Cantabrucu

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wentworth Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clubhouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

That's up for sources to decide. If you cannot provide a rationale based on a corpus of English-language sources backing up your position (that is: the position suggesting he was generally known by in sources by his first surname and one of his titles (he was also marquess of Estella) rather than the two surnames, please refrain from renaming articles and stick to the rationale of WP:UCRN provided by sources in general (in this case Spanish language sources) [1][2], that suggests otherwise....--Asqueladd (talk) 15:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating Prince Ataúlfo of Órleans.

User:Lefcentreright while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article. Article looks awesome.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lefcentreright (talk) 18:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Look, mate. It is already a bit tiring to deal with the nobiliary fancruft you are keen to insert everywhere in :en:wiki in a very disruptive pattern. I can do it without you commenting on what I comment to a third party. Cheers.--Asqueladd (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oh, well, well. Cree el ladrón que todos son de su condición. And vis-à-vis your question, no, mi mamá no me deja dar información a desconocidos.--Asqueladd (talk) 16:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Cantabrucu,

Thank you for creating Duke of Denia.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Needs to be properly cited.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Interstellarity}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Interstellarity (talk) 14:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Cantabrucu,

Thank you for creating Duke of Almazán de Saint Priest.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Needs more references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Interstellarity}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Interstellarity (talk) 14:57, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Cantabrucu,

Thank you for creating Duke of Almazán.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Needs more references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Interstellarity}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Interstellarity (talk) 14:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Cantabrucu,

Thank you for creating Duke of Tarifa.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Needs more references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Interstellarity}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Interstellarity (talk) 15:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Margaret Thatcher & Mario Conde.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Margaret Thatcher & Mario Conde.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Loewe full logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 24 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Loewe full logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Loewe logo (until 2000).svg
• File:Loewe logo old.svg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Loewe full logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Loewe logo (until 2000).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Loewe logo old.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miguel Ricardo de Álava, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vergara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

• Order of the Golden Fleece (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

It seems that the same user continues to insist on adding biased and poorly sourced information. It seems he has the agenda of making clear that the Austrian branch is better or truer. Can you review the case?

Many thanks. 46.222.232.156 (talk) 12:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please see WP:ANI#Slow moving edit war at Order of the Golden Fleece. You might have knowledge of whatever this dispute is about. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luis Morenés, 15th Count of Villada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gredos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

In the past I already expressed doubts about certain of your additions, as I did here, and I was indeed right, and you were wrong, as shows the history of that page. I now also have doubts expressed on this page: Talk:José Navarro, 7th Count of Casa Loja. Could you give reliable sources that indicate that José Navarro was indeed Count of Casa Loja? Paul Brussel (talk) 11:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Asqueladd (talk) 11:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

And btw, patience has a limit: I am so tired of your disruptive edits and the edit pattern is so eerily similar to that of Barbudo Barbudo that I am tempted to open a checkuser investigation between your account and this sockpuppeting cluster: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Libessart100/Archive.--Asqueladd (talk) 11:20, 23 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Francisco Fernández de Béthencourt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://lopedeclavijo.blogspot.com/2013/04/francisco-fernandez-de-bethencourt-y-ii.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Montería (hunt), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castile.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Galletas Fontaneda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peseta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Corporación Financiera Alba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Currently, it only has refs from 2 primary sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Real Club Valderrama logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Cantabrucu,

The reason for the new image is that it is the upto date logo of Real Club Valderrama, while the svg version is prior to the club being made royal (real). They are two completely different logos. Hope this helps. SethWhales ^talk 16:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Seth Whales!

That makes absolute sense. Thank you and sorry for the disruption! --Cantabrucu (talk) 12:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Cantabrucu. If that's okay with you, I have swapped them back again to the new logo. I have used the Commons version, not my non-free version. SethWhales ^talk 12:59, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Real Club Valderrama logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alfonso de Portago, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 11:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dear DrKay, I have used the BOE (Boletín Oficial del Estado) which is Spain's government official gazette, can't be more reliable than that. The other source is the Royal Academy of History of Spain. Thank you. --Cantabrucu (talk) 11:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm not talking about the sourced content. Read the caution. DrKay (talk) 11:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Apologies DrKay, understood! --Cantabrucu (talk) 11:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alfonso XIII, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish Africa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi. [3] IIRC, you have done this in other instances, replacing illustrations of local cuisine with random pics from elsewhere (whether if food from Córdoba to illustrate Extremaduran cuisine, or Greenwich Village dishes to illustrate food from Madrid). You should not do this just because you like the photo from the random location more (btw, just on top of that, those strange parsley leaves topping the dish should already tell you that the picture does not illustrate a particularly Madrilenian presentation of patatas bravas to begin with). Regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the Las Ventas illustration. If "variety" across articles goes against choosing the best illustration for each article, that criteria is kind of a disservice. Don't you think? I however think that the way forward it a photograph illustrating the bullfighting (the ultimate point of the section) in the bullring, rather than again illustrating just the architecture. What do you think about that?--Asqueladd (talk) 14:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Asqueladd! Thank you for your advice. Again, I apologise, I think you might be right on the matter. However, I don't know if whether the bravas are from Madrid or i.e. Toledo actually matter for the sake of the article (provided they are the same recipe as you mentioned, the leaves on top are for sure not the same, I agree in that case). Given you are an infinitely more experienced Wikipedia than myself, I trust you are right and will be more careful next time, I just hope you can sometimes be a tiny bit nicer in your criticism please :) Regarding the Las Ventas thing, I think variety should always be preferred provided that both images are of the same or very similar quality (the best one should always be the one used in the article and the lesser one as a link in another article in my view). Thanks again!!! --Cantabrucu (talk) 15:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

I am also wondering (that was the least retorical out of the two questions... ;) ), if the illustration of actual bullfighting in Madrid (example 1 zoomed out; example 2 zoomed in), wouldn't be better than whichever photograph attempts to only illustrate (indoor or outdoor) "architecture". Pardon me if am being a tad too emphatic, but I feel that there is a lazy trend in articles about cities, regions, et al. to illustrate every section with a building façade, whichever the topic it deals about, as if the main point regarding the illustration of EVERY single topic was to boast about beautiful architecture.--Asqueladd (talk) 15:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes Asqueladd, absolutely true. Beauty and perfection is certainly not a fair representation of reality, but I don't think it is a bad thing to choose the most aesthetically pleasing photographs when writing articles! --Cantabrucu (talk) 15:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

In the way I see—it is not rocket science—the article about patatas bravas should feature the best possible illustration of patatas bravas (considerations may apply other than pleasantness of the aesthetics, for example, the adherence to a certain standard). The section about food in Madrid should choose the most illustrative pictures of food from Madrid (while the selection is certainly open to discussion, the picture being from Madrid should not be a point up for discussion). The article about the Las Ventas bullring should feature the best possible illustration of that architectural structure. The section of bullfighting in the article of Madrid should choose the photograph best depicting bullfighting in Madrid. Then, if some photo illustrating a section of a given article regarding the food or the local cultural practices (of Madrid or Villanueva de la Serena, or, if we are considering Spain, of any of the more than 8,000 municipalities) repeats in another article (about a dish, about a building...) that surely cannot be a main concern.--Asqueladd (talk) 15:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Totally agree! --Cantabrucu (talk) 15:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Just for the record. The current patatas bravas (File:Patatas bravas madrid (cropped).jpg) are said to be from "Casa Toni", Madrid (Calle de la Cruz [es], 14). The ones from the picture you added (File:Patatas bravas - La Nacional.jpg; curiously by the same photographer!) are said to be from La Nacional Restaurant, West Village, Manhattan, New York (239 W 14th Street). The former patatas also look way more "traditional", "castizas" or whatever you may call the idea of adherence to a longstanding presentation distinct of Madrid bars.--Asqueladd (talk) 16:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Interesting! Thanks for the info!--Cantabrucu (talk) 16:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Grupo Prisa logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mariano Téllez-Girón, 12th Duke of Osuna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peseta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Cantabrucu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Corporación Financiera Alba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Beltrán Alfonso Osorio, 18th Duke of Alburquerque, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 18:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Marquessate of Villena a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Marquess of Villena. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Btw, I agree with your move. Cheers! Thinker78 (talk) 01:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Cantabrucu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Corporación Financiera Alba".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:43, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

I see that you recently tried to have an article renamed by copying its content into a new article and then requesting that the original article be deleted. That is not an acceptable way to rename a page, because it destroys the editing history, which must be kept to comply with Wikipedia's copyright licensing terms. Instead, if there is,a good reason for a page to be renamed, then the existing page, complete with its editing history, must be moved to the new title. JBW (talk) 21:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply