Talk:List of bridges of Pittsburgh

I am planning on adding a small image of each bridge on the left of each section.

Also, as I mention in my comment in the text, this is for a brief overview of the more prominent bridges. It is not suppose to be an article on them, just some interesting facts and where they are (streets).

Wouldn't the number of bridges be useful in this article?BradenW 18:21, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nearly all of the bridges in Pittsburgh are made of Aztec Gold? I didn't know that. Maybe I should head up the river and grab a few of those Aztec Gold nuts and bolts. I.e. what is the "Aztec Gold" thing about...? Is it somehow connected to the "half moon" bridges? --24.189.102.41 (talk) 03:01, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hamburg, Germany does not have 1,200 bridges within its city limits. Pittsburgh hold the world record for bridges at 455, barely beating out the previous record holder of Venice Italy. So unless Hamburg built upwards of 800 bridges in a years timespan, there is no way they have 1,200. Building so many bridges in such a short period of time would shut down all business in Hamburg and drive the residents out —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.240.62.193 (talk) 05:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please note that at Talk:Pittsburgh, there is a discussion about whether Pittsburgh is really the city with most bridges in the world (if you ask me, it's clearly not; NYC has four times as many).--137.248.134.8 (talk) 16:06, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

According to this German portal about bridges http://www.brueckenweb.de/2content/datenbank/listen/basanzstadt.php#.VITehmeExnY New York has the most bridges, followed by Hamburg, Germany. In that list, Pittsburgh is 23rd worldwide and 15th in the US with 715 bridges. As source for the numbers of US cities is given the National Bridge Inventory http://nationalbridges.com/nbi It all boils down to what type of bridges are included in the statistics. Der Umi from Germany (talk) 23:22, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Der_Umi_from_GermanyReply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bridges of Pittsburgh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100204112743/http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/news/9841603/detail.html to http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/news/9841603/detail.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Fern Hollow Bridge collapse

54mmkds (talk) 14:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating that. I think the right thing to do is to:

1. Remove the note about the collapse of the bridge from the lede of this page because Wikipedia is not a newspaper
2. Remove the entry for Fern Hollow Bridge from this page, since it isn't a bridge of Pittsburgh anymore. This would be consistent what what was done when the Hulton Bridge was demolished.

Any objections?

tlesher (talk) 20:41, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply