Institutional syndrome

In Europe and North America, the trend of putting the mentally ill into mental hospitals began as early as the 17th century,^{[4][unreliable source?]} and hospitals often focused more on "restraining" or controlling inmates than on curing them,^[5] although hospital conditions improved somewhat with movements for human treatment, such as moral management. By the mid-20th century, overcrowding in institutions,^{[6][7][unreliable source?]} the failure of institutional treatment to cure most mental illnesses,^[6] and the advent of drugs such as Thorazine^[7] prompted many hospitals to begin discharging patients in large numbers, in the beginning of the deinstitutionalization movement (the process of gradually moving people from inpatient care in mental hospitals, to outpatient care).

Deinstitutionalization did not always result in better treatment, however, and in many ways it helped reveal some of the shortcomings of institutional care, as discharged patients were often unable to take care of themselves, and many ended up homeless or in jail.^[8] In other words, many of these patients had become "institutionalized" and were unable to adjust to independent living. One of the first studies to address the issue of institutionalization directly was British psychiatrist Russell Barton's 1959 book Institutional Neurosis,^[9] which claimed that many symptoms of mental illness (specifically, psychosis) were not physical brain defects as once thought, but were consequences of institutions' "stripping" (a term probably first used in this context by Erving Goffman^[10]) away the "psychological crutches" of their patients.

Since the middle of the 20th century, the problem of institutionalization has been one of the motivating factors for the increasing popularity of deinstitutionalization and the growth of community mental health services,^[2][11] since some mental healthcare providers believe that institutional care may create as many problems as it solves.

Romanian children who suffered from severe neglect at a young age were adopted by families. Research reveals that the post-institutional syndrome occurring in these children gave rise to symptoms of autistic behavior. Studies done on eight Romanian adoptees living in the Netherlands revealed that about one third of the children exhibited behavioral and communication problems resembling that of autism.^[12]

Individuals who suffer from institutional syndrome can face several kinds of difficulties upon returning to the community. The lack of independence and responsibility for patients within institutions, along with the 'depressing'^[6] and 'dehumanizing'^[7] environment, can make it difficult for patients to live and work independently. Furthermore, the experience of being in an institution may often have exacerbated individuals' illness: proponents of labeling theory claim that individuals who are socially "labeled" as mentally ill suffer stigmatization and alienation that lead to psychological damage and a lessening of self-esteem, and thus that being placed in a mental health institution can actually cause individuals to become more mentally ill.^[13][14]

• Grob, Gerald N (1994), The Mad Among Us: A History of the Care of America's Mentally Ill, New York: The Free Press, ISBN 9781439105719
• Leite, Ligia Costa; Schmid, Patricia C. (2004), "Institutionalization and Psychological Suffering: Notes on the Mental Health of Institutionalized Adolescents in Brazil", Transcultural Psychiatry, 41 (2): 281–293, doi:10.1177/1363461504043569, PMID 15446725, S2CID 45149015
• Shorter, Edward (1997), A History of Psychiatry: From the Era of the Asylum to the Age of Prozac, New York: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 9780471245315
• "Solving Mental Health Problems", Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope, The World Health Report, World Health Organization, 2001
• Williams, Stephen M. (1994), Environment and Mental Health, New York: John Wiley & Sons