Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Talk:Extraterrestrial UFO hypothesis

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Gtoffoletto in topic Fermi Paradox

Geography

edit

The geography section reads like an opinion essay arguing in favor of ETH. It seems clear to me that it conflicts with Wikipedia's policies. I'm curious as to why it hasn't been altered or removed.

Do you mean that scientists are forbidden to argue in favor of a hypothesis. The things I learn from Wikipedia!

Kortoso (talk) 22:51, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fermi Paradox

edit

IMHO, the Fermi paradox ought to be addressed here somehow, especially in light of recent revelations regarding billions and billions of recently discovered habitable planets.

Any ideas regarding treatment? Kortoso (talk) 20:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Agree. I think the Fermi paradox should be referenced. Not extensively, but with one or two sentences. It could fit into the "opinions of scientists" section. Perhaps elsewhere. Use your best judgment.--GodBlessYou2 (talk) 22:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Only if some reliably published sources have made such a connection WP:OR, and only if it represents a significant portion of the voices in the discussions. WP:UNDUE -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
The connection is made in many, if not most of the sources identified in Fermi Paradox, for example here. Fermi's proposition of his paradox was a direct argument against giving credence to the claims of UFO sightings.--GodBlessYou2 (talk) 03:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
It's a slightly old discussion but considering that the article currently only includes a see-also link to it, I agree that more relevant coverage would be adequate. While the fermi paradox allows the possibility of the universe being populated with other life, it at the same time explains why two civilizations are unlikely to ever discover eachother, considering the rarity and distance in space and/or time. —PaleoNeonate10:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Absolutely, +1 -- {{u|Gtoffoletto}}talk 12:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Extraterrestrial hypothesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:59, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Extraterrestrial hypothesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Extraterrestrial hypothesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply