Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Wikipedia

Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement

The Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (IRSSA; French: Convention de règlement relative aux pensionnats indiens, CRRPI[1]) is an agreement between the government of Canada and approximately 86,000 Indigenous peoples in Canada who at some point were enrolled as children in the Canadian Indian residential school system, a system which was in place between 1879 and 1997.[2][3]: 1  The IRSSA recognized the damage inflicted by the residential schools and established a C$1.9-billion compensation package called CEP (Common Experience Payment) for all former IRS students.[4][5] The agreement, announced in 2006, was the largest class action settlement in Canadian history.[3]: 1 

As of March 2016, a total of C$1,622,422,106 has been paid to 79,309 former students.[6] An additional C$3.18 billion has been paid out to 31,103 former students as of March 31, 2019, through IAPs (Independent Assessment Process) which are for damages suffered beyond the norm for the IRS.[6] The average IAP payment is $111,265 (including legal costs), and the average CEP payment is $20,457.[6]

Indian residential schools

edit
Main article: Indian residential schools

Indian residential schools were a network of "boarding schools" for Native Canadians (First Nations or "Indians"; Métis and Inuit). These schools operated in all Canadian provinces and territories except Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador.[7]

The first school opened in 1828, and the last one closed in 1997.[8][9][10] The last school to close was Kivalliq Hall in Rankin Inlet, in what is now Nunavut; it became a IRSSA-recognized school in 2019 following a court ruling, which is why earlier accounts describe the last school closing in 1996.[7]

Funded by the Canadian government's Indian Affairs and Northern Development, and administered by Christian churches, predominantly the Roman Catholic Church in Canada (60%), but also the Anglican Church of Canada (30%), and the United Church of Canada, including its pre-1925 constituent church predecessors (10%).[11] The policy was to remove children from the influence of their families and culture and assimilate them into the dominant Canadian culture.[12] Over the course of the system's existence, approximately 30% of native children, roughly some 150,000, were placed in residential schools nationally.[13]

History of the IRSSA

edit

In November 1996, the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) issued its final 4,000-page report with 440 recommendations. Indian residential schools were the topic of one chapter.[4] In 1998 in response to the RCAP the Canadian federal government unveiled Gathering Strength: Canada's Aboriginal Action Plan,[14]: 3  a "long-term, broad-based policy approach in response to the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples which included the "Statement of Reconciliation: Learning from the Past," in which the "Government of Canada recognizes and apologizes to those who experienced physical and sexual abuse at Indian residential schools and acknowledges its role in the development and administration of residential schools."[15]

In 2001, the federal Office of Indian Residential Schools Resolution Canada was created to manage and resolve the large number of abuse claims filed by former students against the federal government. In 2004, an Assembly of First Nations Report on Canada’s Dispute Resolution Plan to Compensate for Abuses in Indian Residential Schools led to discussions to develop a holistic, fair and lasting resolution of the legacy of Indian Residential Schools.[16]

The law firm of Regina, Saskatchewan lawyer, Tony Merchant, Q.C.—Merchant Law Group LLP—represented over 7,000 survivors—approximately 50 per cent of "all known" residential school survivors in Canada "who had pursued class action lawsuits" against the Canadian federal government .[17] Following the publication of the 1996 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples report, residential school survivors met across the country at gatherings, also attended by Tony Merchant, who became a "familiar figure", signing up thousands of survivors for a class action law suit.[18] MLG lawyers received "nothing until a class action settlement was secured" in a legal fees agreement that was settlement-driven.[18] David Blott's Calgary, Alberta-based law firm "handled almost 4,600 residential school claims."[19]

On November 20, 2005, an agreement in principle was reached by the negotiating parties which included Canada, as represented by Frank Iacobucci, a retired Supreme Court of Canada Justice, the plaintiffs' representative—the National Consortium and the Merchant Law Group (MLG), independent Counsel, the Assembly of First Nations, Inuit representatives, the General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada, the Presbyterian Church in Canada, the United Church of Canada, and Roman Catholic Entities for the "resolution of the legacy of Indian Residential Schools."[20]

On 23 November 2005 the Canadian federal government announced the IRSSA compensation package.[4] It represents the largest class-action lawsuit in Canadian history. On 11 June 2008, Prime Minister Harper "apologized on behalf of the Government of Canada, and all Canadians, for the forcible removal of Aboriginal children from their homes and communities to attend Indian residential schools. In this historic Apology, the Prime Minister recognized that there is no room in Canada for the attitudes that created the residential school system to prevail."[21]

In Regina, Saskatchewan, on December 15, 2006, Justice Dennis Ball, approved the "settlement of class and individual residential school claims" under the IRSSA.[22]

Components of the IRSSA

edit

The agreement was signed on May 8, 2006,[20] with implementation on September 19, 2007.[23]

Federal government contributions

edit

The five main components of the IRSSA provided by the federal government were the Common Experience Payment (CEP), Independent Assessment Process (IAP), the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), Commemoration, and Health and Healing Services.[5]

Common Experience Payment (CEP)

edit

The IRSSA offered former students blanket compensation through the Common Experience Payment (CEP) with an average lump-sum payment of C$28,000. The CEP, a component of the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, totaling C$1.9 billion, was "part of an overall holistic and comprehensive response to the Indian residential school legacy." Payments were higher for more serious cases of abuse.[3]: 1 [24] The CEP recognized "the experience of living at an Indian Residential School(s) and its impacts. All former students who resided at a recognized Indian Residential School(s) and were alive on May 30, 2005 were eligible for the CEP. This include[d] First Nations, Métis, and Inuit former students."[5] This initial payment for each person who attended a residential school amounted to C$10,000 per person plus C$3,000 per year.[4] The application deadline for CEP was 19 September 2011 with some exceptions made until September 19, 2012. By 31 December 2012, "a total of 105,540 applications were received under the common experience payment. C$1.62 billion was paid to "78,750 recipients, representing 98% of the 80,000 estimated eligible former students."[6]

Independent Assessment Process

edit

The IRSSA allotted C$960 million to the Independent Assessment Process (IAP), "a settlement fund for claims of sexual abuses, serious physical abuse and other wrongful acts" at IRS which "provides money to those who experienced serious physical and/or sexual abuse at an Indian Residential School (...) The maximum payment is C$275,000, but an additional C$250,000 may be awarded for claims of actual income loss."[25] By 31 December 2012, over C$1.7 billion in total was issued through the IAP. around three times more applications were received than expected, and the IAP is forecast to continue hearings until around 2017. By 2011 there were already 29,000 claims, double the 12,500 originally estimated by the IRSSA and this number was expected to rise even more. Violent abuse was "rampant, not isolated." According to Dan Ish, Indian Residential School Adjudication Secretariat chief adjudicator for the IAP, estimated in 2012 that IAP claims would be somewhere between two and three billion dollars more than anticipated.[26]

The fate of the records documenting over 38,000 IAP claims was placed in front of Canadian courts.[27] The Supreme Court of Canada decided that on September 19, 2027 all records generated through IAP will be destroyed unless the Survivor mentioned in the record indicates that they wish the record is preserved.[28] The Supreme Court decision indicated that IAP records can only be requested for preservation by Survivors. Family members are unable to ask for records to be saved, meaning that IAP records of people who have died since the time of their IAP claim and before this process was established, will not be saved.[29]

Indian Residential Schools Truth and Reconciliation Commission

edit
Main article: Indian Residential Schools Truth and Reconciliation Commission

IRSSA allocated C$60 million for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) to document and preserve the experiences of survivors. The Commission was launched 2 June 2008.[30] On 20 October 2008, Justice Harry LaForme, Commission chair resigned, claiming "the commission was on the verge of paralysis and doomed to failure. He cited an "incurable problem" with the other two commissioners — Claudette Dumont-Smith and Jane Brewin Morley — who he said refused to accept his authority as chairman and were disrespectful."[24] On 15 October 2009 the Indian Residential Schools Truth and Reconciliation Commission was relaunched by then-Governor General Michaëlle Jean with Justice Murray Sinclair, an Ojibway-Canadian judge, First Nations lawyer, as the chair.[24][31] By August 2012, the federal government had released over 941,000 documents to the TRC related to residential schools.

