A discourse marker is a word or a phrase that plays a role in managing the flow and structure of discourse. Since their main function is at the level of discourse (sequences of utterances) rather than at the level of utterances or sentences, discourse markers are relatively syntax-independent and usually do not change the truth conditional meaning of the sentence.[1] They can also indicate what a speaker is doing on a variety of different planes.[2] Examples of discourse markers include the particles oh, well, now, then, you know, and I mean, and the discourse connectives so, because, and, but, and or.[3] The term discourse marker was popularized by Deborah Schiffrin in her 1987 book Discourse Markers.[4]
Usage in English
editCommon discourse markers used in the English language include you know, actually, basically, like, I mean, okay and so. Discourse markers come from varied word classes, such as adverbs (well) or prepositional phrases (in fact). The process that leads from a free construction to a discourse marker can be traced back through grammaticalisation studies and resources.[citation needed] Discourse markers can be seen as a “joint product” of grammaticalization and cooption, explaining both their grammatical behavior and their metatextual properties.[5]
Traditionally, some of the words or phrases that were considered discourse markers were treated as fillers or expletives: words or phrases that had no function at all. Now they are assigned functions in different levels of analysis: topic changes, reformulations, discourse planning, stressing, hedging, or backchanneling.
Yael Maschler divided discourse markers into four broad categories: interpersonal, referential, structural, and cognitive.[6]
- Interpersonal markers are used to indicate the relationship between the speaker and the listener.
- Perception: look, believe me
- Agreement: exactly, or disagreement: I'm not sure
- Amazement: wow
- Referential markers, usually conjunctions, are used to indicate the sequence, causality, and coordination between statements.
- Sequence: now, then
- Causality: because
- Coordination: and, or non-coordination: but
- Structural markers indicate the hierarchy of conversational actions at the time in which they are spoken. These markers indicate which statements the speaker believes to be most or least important.
- Organization: first of all
- Introduction: so
- Summarization: in the end
- Cognitive markers reveal the speaker's thought process
- Processing information: uhh
- Realization: oh!
- Rephrasing: I mean
In her book on discourse analysis, Barbara Johnstone called discourse markers that are used by speakers to take the floor (like so) "boundarymarking uses" of the word. This use of discourse markers is present and important in both monologue and dialogue situations.[2]
Examples in other languages
editAnother example of an interpersonal discourse marker is the Yiddish marker nu, also used in Modern Hebrew and other languages, often to convey impatience or to urge the listener to act (cf. German cognate nun, meaning 'now' in the sense of 'at the moment being discussed', but contrast Latin etymological cognate nunc, meaning 'now' in the sense of 'at the moment in which discussion is occurring'; Latin used iam for 'at the moment being discussed' (and many other meanings) and German uses jetzt for 'at the moment in which discussion is occurring').[7] The French phrase à propos can indicate 'a smooth or a more abrupt discourse shift.'[5]
See also
editNotes
edit- ^ Carol Lynn, Moder; Aida Martinovic-Zic (2004). Discourse Across Languages and Cultures. John Benjamins Publishing Company. p. 117. ISBN 9027230781.
- ^ a b Johnstone, Barbara (2018). Discourse Analysis (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 9781119257714.
- ^ Schiffrin, Deborah (1986), Discourse markers, Studies in interactional sociolinguistics, 5., Cambridge [Cambridgeshire], ISBN 978-0-521-30385-9, OCLC 243527510
- ^ Schiffrin, Deborah (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521357180.
- ^ a b Heine, Bernd; Kaltenböck, Gunther; Kuteva, Tania; Long, Haiping (2021). The Rise of Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781108982856.
- ^ Jucker, Andreas H.; Ziv, Yael (1998). Discourse Markers: Descriptions and theory. John Benjamins Publishing. ISBN 9789027285522.
- ^ Zuckermann, Ghil'ad (2009). Hybridity versus Revivability: Multiple Causation, Forms and Patterns. In Journal of Language Contact, Varia 2: 40–67, p. 50.
Further reading
edit- Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1998. The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua 104(3–4), 235–260.
- Brown, Benjamin (2014). "'But Me No Buts': The Theological Debate Between the Hasidim and the Mitnagdim in Light of the Discourse-Markers Theory". Numen. 61 (5–6): 525–551. doi:10.1163/15685276-12341341.
- Brown, Benjamin (2014). "'Some Say This, Some Say That': Pragmatics and Discourse Markers in Yad Malachi's Interpretation Rules". Language and Law. 3: 1–20.