Fairlawn, Kent, Lakewood, Mayfield Heights, Medina, North Olmsted, Painesville, Ravenna, Richmond Heights, Willoughby (all 4-S)
Cincinnati	Cincinnati (1-A)	Hamilton (3-C), Middletown (3-C), Maysville, KY (4-C)	Florence, KY, Springdale,(both 3-S), Covington, KY, Fairfield, Newport, KY (all 4-S)
Columbus	Columbus (1-A)	Delaware, Lancaster, Newark (all 3-C), Mount Vernon (4-C)	Upper Arlington, Whitehall (both 4-S)
Dayton-Springfield	Dayton (2-AA)	Springfield (3-BB), Bellefontaine, Celina, Greenville, Piqua, Troy (all 4-C),	Trotwood, Xenia (both 4-S)
Toledo	Toledo (2-AA)	Bowling Green, Fremont (both 4-C)	Maumee (4-S)
Youngstown-Warren	Youngstown (2-AA)	Warren (3-B)	Niles (3-S)
Canton-New Philadelphia	Canton (2-A)	New Philadelphia (3-B), Dover (3-C), Alliance (4-C), Coshocton (4-C), Massillon (4-C)
Lima	Lima (3-AA)
Mansfield	Mansfield (3-AA)	Ashland (4-C)	Ontario (4-S)
Ashtabula	Ashtabula (3-A)
Chillicothe	Chillicothe (3-A)
Findlay-Tiffin	Findlay (3-A)	Tiffin (4-B)
Marion	Marion (3-A)
Portsmouth	Portsmouth (3-A)
Sandusky	Sandusky (3-A)
Steubenville-Weirton	Steubenville (3-A)	Weirton, WV (4-B)
Zanesville-Cambridge	Zanesville (3-A)	Cambridge (4-B)
Athens	Athens (4-A)
East Liverpool-Salem	East Liverpool (4-A)	Salem (4-B)

The system is applied by businesses seeking to serve a network of customers with the greatest efficiency. For example, a company that services elevators or a wholesaler of paper bags would want to locate its field representatives primarily in A rated cities. The Rural Health Research Center at the University of Minnesota published a report in 2008 on access to physicians in rural areas which uses the system to evaluate access to physicians in rural areas.^[2]

References

Rand McNally Commercial Atlas and Marketing Guide, 136th edition, 2005, Skokie, Ill.: Rand McNally. A complete description of the system is found at Volume 1, pp. 7–8, and rosters of the ratings appear on pp. 74–87 and 129–131.
Richard L. Forstall, ed. Rand McNally city rating guide: a completely new concept in analyzing markets and planning sales and advertising programs in the 1090 principal business centers of the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964.

^ http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/maps/mta.pdf ^{[bare URL PDF]}
^ Ira Moscovice, et al., "Options for Increasing the Supply of Primary Care Physicians in Rural Minnesota," Rural Health Research Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, January 2008, "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-20. Retrieved 2008-02-28.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

[1] ttp://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/maps/mta.pdf ^{[bare URL PDF]}

[2] Ira Moscovice, et al., "Options for Increasing the Supply of Primary Care Physicians in Rural Minnesota," Rural Health Research Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, January 2008, "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-20. Retrieved 2008-02-28.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

[1]

[2]

Ranally city rating system

See also

References