Health and Healing Services

edit

On 31 March 1998 in response to the RCAP and as part of Gathering Strength—Canada's Aboriginal Action Plan, the federal government established the Aboriginal Healing Foundation (AHF), an "Aboriginal-managed, national, Ottawa-based, not-for-profit private corporation", with a C$350 million-dollar grant and an eleven-year mandate from March 1998 to March 2009.[32] Its role was "to encourage and support, through research and funding contributions, community-based Aboriginal directed healing initiatives which address the legacy of physical and sexual abuse suffered in Canada’s Indian Residential School System, including inter-generational impacts."[32] In 2007, under the IRSSA, the federal government provided $125 million to the AHF, which was intended to provide five years of funding.[5] Further funding was to come from the money paid by the Catholic entities under section 3.3 of Schedule O-3,[33]: §3.3  of which at least 80% was to be transferred to the AHF.[33]: Schedule C, §5  A court dispute over the amount of money due to the AHF because of this obligation subsequently arose between the government and the Catholic entities.[34]

IRSSA also supported the Resolution Health Support Worker (RHSW) Program.

Commemoration Fund

edit

The IRSSA allocated C$20 million for the Commemoration Fund for national and community commemorative projects. This fund was managed by the TRC and Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada.

Church contributions

edit

The church entities signed agreements to provide financial and in-kind support for healing and reconciliation programs, as outlined in the following table. Compensation payments made prior to the implementation of the IRSSA were credited against these obligations.

Denomination
Presbyterian Anglican Catholic United
IRSSA Schedule O-1[35] O-2[36] O-3[33] O-4[37]
Commitments under prior agreements (replaced by IRSSA commitments) $2,100,000[38]: para. 99  $25,000,000[38]: para. 99 [39][40] — —
Amounts paid out in compensation as of Nov. 20, 2005 and explicitly noted in respective Schedules $227,412[35]: §3.5  $6,699,125[36]: §3.3.1A  Not stated in Schedule O-3 $5,444,420[37]: §4.4 
Cumulative amounts paid out in compensation prior to IRSSA implementation (Sep. 2007) At least $366,894[a] At least $7,698,419[b] $8,344,575[42]: para. 51 [43] ⪆ $5,996,000[c]
Total commitments under IRSSA Maximum $1,317,700[35]: §3.2 [41]: para. 45(a) [d] $15,687,188[36]: §3.3.1 [e] $79,000,000[38]: para. 173(d)  $6,891,170[37]: §4.1 [38]: para. 173(c) 
Minimum $900,700[38]: para. 173(b)  $12,922,800[f] $54,000,000[38]: para. 173(d)  $6,455,020[38]: para. 173(c) 
Components of commitments Credit for previous compensation payments Used in computation of reduced settlement amount of $1,317,700[35]: §3.2 

If amount paid between Nov. 20, 2005 and the IRSSA implementation date in excess of $489,540, Government to pay excess amount for use in settlement fund[35]: §3.6 

$6,699,125 included in total above; further amounts paid between Nov. 20, 2005 and the IRSSA implementation date refunded by Government[36]: §3.4.3  and used as P in formula below Deducted from $29,000,000 cash commitment $5,444,420 credited against the cash and in-kind services obligations[37]: §4.6 ; further amounts paid between Nov. 20, 2005 and the IRSSA implementation date refunded by Government; up to $1,010,600 of any refund to be used for healing and reconciliation grants in accordance with agreement[37]: §4.5 
Cash Total amount above less any amount provided as in-kind services  , where

P is the amount of compensation paid by Anglican Entities between Nov. 20, 2005 and the IRSSA implementation date, and

F is the amount raised by the Catholic fundraising campaign.

Maximum contribution: $4,964,300[36]: §3.4.1,§3.4.3,§3.4.5 

$20,655,425[42]: para. 51 

($29,000,000, less $8,344,575 paid before IRSSA implementation)[33]: §3.3 

$4,710,420 if Catholic fundraising campaign raised over $20 million;

$4,274,270 otherwise[37]: §4.1.1-§4.1.2 

In-kind services Up to $417,000[35]: §3.8.3  $4,023,675[36]: §3.3.2(b)  (cash may be substituted for services)[36]: §3.5.3  $25,000,000[33]: §3.5.1  $2,180,750[37]: §4.1.1 
Fundraising — — 7-year (2007-2014)[g] "best efforts"[h] campaign with target of $25,000,000[33]: §3.9  —
  1. ^ $366,894 had been paid out as of March 2006.[41]: para. 34 [38]: para. 77 
  2. ^ $7,698,419 had been paid out as of February 2006.[41]: para. 29 [38]: para. 84 
  3. ^ Approximately $5,996,000 had been paid out as of March 2006.[41]: para. 36 [38]: para. 80 
  4. ^ The Joint Factum of the Plaintiffs gives a figure of $1,317,000.[38]: para. 173(b) 
  5. ^ $15,687,188 is presented as the result of a computation based on the maximum possible contribution of the Catholic entities: $79,000,000 × 19.8572%. The Factum of the Protestant Church Entities gives a figure of $15,687,100,[41]: para. 42(a)  while the Joint Factum of the Plaintiffs gives a figure of $15,689,100.[38]: para. 173(a)  $6,699,125 + $4,964,300 + $4,023,675 = $15,687,100, not $15,687,188.
  6. ^ For the cash contribution formula, it appears that P reached $2,200,000 by the IRSSA implementation date,[40] giving a minimum total commitment of $2,200,000 + $4,023,675 + $6,699,125 = $12,922,800.
  7. ^ The Catholic entities (not including the Diocese of Saskatoon)[33]: §4.4.1  agreed to "use their best efforts throughout the seven year period following the day after the coming into force of this Agreement"[33]: §3.9 . The IRSSA came into effect on September 19, 2007,[23] setting up the "seven year period" for the fundraising obligation to run from September 2007 to September 2014. In a February 2014 affidavit, AANDC senior analyst Pamela Stellick deposed that the campaign was "to end in 2014".[42]: para. 20 
  8. ^ "Best efforts" would be "deemed to have been made where the fund-raising campaign demonstrates on a Canada-Wide level in each of the seven years an approach and means that is consistent with the approach and means used by professionally managed national fundraising campaigns, including those operated by universities and hospital foundations."[33]: §3.9.1 
edit

Crawford Class Action was the court-appointed administrator.[3]: 1  C$100-million was allocated by IRSSA for the payment of plaintiffs’ legal fees.[26]

Controversies

edit

Conduct of certain lawyers

edit

Dan Ish, upon his retirement from his position as chief adjudicator of IAP, described challenges with private lawyers who allegedly illegally profited from IRSSA benefits. They investigated Winnipeg lawyer Howard Tennenhouse, Calgary lawyer David Blott and Vancouver lawyer Stephen Bronstein and numerous other lawyers. Ish "personally reported Tennenhouse to the Law Society of Manitoba, who eventually disbarred the veteran lawyer and repaid clients nearly a million dollars. A Vancouver judge barred Blott and others he worked with from further IAP work after claimants complained of wrongly being charged loans, fees, penalties and interest-something forbidden under the IAP. In 2013, the IRSAS requested an investigation into Bronstein but settled for a "review" of his practice and alleged connection with a paroled murderer doing IAP intake work."[44] In 2012 the Law Society of Manitoba disbarred Tennenhouse for life. He pleaded guilty to charges and agreed to pay back the "C$950,000 in extra fees" he charged 55 former residential school students.[45][46] In 2014 as the Law Society of Alberta moved to disbar Calgary lawyer, David Blott "accused of misconduct in his handling of settlements awarded to survivors of residential school abuse", Blott resigned.[19] The "investigation into Blott’s action cost taxpayers C$3.5 million."[44] Ivon Johnny, a convicted killer, had his parole revoked in January 2013 after "allegations he threatened and extorted (...) substantial sums of money from vulnerable and in some cases cognitively deficient [IRSSA] claimants. In February 2013 "B.C. Supreme Court Justice Brenda Brown "ordered Bronstein to be interviewed by a court monitor about his alleged dealings with Johnny."[47]

In January 2015, the office of the Attorney General of Canada launched a law suit in the Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan, in Regina, Saskatchewan, on behalf of the Canadian federal government, against Tony Merchant's Regina, Saskatchewan-based Merchant Law Group. Tony Merchant, Q.C., who "is known as the king of class action lawsuits in Canada,"[48][18] and Merchant Law Group LLP had successfully represented about fifty per cent of "all known individuals in Canada pursuing class action lawsuits" against the Canadian federal government as survivors of residential schools.[17] In November 2005, they were part of the negotiating teams that culminated in the multi-billion National Settlement with the Canadian Government−C$1.9 Billion in compensation for Common Experience Payments" and C$3 billion in Independent Assessment Process (IAP) compensation.[17] The 2015 case against MLG was first launched at the Queen's Court, and appealed at the Court of Appeal before it was heard by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2018.[22][49][50][51] The March 15, 2018 ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada rejected MLG's appeal to have the fraud action struck down,[52][53] which means the government of Canada can continue with its damages suit against the law firm.[54]

On August 2, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Merchant Law Group (MLG)'s appeal to retain C$21,310.83 of a residential school survivor’s compensation" for "outstanding legal bills."[55] The survivor's January 2014 C$93,000 IRSSA Independent Assessment Process (IAP) compensation is protected under a 2006 Supreme Court of British Columbia the IRSSA and the Financial Administration Act. Under that Act, lawyers are "expressly forbidden to assign any part of IAP compensation"..."because IAP claimants were considered especially vulnerable."[55] Since 2000, MLG had represented the client and her son. The adjudication secretariat routinely checking IAP files found the deduction for the previous legal bills."[55] When Merchant was told to return the money to the claimant, [55] he appealed to retain the money for legal fees.[55] In October 2020, the Law Society of Saskatchewan announced their decision to suspend Merchant for eight months, saying that because of the woman's vulnerability, Merchant "should have known better" than to use a disrespectful, and intimidating tone with her, compelling her to sign a form authorizing Merchant to retain her IAP claim to pay for "unrelated legal bills owed by her son."[56] The disciplinary panel said the suspension will start in February 2021 and that Merchant must also pay over C$10,000 in costs.[56] According to an October 2, 2020 Regina Leader Post article, MLG submitted a statement of appeal to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal to overturn the disciplinary panel's decision, and to overturn the suspension.[56]

edit
Main article: Fontaine et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., 2015 SKQB 220

In July 2015, the Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan found that the Government of Canada, the Catholic entities party to the IRSSA, and the Corporation of Catholic Entities Party to the IRSSA (CCEPIRSS) had reached "an enforceable settlement of all issues between these parties relating to CCEPIRSS' obligations under the Settlement Agreement."[34] The case became controversial because The Globe and Mail, and subsequently CBC News, claimed that the decision had enabled the Catholic entities to escape one or more of their IRSSA obligations that allegedly had not been met. Canadian Catholic authorities have maintained that all the obligations were met.

The government began an appeal of the judgment, then dropped it; this decision became a further topic of controversy because their reason for not pursuing the appeal remained obscure for years. Documents released under the Access to Information Act in 2022 revealed that the government had concluded that an appeal would be unlikely to succeed.

See also

edit

Citations

edit
  1. ^ Marshall, Tabitha (July 11, 2013). "Convention de règlement relative aux pensionnats indiens". The Canadian Encyclopedia (in French). Retrieved June 3, 2021.
  2. ^ "Your questions answered about Canada's residential school system". CBC News. June 4, 2021.
  3. ^ a b c d "Personal Credits for Personal or Group Education Services" (PDF), Assembly of First Nations, 2014, archived from the original (PDF) on 13 March 2016, retrieved 4 June 2015
  4. ^ a b c d "A timeline of residential schools, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission", CBC News, 16 May 2008, retrieved 4 June 2015
  5. ^ a b c d "The Indian residential schools settlement has been approved" (PDF), Residential School Settlement
  6. ^ a b c d Statistics on the Implementation of the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, Government of Canada, Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, 31 March 2019, retrieved 31 July 2021
  7. ^ a b "Your questions answered about Canada's residential school system". CBC News. June 4, 2021.
  8. ^ "Residential Schools". Assembly of First Nations. 2010-05-03. Archived from the original on May 3, 2010. Retrieved 2009-12-02.
  9. ^ "Prince Albert Grand Council Indian Residential School Virtual Museum". 2015. Archived from the original on 18 December 2015. Retrieved 12 June 2015.
  10. ^ "Mission and Justice Relationships (Anglican Indian and Eskimo Residential Schools)". Anglican Church of Canada. Retrieved 12 June 2015.
  11. ^ "Oblates in the West - the Alberta Story : Impact on the West, the Residential Schools". Archived from the original on 2015-12-18. Retrieved 2016-06-28.
  12. ^ Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. May 2015.
  13. ^ "Residential School History: a Legacy of Shame" (PDF), Wabamo Centre for Aboriginal Health, Ottawa, ON, 1999, archived from the original (PDF) on December 3, 2015, retrieved 29 February 2016
  14. ^ DIAND (1997), Gathering Strength-Canada's Aboriginal Action Plan, Ottawa, Ontario: Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development/Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, ISBN 0-662-26427-4
  15. ^ "the Honourable Jane Stewart Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development on the occasion of the unveiling of Gathering Strength — Canada's Aboriginal Action Plan", Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC), Ottawa, Ontario, 7 January 1998, retrieved 4 June 2015
  16. ^ Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (n.d.). "Backgrounder" (PDF). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Retrieved July 9, 2016.
  17. ^ a b c "Indian Residential Schools Class Action – Compensation Settlement Information". Merchant Law LLP. 9 September 2014. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  18. ^ a b c Barnsley, Paul; Martens, Kathleen (May 19, 2016). "Residential schools settlement agreement under fire". APTN News. Sioux Lookout, Ontario. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  19. ^ a b Graveland, Bill (13 June 2014). "Alberta lawyer disbarred over fees charged to residential school survivors". Canadian Press (CP). Retrieved 28 September 2020.
  20. ^ a b Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (PDF), 8 May 2006, retrieved 28 September 2020
  21. ^ "Statement made in the House of Commons by the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development", Government of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 1 June 2015, retrieved 4 June 2015
  22. ^ a b Pacholik, Barb (January 25, 2016). "Regina lawyer Tony Merchant calls multi-million-dollar win 'wonderful'". Regina Leader Post. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  23. ^ a b Marshall, Tabitha (January 16, 2020). "Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved November 16, 2021.
  24. ^ a b c "GG relaunches Truth and Reconciliation Commission", CBC, 15 October 2015, retrieved 4 June 2015
  25. ^ "Independent Assessment Process (IAP)", Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations, nd, archived from the original on 2015-06-04, retrieved 2015-06-04
  26. ^ a b Curry, Bill (18 November 2011), Cost to redress native residential school abuse set to pass $5-billion, Ottawa, Ontario: The Globe and Mail, retrieved 4 June 2015
  27. ^ "Former residential school students must act if they want claims records preserved, tribunal warns". Retrieved 2019-10-24.
  28. ^ "Former TRC chair encourages residential school survivors to save records - APTN NewsAPTN News". aptnnews.ca. 16 January 2019. Retrieved 2019-10-24.
  29. ^ Eneas, Bryan (January 15, 2019). "Notification program for residential school records problematic, say interveners in case". CBC NEws. Retrieved October 24, 2019.
  30. ^ "The Indian residential schools settlement has been approved. The healing continues" (PDF), Residential School Settlement, retrieved 29 February 2016
  31. ^ "Justice Murray Sinclair", University of Winnipeg, nd, archived from the original on 3 January 2018, retrieved 4 June 2015
  32. ^ a b "Aboriginal Healing Foundation Frequently Asked Questions", AHF, nd, retrieved 4 June 2015
  33. ^ a b c d e f g h i "Settlement Agreement, Schedule O-3" (PDF). Residential Schools Settlement. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  34. ^ a b Fontaine v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SKQB 220, 389 DLR (4th) 749 (16 July 2015), Court of Queen's Bench (Saskatchewan, Canada)
  35. ^ a b c d e f "Settlement Agreement, Schedule O-1" (PDF). Residential Schools Settlement. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  36. ^ a b c d e f g "Settlement Agreement, Schedule O-2" (PDF). Residential Schools Settlement. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  37. ^ a b c d e f g "Settlement Agreement, Schedule O-4" (PDF). Residential Schools Settlement. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  38. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l "Joint Factum of the Plaintiffs" (PDF). Residential Schools Settlement. 18 August 2006. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  39. ^ "Anglican church to get residential school refund". CBC News. 8 November 2007. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  40. ^ a b Williams, Leigh Anne (May 7, 2014). "Settlement funds remaining". Anglican Journal. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  41. ^ a b c d e "Factum of the Protestant Church Entities" (PDF). Residential Schools Settlement. 14 August 2006. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  42. ^ a b c Stellick, Pamela (12 February 2014). "Affidavit of Pamela Stellick". UBC Indian Residential School History and Dialogue Centre. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  43. ^ Marc Miller, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations (19 November 2018). "Response to Question No. 1950" (PDF). Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). Vol. 148. Canada: House of Commons. p. 23541.
  44. ^ a b Martens, Kathleen (11 March 2013), "Outgoing chief adjudicator criticizes lawyers in residential school compensation process", APTN News, retrieved 4 June 2015
  45. ^ Paul, Alexandra (22 February 2012), "Lawyer disbarred in fee grab: Agrees to repay residential school victims. Claims he's the real victim, not 'Indians'", Winnipeg Free Press, retrieved 4 June 2015
  46. ^ "Lawyer who fleeced residential school survivors now in Israel", APTN News, 23 February 2012, retrieved 4 June 2015
  47. ^ Pemberton, Kim (26 February 2013), "Lawyer to hand over files on dealings with convicted killer in residential school compensation probe: Court investigates attorney's links to convicted killer who allegedly extorted money from claimants", Vancouver Sun, retrieved 4 June 2015
  48. ^ Allen, Bonnie (January 30, 2015). "Tony Merchant's law firm files lawsuit against Ottawa following $25M claim". CBC News. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  49. ^ Graham, Jennifer (10 April 2016). "Canadian government claims residential school lawyer committed fraud over fees". Global News. Retrieved 26 September 2020.
  50. ^ Ryan, Sarah (January 30, 2015). "Merchant Law Group in legal battle of its own". Global News. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  51. ^ "Court says government's appeal in $25 million case against Merchant Law Group can go ahead". Regina Leader Post. August 10, 2017. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  52. ^ Merchant Law Group LLP v. Attorney General of Canada on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Supreme Court of Canada. March 15, 2018. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  53. ^ Summary of Merchant Law Group LLP v. Attorney General of Canada on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Supreme Court of Canada. March 15, 2018. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  54. ^ Schmitz, Cristin (March 16, 2018). "Ottawa can continue with damages suit against Merchant Law Group". The Lawyer's Daily. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  55. ^ a b c d e Moore, Holly (August 2, 2018). "Supreme Court won't hear Merchant Law Group's appeal to keep residential school settlement money". APTN News. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  56. ^ a b c White-Crummey, Arthur (October 2, 2020). "Law Society suspends Tony Merchant for 8 months: a panel said the prominent Regina lawyer "intimidated" a residential school survivor into allowing him to hold back 21K from her settlement". Regina Leader Post. Regina, Saskatchewan. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
edit


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indian_Residential_Schools_Settlement_Agreement&oldid=1254625642"