Talk:Khmer Rouge

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Khmer Rouge article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: 12 months

Socialism High‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cold War Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia Top‑importance

Khmer Rouge is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Southeast Asia High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Politics: Political parties High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as High-importance).

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Rintrah, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on February 2007.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

Section sizes

Section size for Khmer Rouge (48 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	20,269	20,269
Etymology	2,453	2,453
Ideology	15	21,921
Influence of Communist thought	4,328	4,328
Khmer nationalism	4,303	4,303
Autarky	3,200	3,200
Relationship to religion	5,649	5,649
Interpretations	4,426	4,426
History	14	81,794
Origins	16	15,240
Early history	7,805	7,805
Paris student group	7,419	7,419
Path to power and reign	32	47,228
KPRP Second Congress	4,420	4,420
Sihanouk and the GRUNK	8,337	8,337
Foreign involvement	30	7,184
Before 1975	4,122	4,122
1975–1993	3,032	3,032
Regime	48	4,234
Leadership	4,186	4,186
Life under the Khmer Rouge	593	593
Evacuation of the cities	3,216	9,214
Economic policies	1,014	1,014
Family relations	2,004	2,004
Education	2,980	2,980
Language reforms	1,307	1,307
Crimes against humanity	4,743	11,907
Number of deaths	5,642	5,642
Genocide	1,522	1,522
Internal power struggles and purges	7,555	7,555
Fall	13	11,757
War with Vietnam	2,907	2,907
Place in the United Nations	2,920	2,920
Insurgency and surrender	5,917	5,917
Legacy	2,888	17,746
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia	5,742	5,742
Museums	2,765	2,765
Publications	2,652	2,652
Dialogues	1,906	1,906
Media coverage	1,793	1,793
See also	1,114	1,114
Notes	24	24
References	30	30
Further reading	4,514	4,514
External links	589	5,082
Other online sources	970	970
Genocide	1,923	1,923
Uncategorized	1,600	1,600
Total	154,947	154,947

Is the Rebecca Gidley quote a misquote?

Latest comment: 29 days ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Sorry, first attempt at this sort of thing (wiki edit). Anyways, this section stood out to me as odd:

> According to author Rebecca Gidley, the Khmer Rouge "almost immediately erred by implementing a Maoist doctrine rather than following the Marxist–Leninist prescriptions".

Briefly checking the source, it seems that Rebecca Gidley is perhaps describing the *public political position of the the KRP*, NOT Rebecca's own belief.

That is, the book section is saying (paraphrase) "[The KRP, in a quest for political legitimacy] claimed that the KR almost immediately erred by implementing a Maoist doctrine rather than following the Marxist–Leninist prescriptions". It is not saying, again paraphrase "I, the historian writing about this, believe that the KR erred by ... almost immediately erred by implementing a Maoist doctrine rather than following the Marxist–Leninist prescriptions" (this is the claim in the current wiki article.)

Someone should double check my thought process and remove the quote if I'm right, or whatever wiki people do, I'm not sure. Don't want to touch a super important article like this without knowing the proper protocol. But I think this is bad. 99.229.176.124 (talk) 17:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, the PRK, not the KRP 99.229.176.124 (talk) 17:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Also, actually, this whole section is kind of odd, right? I've never looked this closely at a wiki page, but basically the entire section (other than this misquote) is based on the Ben Kiernan source. I don't know if there's a way to "git blame" and see who wrote the section, but given the misquote, I'd be worried about balance / accuracy also. (this may be no big deal – I just don't know! maybe this is truly the only/best source on the ideology of the KR! but I think I should flag this, and I think people should be careful. Better safe than sorry!) 99.229.176.124 (talk) 18:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic