FishLoveHam

Hey FishLoveHam, welcome to the Studio Ghibli task force! It's great to know you're interested in improving the coverage of Ghibli-related topics on Wikipedia. I just wanted to give you a heads-up that the work group has been pretty dormant for a while, but you can feel free to reach out to me if you need help or have any questions. Is there any article from the list that catches your eye, or that you might like to work on? —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I haven't really thought about what article to work on yet, maybe ones about the films or those involved in making them. I was also thinking of writing articles on Studio Ghibli characters. Thanks for your support :) FishLoveHam (talk) 08:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

	The Original Barnstar
	A very very well done to you for your amazing work in creating Keanu Taylor! You should be very proud - it is a great article and it is so lovely having another creator in the EastEnders/soaps Wikiprojects! Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions at all :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oh wow! Thank you for my first barnstar and I’m glad the article is okay!! Thanks again for your kindness and if I have any questions I’ll do that :) FishLoveHam (talk) 06:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

For continuing to create well sourced and detailed EastEnders articles and working very hard. Well done! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

THANKS DANILO!!

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karen Taylor (EastEnders), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julia Smith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

On 17 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pearl (X), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that actress Mia Goth was cast as both Pearl and Maxine in X to emphasize the similarities between the two characters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pearl (X). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pearl (X)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

User:DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Gray Atkins you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Gray Atkins for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d -- Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 20:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Nish Panesar you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Nish Panesar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d -- Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 19:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Ash Panesar you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Ash Panesar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d -- Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 20:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pearl (X) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 01:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Pearl (X) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pearl (X) and Talk:Pearl (X)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 01:43, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Pearl (X) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Pearl (X) for comments about the article, and Talk:Pearl (X)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I tried to leave a comment on the GA review but I'm not sure if you saw it or if I even put it in the right place (and didn't want to try too hard to edit the review page too much further for fear or breaking it or otherwise committing a policy faux-pas.

Earwig Copyvio Detector is working for me now and I have been able to investigate properly, and I can confirm that the page Earwig found has copied the plot summary from the Wikipedia article, specifically the plot summary in this Special:Diff/1231312549. I wrote the plot summary in the days immediately after the episode aired, and brought it in under 400 words (per the TV MOS). Subsequent editors added extra information that I initially reverted straight away, but then decided to let the enthusiasm happen and the editing to settle before bringing it back under 400. This 'peak length' plot summary is the one that was copied by the external website. When I did come back to the article, some other editors had tried to fix it but I wasn't convinced they'd made the right cuts, so I rolled the whole plot back to my original sub-400 words plot, and then I think some minor tweaks were made after.

If necessary I can find the diffs of my original edit and the rollback, which would prove beyond doubt that the Wikipedia is the source of the plot summary, but I hope you can see the above is proof enough. best regards, JustAnotherCompanion (talk) 13:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for getting in contact. I think you're right, so my bad. FishLoveHam (talk) 20:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Keegan Baker at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 04:52, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Our Girl series 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boot camp.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

May I ask why my image of Sharon was reverted? EEfamilytrees (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey. The image was reverted since I think the WikiProject has, quite frankly, had enough image dramas and edit wars due to them for a long time. Unless the character has undergone a significant or noteworthy physical change, a new image is not necessary, especially if it is a screenshot of grainier quality. The current image of Sharon is consistent with her current appearance, and therefore, is up to date and not in need of changing. I understand you are learning as an editor, but non-free images are only used to identify a character, not to enforce a personal preference. Thanks for asking, though. I understand you are still learning, so feel free to ask if you need help with anything.   FishLoveHam (talk) 16:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, about my Sonia image. You mentioned it's too dark. If I brightened it, would it be good enough? I'm still learning as you know. EEfamilytrees (talk) 21:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't think so. It is still a little blurry and, in my opinion, she has not changed in the slightest, especially not enough to warrant a new image. Based on the file's upload history I'm assuming it's from 2022/23, where did you get 2017 from? Images are not for decoration, and you seem to have that mindset. All I can really do is encourage you to read WP:NFC if you want to better your understanding. FishLoveHam (talk) 21:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello FishLoveHam, You have been paired at good article review circles to review .tv. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #9.

PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 00:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Georgie Lane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 05:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Georgie Lane you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Georgie Lane for comments about the article, and Talk:Georgie Lane/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 15:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Well done for getting your second GA!

DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much!   FishLoveHam (talk) 05:41, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello FishLoveHam, You have been paired at good article review circles to review A mythology for England. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #10.

🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elvis Harte you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fritzmann2002 -- Fritzmann2002 (talk) 01:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Elvis Harte you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Elvis Harte for comments about the article, and Talk:Elvis Harte/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fritzmann2002 -- Fritzmann2002 (talk) 21:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I hope you have a lovely day! :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 19:38, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Aww, thank you!   FishLoveHam (talk) 07:24, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi FishLoveHam. Hope you had a good birthday. The user EEfamilytrees has uploaded new versions of several soap character photos, but they’re all blurry. Could you please revert them. Thanks 2A00:23EE:16A8:AC55:60FF:9B2E:7FC2:744D (talk) 19:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi! First of all, thanks for the birthday wishes I really appreciate it! Although I'm not sure if I'm able to do that. I agree that they aren't great, and I can find a new version of the Elaine Peacock file, but Coronation Street isn't my scene. You can revert the files yourself. The ones this user changed are:

• File:Ken Barlow (2024).png (new version, original was File:Ken Barlow (2008).jpg)
• File:Ritasullivan.jpg (overwritten)
• File:Gailplatt 2008.jpg (overwritten)
• File:Tracy Barlow.jpg (overwritten)
• File:A Roberts 2008.jpg (overwritten)
• File:Ben Price (Nick Tilsley).png (overwritten)
• File:Kevin Webster.jpg (overwritten)
• File:Jennybradley2015.jpg (overwritten)

Thanks again for the birthday wishes! FishLoveHam (talk) 19:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, non-free images are meant to be partially low quality. They aren't significantly blurry also., I'm trying to improve myself as I know I've been a rubbish editor in the past. Next time, can you come to me if I've done something? Thank you. EEfamilytrees (talk) 22:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@EEfamilytrees Just to clarify, Coronation Street isn't my scene — I was merely guiding another user on what they could do if they had concerns about the image quality, so coming to me was an interesting decision but we're here now so:

• There is a difference between low resolution and blurry.
• Many of the files seem to have been altered without reason, and the newer versions are noticeably smaller and of decreased quality. I think that's the main frustration for this individual, as replacing files unnecessarily can be disruptive.

I'd also like to clarify that I don't mean to suggest that you've been a bad editor, I just don't understand your persistent fixation on tinkering with non-free files for soap opera character articles. These images serve an important role for identification rather than decoration, and maintaining their quality is key. We've been over this many times, to no avail, so I hope you understand that it's not about undermining your efforts. FishLoveHam (talk) 23:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@EEfamilytrees: – I hope you don't me saying on here (FLH feel free to remove this) but I would like to add onto the above. We really appreciate your help genuinely, but I do agree that changing the pictures at the moment is just causing more issue. This is partially because the images are meant to represent the character as a whole, not just what they look like now. WP:BROKE may be good to read – if it is not causing issues then it may be better to keep it as it is. However, it is a case by case basis. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, as you might of seen the last few days, I’ve been working on creating new character pages and less on images, so we’re all fine now. Also, FishLoveHam, if you don’t mind, can you check through my Penny Branning page? I haven’t finished it yet, but I want to know if there’s anything that you suggest I add. Thank you. EEfamilytrees (talk) 06:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello FishLoveHam, You have been paired at good article review circles to review Parental rights movement. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #13.

GMH Melbourne (talk) 22:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Captain James you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 12:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, FishLoveHam. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 18:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Captain James you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Captain James and Talk:Captain James/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello FishLoveHam, You have been paired at good article review circles to review Making the Bed. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #14.

GMH Melbourne (talk) 12:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Molly Dawes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OlifanofmrTennant -- OlifanofmrTennant (talk) 13:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Captain James you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Captain James for comments about the article, and Talk:Captain James/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 21:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi FishLoveHam, I wanted to leave a quick note here apologizing for the delay in my response on your GAN review. Something in my real-life got busy and I haven't had the time yet to dedicate to an in-depth response to some of the larger points you made in the first part of the review. I only just now got a chance to sit down for some focused, non-superficial wiki-ing and I wanted to make sure I wasn't holding up my review in the GARC. I expect to be able to give this the proper attention by this weekend, but wanted to keep you in the loop given the delay beyond the 7 days.

Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused you. Thanks, Bobby Cohn (talk) 01:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

It's alright, don't worry about it! FishLoveHam (talk) 05:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Molly Dawes you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Molly Dawes for comments about the article, and Talk:Molly Dawes/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OlifanofmrTennant -- OlifanofmrTennant (talk) 15:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article George Knight (EastEnders) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DoctorWhoFan91 -- DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 14:45, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I just wanted to thank you for having taken the time to review the "All Hell Breaks Loose" article, especially with how thorough you were. I admit I gave some pushback in certain areas cause I either didn't know how to change things or didn't want to. Still, I really appreciate your comments on how certain things I never even noticed had to be changed, or other areas improved upon. The article does look much better now thanks to your help. :) PanagiotisZois (talk) 13:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, you did great in the review! Good job on getting it to GA status.   FishLoveHam (talk) 13:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article George Knight (EastEnders) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:George Knight (EastEnders) for comments about the article, and Talk:George Knight (EastEnders)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DoctorWhoFan91 -- DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:21, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm not trying to be rude but may I ask why you revert almost all my edits. I spend a lot of time on some of them and I really don't see the problem with them because you don't specify the reason in the edit summary.

Thank you,

EEfamilytrees. EEfamilytrees (talk) 22:22, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Because you have been asked time and time again not to mess with non-free EastEnders files, so I struggle to see how you can't understand why those edits would be reverted. The reasons why the WikiProject doesn't condone editors doing this have also been explained to you before, but you don't seem to have any regard for it as this continues nearly three months after the first discussion. I'd like to stress that no one is undermining your efforts, but this is becoming tiresome behaviour. FishLoveHam (talk) 23:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I understand that but I was only adding what was said on Colin Russell's page to add a bit of consistency which it seemed to be lacking. I hope you can why I got a bit annoyed originally as I get told not to change Sharon's picture and then a few weeks later, another user changes it and that's been accepted. EEfamilytrees (talk) 00:01, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello FishLoveHam, Thank you for your kind words of praise a few weeks ago (can't remember exactly when off the top of my head). Those words really made me feel good about the edits I made on this particular article. However, I can see that a few of them have been moved to the "Other Characters" box at the bottom of the article. These characters are Dolly-Dean Hudson, Holly, Tyrion Ahmed and Jackie Fairhurst. I would like to move them back into the sections that they were in before they were moved, but I don't want to do so if it's not the right thing to do. After all, you did praise my hard work on this article. I don't understand why praise from other cast members, comparing their current roles to their other soap roles from what people have said in articles and fans speculation being reported by sources are not relevant to the character or the actor. I hope to hear from you soon. EmmerdaleFan2001 (talk) 12:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Teddy Mitchell you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:46, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nicola Mitchell you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:02, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Nicola Mitchell you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Nicola Mitchell for comments about the article, and Talk:Nicola Mitchell/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 21:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Teddy Mitchell you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Teddy Mitchell for comments about the article, and Talk:Teddy Mitchell/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Reply