Arwenz

Hi Arwenz. Thank you for your work on Lindbäcks. Another editor, CanonNi, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating the article. I've added some tags with instructions on how to fix the issues listed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CanonNi}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 11:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Dark oxygen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 22:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Arwenz! Your additions to Agama Yoga have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 00:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Lindbäcks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication found it meets N:ORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Star Mississippi 02:13, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 02:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arwenz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I acted in good faith. I like to edit Wikipedia. I understood why I was blocked. I won't do this again. I will put all information in my own words. I thought that copying a single phrase from a newspaper is not a problem. I haven't been warned for this before so I think blocking me indefinitely is excessive and way too harsh. Arwenz (talk) 16:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

• What is copyright?
• How is Wikipedia licenced?
• Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
• Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
• How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 14:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Arwenz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

• Copyright means that the original creators of products (pieces of writing) and anyone they give authorization to are the only ones with the exclusive right to reproduce the work. The copyright owner has the right to control how their material is used. * Most of Wikipedia's text and many of its images are co-licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) - Wikipedia:Copyrights - which means that is free to use Wikipedia's text for almost any purpose - as long as you attribute the authors (for example using a hyperlink to the article) and distribute the work (and any alterations or transformations) under the same or similar licenses . * Copying material without the permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline) is likely to be a copyright violation. - Wikipedia:Copyright violations * We can use copyrighted content when the content is copyrighted and published under a compatible licence like GNU FDL or CC SA - or when copying a small part of the text and using quotations (fair use) - Wikipedia:Quotations#Fair_use * I will use my own words when I will mention the facts published in the references . Arwenz (talk) 20:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Accept reason:

After discussing with the blocking admin (see below), I have lifted your block. Please note any further copyright violations will likely result in an immediate reblock. Yamla (talk) 12:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Star Mississippi:As blocking admin, what are your thoughts given the above response? --Yamla (talk) 20:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks @Yamla.

I mean it's not a CV because of how our text is released, but to me it doesn't read as if they understand it,simply reciting it. I have no objection if you decide to unblock since they're a fairly new user. However I'm not sure this gives me confidence we won't be right back here. Star Mississippi 00:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Secta Vidrenilor. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Gery Shalon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected to 2014 JPMorgan Chase data breach. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:45, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Evol (sect). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello - on my talk page, you said: "regarding your revert at Sunflower oil based on an essay WP:SCIRS which is an essay, not a policy. Sunflower oil is a food ingredient, not a medical or biology topic. I do not understand what do you mean. Please explain to me: I am only allowed to use scientific journals as references? From now on I am not allowed to reference newspapers or respected national associations?"

This is a commercial and promotional website, which does not represent a neutral assessment of sunflower and its derived products (the word amazing is a peacock term, WP:PEA). It would be suitable to have it as an external link, as done for many commercial memberships on Wikipedia.

Whether for history, commercial products or uses, WP:RS guides editors to choose objective, peer-assessed reviews, if available. Zefr (talk) 22:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Zefr - After you deleted my contribution, you noticed that in the article there are many places where the cited source is exactly from the same site that you said is not a reliable source, but "a commercial and promotional website which does not represent a neutral assessment of sunflower and its derived products". And instead of reposting my contribution, you considered it more appropriate to replace the cited source with a more reliable one, but without doing the same with my contribution. At this moment the article "sunflower oil" still contain references to the website you dislike. I had to face discriminatory treatment at work and I still have it, but Wikipedia is the last place in the world where I could have thought that I would be treated in this way. And I also had to tell you that my contribution, which was about a historical event, could be categorized as true or false, by no means neutral or partisan, because it did not describe any potential benefit or damage brought to the consumer by the product in question. Arwenz (talk) 14:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Arwenz - As a dynamic encyclopedia, Wikipedia is under constant review and revision by multiple editors. Having an edit challenged or removed is a normal part of the process, so it shouldn't be treated as a personal affront, but rather is the normal editorial pursuit of a better article.

The NSA source remaining in the article addresses the fatty acid profiles of the four possible sunflower oil products. There may be no other source that provides this information in such a clear comparison. History of sunflower oil use is a more widely-covered topic for which numerous sources exist, and so is a topic that may be edited by others who find a clearer, more objective source.

Good luck in your editing. Zefr (talk) 22:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Baffle blocks, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 00:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadow311 was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Baffle blocks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Shadow311 (talk) 22:32, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Shadow311 - I have added a little bit to the article. I am sorry but I have to disagree with you. The photos and the description are more than enough of a context for anyone unfamiliar with the subject matter to understand what is it about. Anyone can understand terms like "flood control", "irrigation systems" and descriptions like "used in flowing water to reduce its force" and make the connection between the photos and such terms and descriptions to understand what baffle blocks are used for.

Also, I believe the concept of baffle block is encyclopedic, it is a real-life building block, people can see them in rivers / dams, there are photos with it, so it is undeniably enciclopedic, with or without references, because it is a repeating part of the landscape that anyone can see, just like hills or valleys. I could only find some very limited bibliography for it and unfortunately I can't find much references. However, this is not a wiktionary term, an attribute or verb like snag, Scruffy, tepid, flog, drivel or scorn, so I believe it deserves an encyclopedic article no matter the number of references, like any other instrument used on a large scale or a repeating part of the landscape does. Arwenz (talk) 18:52, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Arwenz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, SugarGh0st RAT, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SugarGh0st RAT.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ibjaja055}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ibjaja055 (talk) 16:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Arwenz. When you're translating articles from other language Wikipedias, always put a link to the original article in your edit summary. You can see what I did here for an example. This is really important. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 00:24, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi! {{Speciesbox}} (which is used instead of {{Automatic taxobox}} for species) automatically retrieves the taxonomy template of the genus, so there is no need to create specific ones at the species level. Also, extinct taxa usually have articles created for genera rather than species. Good luck! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:50, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holographic direct sound printing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holographic direct sound printing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 11:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Artificial cell nucleus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is effectively a news article. Wikipedia is for accepted information, not new advanced. Please look at WP:TOOSOON, & WP:NOT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Energy-assisted magnetic recording has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Both heat and microwave assisted magnetic recording pages already exist. There is no reason to duplicate.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Workspace as a Service has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is already an entry in As a service. At most this should be replaced by a redirect and the sources added to that page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

While I thank you for your contributions, at the same time please do not create duplicate stubs of existing articles. Wikipedia also does not cover new events unless there is already extensive coverage. Therefore new scientific advances rarely get pages for 2-3 years, and only then if many others (more than 100 often) papers have cited the work.

Rather than creating new pages directly in main, I suggest that you use the AfC process until you understand better how Wikipedia works. That will give you more feedback. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ldm1954: Hello, I found a newspaper article about ePMR and then I learned that it is related to EAMR, so I started the article Energy-assisted magnetic recording where I mentioned both EAMR and ePMR. I am looking into regular newspapers in order to find things that might deserve articles at Wikipedia, I am not hunting scientific publications for new stuff. ePMR and EAMR are not just scientific research, they are technologies used into products mentioned in newspapers and people can buy. Arwenz (talk) 19:37, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Energy-assisted magnetic recording is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy-assisted magnetic recording until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 19:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Energy-assisted magnetic recording is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy-assisted magnetic recording (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 19:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Workspace as a Service is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workspace as a Service until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 19:48, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply