Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

In mathematics, more specifically in abstract algebra, the commutator subgroup or derived subgroup of a group is the subgroup generated by all the commutators of the group.[1][2]

The commutator subgroup is important because it is the smallest normal subgroup such that the quotient group of the original group by this subgroup is abelian. In other words, is abelian if and only if contains the commutator subgroup of . So in some sense it provides a measure of how far the group is from being abelian; the larger the commutator subgroup is, the "less abelian" the group is.

Commutators

edit

For elements   and   of a group G, the commutator of   and   is  . The commutator   is equal to the identity element e if and only if   , that is, if and only if   and   commute. In general,  .

However, the notation is somewhat arbitrary and there is a non-equivalent variant definition for the commutator that has the inverses on the right hand side of the equation:   in which case   but instead  .

An element of G of the form   for some g and h is called a commutator. The identity element e = [e,e] is always a commutator, and it is the only commutator if and only if G is abelian.

Here are some simple but useful commutator identities, true for any elements s, g, h of a group G:

  •  
  •   where   (or, respectively,  ) is the conjugate of   by  
  • for any homomorphism  ,  

The first and second identities imply that the set of commutators in G is closed under inversion and conjugation. If in the third identity we take H = G, we get that the set of commutators is stable under any endomorphism of G. This is in fact a generalization of the second identity, since we can take f to be the conjugation automorphism on G,  , to get the second identity.

However, the product of two or more commutators need not be a commutator. A generic example is [a,b][c,d] in the free group on a,b,c,d. It is known that the least order of a finite group for which there exists two commutators whose product is not a commutator is 96; in fact there are two nonisomorphic groups of order 96 with this property.[3]

Definition

edit

This motivates the definition of the commutator subgroup   (also called the derived subgroup, and denoted   or  ) of G: it is the subgroup generated by all the commutators.

It follows from this definition that any element of   is of the form

 

for some natural number  , where the gi and hi are elements of G. Moreover, since  , the commutator subgroup is normal in G. For any homomorphism f: GH,

 ,

so that  .

This shows that the commutator subgroup can be viewed as a functor on the category of groups, some implications of which are explored below. Moreover, taking G = H it shows that the commutator subgroup is stable under every endomorphism of G: that is, [G,G] is a fully characteristic subgroup of G, a property considerably stronger than normality.

The commutator subgroup can also be defined as the set of elements g of the group that have an expression as a product g = g1 g2 ... gk that can be rearranged to give the identity.

Derived series

edit

This construction can be iterated:

 
 

The groups   are called the second derived subgroup, third derived subgroup, and so forth, and the descending normal series

 

is called the derived series. This should not be confused with the lower central series, whose terms are  .

For a finite group, the derived series terminates in a perfect group, which may or may not be trivial. For an infinite group, the derived series need not terminate at a finite stage, and one can continue it to infinite ordinal numbers via transfinite recursion, thereby obtaining the transfinite derived series, which eventually terminates at the perfect core of the group.

Abelianization

edit

Given a group  , a quotient group   is abelian if and only if  .

The quotient   is an abelian group called the abelianization of   or   made abelian.[4] It is usually denoted by   or  .

There is a useful categorical interpretation of the map  . Namely   is universal for homomorphisms from   to an abelian group  : for any abelian group   and homomorphism of groups   there exists a unique homomorphism   such that  . As usual for objects defined by universal mapping properties, this shows the uniqueness of the abelianization   up to canonical isomorphism, whereas the explicit construction   shows existence.

The abelianization functor is the left adjoint of the inclusion functor from the category of abelian groups to the category of groups. The existence of the abelianization functor GrpAb makes the category Ab a reflective subcategory of the category of groups, defined as a full subcategory whose inclusion functor has a left adjoint.

Another important interpretation of   is as  , the first homology group of   with integral coefficients.

Classes of groups

edit

A group   is an abelian group if and only if the derived group is trivial: [G,G] = {e}. Equivalently, if and only if the group equals its abelianization. See above for the definition of a group's abelianization.

A group   is a perfect group if and only if the derived group equals the group itself: [G,G] = G. Equivalently, if and only if the abelianization of the group is trivial. This is "opposite" to abelian.

A group with   for some n in N is called a solvable group; this is weaker than abelian, which is the case n = 1.

A group with   for all n in N is called a non-solvable group.

A group with   for some ordinal number, possibly infinite, is called a hypoabelian group; this is weaker than solvable, which is the case α is finite (a natural number).

Perfect group

edit

Whenever a group   has derived subgroup equal to itself,  , it is called a perfect group. This includes non-abelian simple groups and the special linear groups   for a fixed field  .

Examples

edit

Map from Out

edit

Since the derived subgroup is characteristic, any automorphism of G induces an automorphism of the abelianization. Since the abelianization is abelian, inner automorphisms act trivially, hence this yields a map

 

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Dummit & Foote (2004)
  2. ^ Lang (2002)
  3. ^ Suárez-Alvarez
  4. ^ Fraleigh (1976, p. 108)
  5. ^ Suprunenko, D.A. (1976), Matrix groups, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, American Mathematical Society, Theorem II.9.4

References

edit
edit